$NVDA

NVDA被低估且已计入风险;近期盈利不是问题,提供了逢低买入的机会。

看涨他说的是几天内
**Prepare** Critical Nvidia Stock Earnings
Meet Kevin发布 2026-08-25 · 59 段内容
00:06/ 打开原视频

逐段跳播

59 段内容

这条视频里关于 $NVDA 说的每一段,按说话顺序排列。点任意一行,上面的视频跳到那一刻。

0:06每一格是一段原话 · 点一下跳到视频的那个位置33:14

这基本上是对总可寻址市场的彻底重新定义,因为这基本上相当于2025年美国整个GDP的100%,这对英伟达来说听起来可能是看涨的。英伟达的盈利预期。

That is like a total redefinition of total addressable market since that's basically 100% of the entire GDP of the United States in 2025, which sounds bullish maybe for Nvidia. Nvidia expectations for earnings.

英伟达的财报在明天发布。和往常一样,在收盘后。我们确实预计英伟达会超出预期。从历史上看,他们总是能超出预期。调整后每股收益预期为29美元。英伟达在过去八次中有七次超出预期。按GAAP基础,每股收益预期为2.15美元。

英伟达在这项上八次全部超出预期。营收预期为922.9亿美元,过去八次全部超出预期。

Nvidia earnings are tomorrow. Uh they are as usual after the bell. We do expect Nvidia to beat. Historically, they always end up beating. Adjusted EPS expectations $29. Nvidia beats seven out of eight of the last times. Uh EPS is expected on the gap basis at $2.15. Nvidia beats eight out of eight times on this. Revenue is expected at 92.29 billion with a beat eight out of eight of the last times.

美国银行实际上认为他们会更接近940亿。这对英伟达来说最终会是一件大事,因为尽管英伟达能在营收上八次全部超出预期,但英伟达在过去四次财报发布后股价都下跌了,这对这家赚了这么多钱而且现在如此便宜的企业来说是一种侮辱。

Bank of America actually thinks they'll be closer to 94 billion. And that ends up being a really big deal for Nvidia because even though Nvidia can beat on revenue eight out of eight times, Nvidia in the last four earnings releases has gone down afterwards, which is an insult to this business that makes so much money and is so freaking cheap right now.

净利润预期为509.8亿美元,如果你算一下,净利润除以预期营收意味着他们大约能保留55.2%的利润。他们每赚一美元,55.2%就是税后利润。

$94 billion is the Bank of America expectation. you really have to beat the expectations uh that are on the higher end. So current expectation on average consensus is 92.29. Usually for the stock to go up, you have to beat the higher of the expectations. net $50.98 billion expected, which if you do the math on that, the net divided by the expected revenue means they're taking about 55.2% of the bottom line. every dollar that they make, 55.2% is after tax profit.

这份财报的焦点将全部集中在利润率上,尤其是我们刚刚看到15%的涨价,这实际上低于Edgewater Research对第三季度预测的20%到30%的涨价。

the big focus on this earnings report is all going to have to do with margin, especially since we just saw a 15% price increase, which was actually lower than the 20 to 30% price increase that Edgewater Research was projecting for the third quarter.

我们涨价15%以抵消部分内存价格。我们已经看到一些领先的英伟达芯片进行了调整和重新配置,我们看到它们的显存余量更低。

We had a 15% price increase to offset some of those memory prices. And we've seen some respecting and some rejiggering of some of these leading edge uh Nvidia chips where we're seeing them come in with lower headroom for uh VRAM.

所以基本上对内存问题的敞口更低,这让你不禁想问,为什么我们要在芯片中制造缩水式通胀?为什么我们要减少内存?但也可能是因为我们可能根本不需要这些芯片中有那么多内存。

So basically lower uh exposure to that memory issue which then makes you wonder like why why are we making like creating shrinkflation in chips? Why are we reducing memory there? But it could also be that maybe we just don't need that much memory in these chips.

