Constellation在10年时间跨度上被评为A至B级;AI带来的不确定性增加和低有机增长(1%)使其评级从此前的S级下调。
逐段跳播
我们来看看Constellation。我觉得Constellation是个好例子。这是一家有趣的公司。我对这个领域相当看好。我没有投资Constellation,但我确实买了一些较小的相关股票。
Let's do Constellation. Um I feel like Constellation is a good one. Um it's an interesting company. Um I'm quite bullish on the space. I'm not invested in Constellation, but I did buy some of these smaller plays.
我认为Constellation也做到了。我认为我们超过了加元,我们大概是3100多。同样,你可以说Constellation有点太大了,而且他们的很多押注很大程度上取决于终值。所以存在风险。
Um and Constellation I think did so as well. I think we're over Canadian dollars. we're like 3100 something like that. Um again you could argue that constellation is a bit too big and you know a lot of the bets that they have very much depend on the terminal value. So there are risks.
但到目前为止,我们在榜单上已经有足够多的名字,我认为我们可以说,好吧,我们如何看待Constellation与Adobe和微软相比?我个人认为它的风险比Adobe小,可能也不如微软那样占主导地位。
Um but by now we have enough names on the tier list that I think we can sort of just say okay well how do we think about consolation compared to let's say Adobe and compared to Microsoft um and I personally think it has less risks than Adobe um and probably not as dominant as Microsoft.
所以,就根据那个聊天告诉我们,你会把Constellation放在哪里,10年时间范围。我想我会把它放在某个地方,也许我们会这样做。我认为是A到B。
So just judge by that chat tell us uh where you would put constellation 10ear time horizon. I I think I would put it somewhere in a maybe we do something like this. I think A to B.
我们只是没有足够的信息,他们拥有这么多业务,我们对每一项业务的敞口了解不够。但另一方面,也有观点认为他们在很多不同的公司中进行了大量多元化。
>> We we just don't have enough they own so many businesses and we just don't have enough insights into how each how exposed each one is. Um but then also there's an argument that they're diversified a lot across a lot of different companies.
我想我不同意。我对Constellation没有那么乐观。我认为有一段时间Constellation是S级。但我们也必须认识到,由于LLM技术,世界已经发生了根本性的变化,当事实改变时,我们必须改变我们的观点。
所以我认为Constellation的不确定性比五年前更大。五年前它会是S级,今天我认为它是A到B。
I think I I think I disagree. I'm not that not as bullish on Constellation. I think uh I think there was a time when constellation was was S tier. I think we also have to recognize like the world has fundamentally changed because of these this LLM technology and you know we have to um you know when the facts change we have to change our opinions and so I think constellation has more uncertainty than uh than it did you know five years ago and so uh you know five years ago would have been an S tier today I think it's it's a to b
是的,这只是评论中的一点。即使是管理层也不知道AI会如何影响它。我理解。每当管理层在电话会议上说我们不知道影响会是什么,这有点可怕。我非常喜欢那些公开说出来的管理团队,因为我们今天讨论的所有公司,没有一个CEO知道五年后AI的世界会是什么样子。
但99%的人会告诉你他们知道,而且这对他们的公司有好处。我非常喜欢管理团队坐在那里说我不知道它会如何影响业务。
Yeah, that's like just one one thing about the comment here. Even management doesn't know how AI will impact it. I get it. Like whenever management is sitting on a call and then saying we don't know what the impact will be, it's sort of a bit scary. I very much like management teams that say that out loud because all of the companies we're discussing today, not a single CEO knows what the world with the AI will look like in 5 years time. But 99% of them will tell you they know and it's good for their company. I very much enjoy when the management team is sitting there and just says I don't know how it will, you know, impact the business.
如果你只看Constellation在收购或并购新公司上花的钱,我认为上个季度达到了历史最高或至少是多年来的最高水平。
If you just look at the um the money that um consolation spent on buying or acquiring new companies, I think was at an all-time high or at least multi-year high in the last quarter.
有机增长,这就是问题所在。就今天的价值而言,我认为它更高。嗯,它曾经更高,比如说两个月前。也许现在它又不那么高了。我通常会说,我认为今天的价值比10年后更高,因为有一件事让我担心Constellation,那就是有机增长。
Um organic growth and that's sort of the problem. And you know, in terms of value today, um I think it's higher tech. Well, it used to be higher, let's say two months ago. Um maybe now it's it's not that high up again. I would generally say I see it higher value today than in you know 10 years time because one thing that does worry me about consolation is organic growth.
上个季度它有机增长只有1%。我认为这个数字通常大约是3%或4%,但对于中性来说,是1%。我们社区里有几个人,尤其是有一位曾在Constellation工作很长时间的人,现在在VMS领域有自己的业务。
他也说最重要的是那些公司的终值。你也可以通过有机增长很好地判断这一点。如果它这么慢,例如你可以与Topicus相比,后者要高得多。
Um it only grew 1% organically last quarter. I think the number generally has been like 3 or 4% but for uh neutral it was 1%. And and we have a you know a couple people but especially one person in our community who worked for constellation a long time who's now having his own business in the VMS space. Um and he also said like the most important thing is the terminal value of those companies. Um and you can judge that quite well also by organic growth. Um and if it's so slow for example you could compare it to topicus which is way higher.
总之,我的观点是,正因为如此,今天的价值比10年后更高,因为我认为存在终值风险,可能更高。
Um anyway my point being I think value today because of that is higher than in 10 years just because I think there is a terminal risk um that might be higher.
现在我们确实把Constellation放在了A到B,10年时间范围。我会说,当我们报道它时,我仍然会把它放在A。现在它可能会在这里,A到B,可能更接近B。
Now we did put consolation here on A to B 10ear time horizon. I would I would have said like when we covered it I would have still put it into A. Now it would probably be here. um A to B, maybe closer to B.
26倍营业利润并不是非常便宜。你有有机……你做了那个吗?那是唯一一个指标。好吧。但那是最重要的,远远超过其他,你必须看它,然后技术上你还必须调整他们的Topicus持股。
>> 26 times operating profits is not incredibly cheap. You have the organ the organic >> Did you do that? >> That's like the the one metric. Okay. But like that's the most Yeah, by far you got to look at and then technically you also have to adjust that for their topic stake.
但这就是为什么Fisk AI在那里不太管用的原因。
>> Um but that goes to that's why Fisk AI doesn't work there um that well.
但我不知道它目前在哪里交易。我认为当我们在这个节目上报道它时,它大约在18倍交易。它上涨了。那是实际现金的17.5倍。好的,所以那才是更好的指标,对吧?
But I wouldn't know where it's currently trading there. I think it used to trade at about 18 times when we covered it on the show. It went up. >> That's 17 and a half times true cash. Okay. So that's that's the better metric, huh?
是的,那显然更好。我会把它放在这里的某个位置。它肯定比微软便宜,也许不像Adobe那么便宜,大概介于两者之间。
>> Yeah, that's by far the better. I'll put it somewhere here. It's definitely cheaper than Microsoft. Maybe not as cheap as Adobe like somewhere there.
另外,它从历史高点下跌了40%,你知道,这并不意味着它不会进一步下跌,但这很有趣。我们目前处于B点,10年后是C点。我认为这相当接近。
>> also >> down 40% from its all-time high, you know. Not not that that like >> not that that doesn't mean it can't go further, but uh further down, but that interesting. We at, you know, B today, C in 10 years. I think that's pretty close.
这个频道对 $CNC 的历次判断
The Intrinsic Value Podcast 在这只股票上只有这一条判断。