由于跳空风险增加和价格波动剧烈，应避免交易BP。
逐段跳播
我收到了 BP、AR 和 TS。
I received BP, AR and TS.
所以，BP，今天有一个新的买入信号。
So, BP, a new buy signal today.
现在，让我们在 TradingView 图表上看看 BP。它看起来实际上有一点……这是一个跳空填补的箭头，Joe。我不会交易这只股票。这是 Chris 的 discretionary 规则之一。
我不喜欢很多 discretionary 规则，但最近在这些走势中出现了很多跳空。回到这一点，我接受它。但在这里，箭头的性质已经改变了。你看到了吗，Joe？
Now, let's move on to BP here in the TradingView charts. It actually looks like it has a bit of...this is a gap-filled arrow, Joe. I will not trade this stock. This is one of Chris's discretionary rules. I don't like a lot of discretionary rules, but there have been a lot of gaps in many of these moves recently. Returning to this point, I am accepting of it. But here, the nature of the arrow has changed. Do you see that, Joe?
这是一只我可能感兴趣的股票。为什么？趋势是向上的，并且它已经突破了需求区。它不仅仅是一个平滑而漂亮的趋势，而是一个强劲而大的趋势，看起来并不疯狂。当它来到这里时，它看起来像一个疯狂的前女友。
它真的到处反复无常。你有 5% 的向上跳空，5% 的向下跳空，上上下下。所以，我认为如果我们想这样做，我想看看过去六个月跳空发生的频率，当然我们必须对此进行调查。跳空发生的频率是多少，以及这些跳空的程度。
因为，天哪，这里的箭头的性质与那里的箭头的性质不同。如果你们也看到了，请在聊天中打数字 2，因为我们正在看一个两面市场。这是一个高度周期性的市场，不仅如此，它到处都有跳空。现在，跳空可以是美妙的。
它当然可以是美妙的。但由于这些跳空的性质，有额外的风险水平，我不想承担。我只是不想忍受它。我看到了，但我不想要。所以，这是我会个人远离的少数 discretionary 事情之一。
This is a stock I might be interested in. Why? The trend is upward, and it has broken through the demand zones. It is not just a smooth and beautiful trend, but a strong and big trend that does not look crazy. When she comes here, she looks like a crazy ex-girlfriend. He is literally fickle everywhere. You have 5% upward gaps, 5% downward gaps, up and down. So, I think if we want to do that, I would like to look at the past six months to see the rate at which gaps occur, and of course we will have to conduct a survey of that. What is the frequency of the occurrence of the gaps, as well as the extent of those gaps. Because, man, the nature of the arrow here is not the same as the nature of the arrow there. If you see this too, type number two in the chat because we are looking at a two-faced market here. This is a highly cyclical market, and not only that, it opens up gaps everywhere. Now, gaps can be wonderful. It can certainly be wonderful. But because of the nature of these gaps, there is an additional level of risk that I do not want to take. I simply don't want to put up with it. I see it, but I don't want it. So, this is one of the very few discretionary things that I would personally stay away from.
再次，同一个行业，同一个领域，所以所有这些都将与 BP 类似。
Again, same sector, same field, so all of this will be similar to BP,
这个频道对 $BP 的历次判断
Christopher Uhl - OVTLYR 在这只股票上只有这一条判断。