我们稍后会谈到这一点,当我们讨论企业AI时,我认为这是一个非常重要的焦点,它让我对未来和投资股票感到非常兴奋,因为我觉得我们就像一家初创公司,处于企业公司利用人工智能所做事情的前沿,这在我看来与前沿实验室所做的完全不同。无论如何,我们稍后会谈到这一点。

We'll talk about that in a moment as we talk about enterprise AI, which I think is a really important focus and it makes me really excited about the future and investing in stocks because I feel like we're sort of as a startup at the bleeding edge of what enterprise companies are doing with artificial intelligence, which is totally different than in my opinion what the Frontier Labs are doing. Anyway, we'll talk about that in just a moment.

所以Jalapeno推理芯片刚刚由OpenAI通过彭博社宣布。彭博社发布了这篇文章,称OpenAI声称其新芯片在测试中可以超越英伟达的处理器。这款芯片被称为Jalapeno芯片,它在他们的基准测试中击败了GB300。

显然这是有偏见的,我提出这一点是因为这是人们视为风险因素的事情。

So the Jalapeno inference chip was just announced by uh well OpenAI via Bloomberg. So Bloomberg released this article that says OpenAI claims its new chips can outperform Nvidia processors in tests. This chip is called the Jalapeno chip uh and it beats the GB300 in their benchmarking. Obviously this is biased and I'm bringing this up because it is something that people see as a risk factor.

所以,OpenAI现在说,嘿,我们正准备流片这些芯片,可能利好博通。这有点利好整个产业链。

So, OpenAI now like, hey, we're getting ready to tape these out probably bullish Broadcom. It's kind of bullish the whole stack.

这就是OpenAI在这里所说的。OpenAI告诉你,看,我们制造这款芯片不是为了与前沿的尖端训练竞争,用于下一个GPT-56模型或下一个Anthropic寓言模型。我们正在做的是试图创造一款芯片,降低我们提供推理解决方案时的成本结构,我们试图从任何我们能得到的地方获取这些芯片。

And that's what OpenAI is saying here. OpenAI is telling you look we're making this chip not to compete with frontier bleeding edge training for the next GPT56 model or you know the next anthropic fable model. What we're doing is we're trying to create a chip that reduces our cost structure for when we're providing inference solutions and we're trying to get those wherever we can get our hands on.

如果我们能从A6那里得到它们,那太好了。如果我们能从基于SRAM的芯片中获得它们,比如刚刚发布的英伟达Gro,用于超快速令牌生成,超低延迟,对于语音AI客服来说几乎无法察觉的延迟。

那是英伟达的产品。Gro,他们基本上收购了来自Grock或Gro(G R O Q)的所有知识产权,那是另一个竞争对手,与Cerebras的推理芯片相比,那些芯片非常好。我在IPO时讨厌Cerebras,我认为370美元太贵了,但现在它已经大幅下跌,大约从那里跌了一半,我实际上认为这是一个相当不错的交易。这只是关于我对这一切看法的小小旁注。

If we can get them from A6, great. If we can get them from SRAMM based chips like the Nvidia Gro that was just announced for ultraast token generation, super low latency, imperceptible latency for like voice AI customer service. That's an Nvidia product. the Gro they they acquired essentially all the IP from from Grock or Gro G R O Q that's another uh competitor to the Cerebrris inference chips which are really good I hated Cerebrus at IPO I thought $370 was way too expensive but now that it's come down a lot like half from there I actually think it's a pretty good deal just little sidebar notes on where my head is on all of this

你可以看到,现在Frontier Lab说:“嘿,你知道,我们不再只关注英伟达最领先的前沿芯片,比如Vera Rubin芯片。我们也非常关注如何充实我们的推理栈。”英伟达正在意识到这一点,这将成为英伟达的风险因素之一。

you can see there's a lot benefit from the now Frontier Lab saying, "Hey, you know, we're we're not just focused on the greatest leading edge frontier chips from Nvidia anymore, like the Vera Rubin chip. We're also really focused on how can we fill out our inference stack and Nvidia is realizing this and that's going to be one of the risk factors for Nvidia.

这可能就是为什么英伟达以如此便宜的估值出售。英伟达的PEG比率现在大约在69左右,这对英伟达来说是一种侮辱,它太便宜了。这就是为什么我们的股票AI显示这有大约4倍的上行空间,我们的目标价是886美元,基于公允价值,只是因为他们的利润率如此之高。

And it's probably why Nvidia is selling for such a dirt cheap valuation. Nvidia's PEG ratio right now sits at about 69 which is an insult to Nvidia how cheap this is. This is why our stock AI indicates this has like a 4x upside at our price target is $886 for Nvidia uh at at a fair value just because their margins are so high.

那为什么他们卖得这么低?发生了什么?好吧,让我们简化一下,理解为什么英伟达可能会以这么大的折扣出售。好的,首先,你有英伟达。不幸的是,它有这个大公司劣势。你知道,它是5.7万亿美元。

一个5.7万亿美元的股票需要很多才能移动。所以,这使它变得困难。这是它面临的一个不利因素。

Why then are they selling for so much lower? Like what's going on? Well, let's simplify it and understand uh why Nvidia would potentially be selling for this much of a discount. Okay, so first of all, uh you've got Nvidia. It unfortunately has this large company deficit. You know, it's $5.7 trillion. It takes a lot for a $5.7 trillion stock to move. So, that makes it hard. That's one thing it has going against it.

另一件事是,它不是超快速令牌生成领域的唯一竞争者,因为你有Cerebras,他们实际上领先于它。这刚刚与英伟达进入生产,现在它是英伟达的产品,所以应该会表现良好,但Cerebras领先于他们。

Cerebras只需要扩大他们的制造速度,Cerebras预计在2027年和2028年达到规模,可能大约在Gro达到规模的时候。

The other thing is it is not the sole competitor in uh or competitor in ultra fast token generation because you have Cerebrris who's actually ahead of them. This just entered production with Nvidia which it's an Nvidia product now so it should do well but Cerebrris is ahead of them. Cerebrus just needs to scale up how quickly they can manufacture which Cerebrus expects to get to scale in 2027 and 2028 probably around the time that Gro does.

但问题在于,你有两个几乎平等的竞争对手,我几乎会说Cerebras领先,而英伟达在尖端领域有巨大的护城河,你想想Vera Rubin太空计算,公平地说,你有埃隆·马斯克在谈论Vera Rubin太空优化芯片将在2027年第四季度发射到太空,然后在2028年扩大规模。

那很好,但那是有点遥远的事情。那有点像是你的太空Vera Rubin。我现在会称之为希望。那还有点早。所以那被折价了。Grog被折价了。它的规模被折价了。比如,它真的能从这里翻倍吗?

对吧?这就是问题。你知道,Forex将要求这成为一个20万亿美元的公司。基于他们赚多少钱,你可以证明它是合理的,但你是否真的能达到是另一个问题,对吧?

But the issue here is you have almost two equal I would almost say Cerebrus is ahead competitors whereas Nvidia has this big moat in the bleeding edge right you think about like the Vera Rubin uh space compute which in fairness you've got Elon Musk talking about how Vera Rubin space optimized chips are going to get launched into space in Q427 and then scale in 2028. That's great, but that's a bit of a long shot. That's sort of your uh Vera Rubin for space. I would call it uh hope right now. It's it's a little early for that. And so that's getting discounted. Grog is getting discounted. Uh its size is getting discounted. Like can this really 2x from here? Right? That's the problem. You know, Forex is going to require this being like a 20 trillion dollar company. Based on how much money they make, you could justify it, but can you actually get to it is the other question, right?

然后机器人技术仍然非常早期。英伟达刚刚发布了又一个机器人产品,如果你愿意的话。它是Jetson Orin Nano2机器人计算机,用于较低功率的边缘计算。那是未来。但机器人技术再次是未来的希望,可能还需要十年才能真正扩展基于GPU的重视觉训练用于机器人技术。

Then robotics are still very early. Nvidia is uh just announced uh yet another uh sort of robotics release, if you will. It's the Jetson Orin Nano2 robotics computer for sort of lower power edge computing. That is the future. But robotics again, it's a future hope that could be a decade out before we really scale GPU heavy vision-based training for robotics.

所以无论如何,你有这些问题。规模大。这可能Cerebras可能在这里击败他们。我的意思是,他们已经上市了。Cerebras有客户集中风险,与OpenAI有关。他们的一些IPO问题已经去风险化,尤其是现在股票已经下跌了这么多。

所以我现在比那时更喜欢它。Vera Rubin太空更像是未来的期权。机器人是未来的期权。所以,现在很多都归结为利润率。

So anyway, so you've got some of these issues. Large size. This is maybe Cerebrus might be beating them here. I mean, they already are to market. They've got Cerebrus has customer concentration risk with OpenAI. Some of their uh IPO issues have derisked, especially now that the stock has come down as much as it has. So I like it better now than I did then. Vera Rubin uh space is more of a future optionality. Robots are future optionality. So, a lot right now comes down to margins.

而这将成为人们关注的焦点:如果你提价15%,但内存价格的涨幅远高于此,那么你的利润率在财报发布时会有多稳定?因此,有人担心我们可能会看到盈利有所软化,尤其是当一些企业公司的关注点转向推理芯片,而不是这些前沿的尖端芯片时。

And this is going to be the focus from folks is if you're raising prices 15% but memory prices have gone up substantially more than that, how stable are your margins going to be going into earnings? And so there's some nervousness that maybe we'll see some softening of earnings especially as some of the focus from uh enterprise companies goes towards inference chips rather than these bleeding edge frontier chips.

想一想推理芯片。这听起来可能疯狂,但任何配备5090 GPU的游戏PC基本上都足以运行许多企业级人工智能。你甚至不必购买我们所购买的Blackwell 6000。我们买了几块Blackwell 6000芯片。

我们是在它们售价7000美元时购买的。我们在这块芯片上赚了一倍。我甚至不知道。我甚至不认为股票在芯片翻倍的时间内翻倍了,对吧?所以这有点疯狂,但很多企业级AI并不需要这种内存水平。

你不需要96 GB的DDR7余量。你可以用5090处理很多企业级推理,它的尺寸只有这个的三分之一,配备32 GB的VRAM。

Think about inference chips for a moment. This sounds crazy, but the gaming PC uh that operates or any gaming PC that operates on a 5090 GPU is pretty much good enough to run a lot of enterprise artificial intelligence. You don't even have to buy what we did, which is a Blackwell 6000. We've bought, you know, a few of these Blackwell 6000 chips. We bought these back when they were $7,000. We 2xed our money on the damn chip. Like, I don't even know. I don't even think the stock 2xed in the time that the chip 2xed, right? Uh, so it's kind of crazy, but a lot of enterprise AI does not need this memory level. You don't need 96 GB of DDR7 headroom. You can handle a lot of enterprise uh, inference with a 5090, which operates at a third of the size of this on a 32 GB uh, uh, you know, VRAM set.

那么这意味着什么呢?这意味着你可能会看到公司更倾向于选择博通的A6、谷歌的TPU(预计明年扩展规模)、或Marvell的A6、或英伟达的5090或6000,而不是前沿的Vera Rubin芯片。

在我看来,这就是英伟达开始说“嘿,我们实际上要减少这些大型前沿芯片上的内存量”的原因,因为企业应用实际上不需要那些大型芯片堆栈上的那么多内存。

So what does that mean? Well, what that means is you might end up seeing companies preferring A6 from Broadcom, Google TPUs, which are expecting to scale next year, uh, or Marll A6, uh, or Nvidia 5090s or 6000s over the bleeding edge Vera Rubin chips. That, in my opinion, is why Nvidia is starting to say, "Hey, we're actually going to downsize how much memory we're putting on these massive frontier uh uh chips because the enterprise applications don't actually need that much memory on those big chip stacks."

所以,社交媒体上有很多传言,说他们减少了芯片中的内存量。这是缩水式通胀,你知道,他们在偷工减料。我认为他们这样做是为了降低成本,并使其对企业真正有用,因为芯片变得太大了。我们不需要这些巨大的堆栈,因为你可以用这些小芯片做很多工作。

So, there's been a lot of rumoring in social media over, oh, they're reducing how much memory they're putting in the chips. This is shrinkflation, you know, they're they're cutting corners. I think it's so they could keep the cost down and actually make it useful for enterprises because the chips are getting too big. We don't need these massive stacks because you could do so much work with these little chips.

我认为他们这样做是为了降低成本,并使其对企业真正有用,因为芯片变得太大了。我们不需要这些巨大的堆栈,因为你可以用这些小芯片做很多工作。

I think it's so they could keep the cost down and actually make it useful for enterprises because the chips are getting too big. We don't need these massive stacks because you could do so much work with these little chips.

你可以真的拿一块售价4900美元(我认为是零售价)的芯片,这还不是批量价格,对吧?你现在就可以拿一块英伟达5090 RTX芯片。哦,它们又涨了200美元。你在开玩笑吗?这些芯片真的是4900美元。

至少在这家商店只剩一件库存了。但不管怎样,你知道,上周还是4900美元。什么?而且交付要等到九月。那太愚蠢了。所以无论如何,是的,我的意思是,这些芯片正在售罄。

You could literally take a $4,900 I think is the retail price. That's not even what you could get them at bulk pricing, right? You could take an Nvidia 5090 RTX chip right now. Oh, they've gone up another $200. Are you kidding me? These were literally $4,900. one left in stock at least on this store. Uh but anyway, you know, this was $4,900 like last week. What? And the delivery, you can't even get it until September. That's stupid. Uh so anyway, yeah, I mean, these are selling out.

这些芯片售罄的原因之一是,你可以拿一家像Mona这样的公司,他们正在利用人工智能最大化其客户的治疗速度,做得非常出色。在我看来,你可以在5090 GPU上做他们用人工智能做的事情,而不需要那些疯狂的Vera Rubin CPU。

One of the reasons these are selling out is because you can take a company like Mona who's doing fantastic work with using artificial intelligence to maximize their speed to therapies for their clients. You could, in my opinion, do what they're doing with artificial intelligence on a 5090 GPU and you don't need these crazy uh Vera Rubin CPUs.

在我看来,你可以在5090 GPU上做他们用人工智能做的事情,而不需要那些疯狂的Vera Rubin CPU。

You could, in my opinion, do what they're doing with artificial intelligence on a 5090 GPU and you don't need these crazy uh Vera Rubin CPUs.

问题是,这些游戏GPU对英伟达来说利润率低于那些400万美元的大型机架。

The problem is these gaming GPUs are lower margin for Nvidia than the big $4 million racks.

关键在于,企业AI正朝着更小的芯片发展,而不是更大的芯片。

The point of that is enterprise AI is going towards smaller chips, not bigger chips.

我个人认为,在这里,前沿代币将占大约10%的份额。劳动力将占大约45%的份额。企业占45%的份额。你知道,大概就是这样。而这只会占大约10%的份额。这是我对企业的看法。我可能错了,但这就是我的想法,我的投资论点围绕AS6构建,而不是试图销售前沿级别的芯片。

I personally think this right here, frontier tokens will represent like 10% of the slice. Labor will represent like 45% of the slice. Enterprise 45% of the slice. You know, it's probably something like that. And this would only be about 10% of the slice. That's my take for enterprise. I I could be wrong about that, but that's where my head is and that's where my investing thesis builds around uh AS6 rather than trying to sell the frontier level chips.

我们看到很多公司这样做,坦白说,很多芯片的投资回收期大约是一到两年。我们在课程会员直播中计算了一些。记住,你总是可以在那里获得我们的交易提醒。查看长期投资组合,我们如何为未来十年投资,我们如何配置。

但是,嗯,在周五之前加入meetke.com。我们那里有一个大的到期。但是,嗯,你知道,我们计算了一些盈亏平衡期,我们觉得,是的,你知道,我们的芯片基本上已经为自己支付了。所以,短期回收期的想法有一些合理性。

问题是,这些回收期能持续多久?待定,对吧?这些是我们监控的现货价格。现货价格如何转化为长期合同?我们最终会看到。

We're seeing a lot of companies do that and the payback periods are honestly like one to two years on a lot of those chips. We were calculating some of this in uh in our course member live stream. Remember, you can always get our trade alerts over there. See the long-term portfolio, how we're investing for the next decade, how we're allocating. But, um, join that over at meetke.com before Friday. We got a big expiration there. But, uh, you know, we were calculating some of the break even periods and we're like, yeah, you know, our chips have basically already paid for themselves. So, there is some reasonleness to the idea of short payback periods. The question is, how long are those pay payback periods going to last like that? To be determined, right? Those are the spot prices we're monitoring. How do the spot prices turn into long-term contracts? We'll end up seeing.

但Thomas Reuters也在这样做。他们刚刚宣布他们正在使用Qwen,这是阿里巴巴的开放权重模型,他们认为他们落后于大型前沿模型三到四个月,成本只是其一小部分。他们保留自己的数据。

所以,他们可以将自己的数据内部化。Mona可以将自己的数据内部化。Reinvest可以将自己的数据内部化。我们不必把所有数据发送给实验室。

But Thomas Reuters is doing this as well. They just announced uh that they're using Quen, which is Alibaba's open weight model, and they think they're 3 to four months behind the big frontiers at a fraction of the cost. And they keep their own data. So, they get to in-house their own data. Mona gets to in-house their own data. Reinvest gets to in-house its own data. We don't have to send it all to the labs.

问题是,如果英伟达现在销售更少的前沿芯片和更多的企业芯片,这可能会在未来损害其利润率。你会看到压缩。现在,这些是人们担心的关于英伟达的一些问题。对于接下来的这次财报,我并不真正担心,因为我认为英伟达太便宜了,而且我认为股价已经消化了很多。

再说一次,如果你以69倍的市盈率交易,那太便宜了。

The problem is that's bad for margins for Nvidia potentially in the future if they're now selling fewer of those Frontier chips and more of the enterprise chips. You get compression there. Now, those are some of the issues that people are worried about with Nvidia. I'm not really worried about that just for this next earning set because I think Nvidia is just so cheap and I think the stock has already discounted a lot of that. Again, if you're trading for a 69 peg, it's dirt cheap.

所以,这些是英伟达的财务数据。这些是我们对英伟达的数字。8月25日的当前增长预测是,到年底他们将产生9美元的每股收益,他们的增长率预计为44%、24%、87%,然后是负22%。

所以你在十年末确实看到增长有所放缓。这相当于大约33%的平均增长率。这意味着他们目前的市盈率约为69倍,这非常便宜。

So, these are the Nvidia financials right here. And these are the numbers we have for Nvidia. The current growth forecast for August 25th are that uh at the end of the year they will generate $9 of earnings per share and their growth rate is expected to be 44 24 87 and then negative 22%. So you do have sort of a a curving out on growth at the end of the decade. That works out to about an average growth rate of about 33%. which uh means they're trading for about a 69 peg right now which is very cheap.

部分原因可能是大约四年后预测会出现负增长。那可能是因为我们看到前沿训练芯片变得不那么关键,而推理芯片(就像OpenAI与博通合作制造的jalapeno)接管了。

Part of that could be because there is negative growth forecast in about four years. That could be as we see Frontier trip chips become less critical and the inference chips much like the jalapeno from OpenAI created in partnership with Broadcom taking over.

那么,现在对英伟达真正利好的因素有哪些?嗯,5000亿美元的数据中心融资,以及美国证券交易委员会修改资产支持证券化规则。这太疯狂了。这有点像2008年的情况,美国证券交易委员会说,嘿,如果你要为数据中心出售资产支持证券,你不再需要保留5%的风险自留,因为我们认为这次情况不同。

哦,我们还会放宽规则,说你实际上不必披露这些资产支持证券的组成部分或这些数据中心内部的利用率。对我来说,这听起来像是2008年重演。我不喜欢这样。

Now, what's like what are some things that are really bullish for Nvidia right now? Well, $500 billion of financing for data centers and the SEC changing the assetbacked uh securization rules. That's freaking crazy. Okay, that's like 2008 kind of stuff where the SEC says, "Hey, you no longer need 5% skin in the game if you're going to sell asset back securities for data centers because we think this time is different." Oh, we're also going to loosen the rules and say you don't actually have to disclose what the components of these assetbacked securities are or what the utilization rates are inside these data centers. To me, that sounds like 2008 all over again. I don't like that.

这些规则短期利好,更多债务,但也更多支出。但这里有一个讽刺之处。对冲基金持有Meta、甲骨文、谷歌、英伟达的头寸,因为英伟达的信用违约互换也在上升。买入英伟达或Meta和谷歌,然后用信用违约互换对冲的对冲基金,现在实际上在两边都赚钱。

想想这有多奇怪。通常,对冲意味着如果英伟达股价上涨,看跌合约会下跌。但这里的情况并非如此。在这种情况下,随着英伟达上涨,信用违约互换对冲实际上也在上涨。所以,如果你持有英伟达并持有信用违约互换,英伟达上涨是因为更多债务进入系统,创造更多支出。

英伟达股价上涨,而额外的债务让人们感到紧张。所以,信用违约互换上涨,然后你的对冲实际上上涨,这将是你的保险计划,以防英伟达违约,对吧?所以,奇怪的是,我们现在处于这样一个位置,对冲基金可以真正对冲,并看到他们的对冲和股票同时上涨。

如果英伟达或甲骨文或其他公司下跌,那些信用违约互换,讽刺的是,可能仍然会上涨。所以,这有点像最好的对冲。股票下跌,你的对冲上涨。股票因更多债务融资而上涨,你的对冲上涨。这几乎让你只想买入信用违约互换。

Those rules are short-term bullish, more debt, but also more spending. But there's an irony here. Hedge funds who were exposed to Meta, Oracle, Google, Nvidia, because Nvidia credit default swaps are also rising. hedge funds who are buying Nvidia or Meta and Google and then they're hedging with credit default swaps are actually winning on both sides right now. Think about how weird that is. Usually, usually a hedge would mean if Nvidia stock goes up, a put contract would go down. But that's not what's happening here as a hedge. In this case, as Nvidia goes up, credit default swap hedges are actually going up. So, if you own Nvidia and you own credit default swaps, Nvidia goes up because there's more debt going into the system creating more spending. Nvidia stock goes up and that extra debt then makes people nervous. So, credit default swaps go up and then your hedge actually goes up, which would be your insurance plan in case Nvidia defaulted, right? So, weirdly, we're at a place right now where hedge funds can literally hedge and see their hedges and their stocks both go positive together at the same time. Uh, if Nvidia or Oracle or whatever go down, those CDS's, ironically, might still go up. So, it's sort of like the best hedge. The stock goes down, your hedge goes up. The uh stock goes up because of more debt financing, your hedge goes up. It almost makes you just want to buy credit default swaps.

但想想其他对英伟达利好的因素。SpaceX的支出,800亿美元的支出或800亿美元的IPO融资。他们可能还会再筹集3000到4000亿美元。Nebas有80亿美元现金。谷歌刚刚筹集了860亿美元用于资本支出。

Anthropic的IPO即将到来。是的,每个人都想分一杯羹,得到这些芯片的一部分。是的,在我看来,我们将看到更多向推理芯片和企业芯片的转变,而不是这些前沿芯片。但到目前为止,考虑到所有这些,英伟达看起来相当便宜。

But think about the other things that are bullish for Nvidia. SpaceX spending, $80 billion of spending or $80 billion raised on IPO. They're probably going to raise another three to $400 billion. Uh Nebas has $8 billion of cash on hand. Google had just raised $86 billion for uh for Capex. You've got the Anthropic IPO coming. Yes, everybody wants their hand in the cookie jar to get a piece of these chips. Yes, we're going to see more movement towards inference chips and enterprise chips versus these Frontier chips in my opinion. But so far, Nvidia looks pretty freaking discounted for all of that uh you know in mind.

所以这是一堆基于服务器的英伟达和CPU研究。GB200到300系列预计在第三季度增长20%到30%。实际上最终增长了约15%。所以比预期略低。服务器CPU交付量预计在2027年增长50%,这非常棒。

就在这里。英伟达或英特尔的CPU产能已售罄至2027年或到2027年。它说Blackwell产品的价格预计仍会上涨,但尚未发生。它们刚刚发生。这是在价格上涨前几天发布的。成本增加主要是内存,因为GPU价格不变,英伟达已确保足够的供应。

所以这确实表明我们预计所有注意力都在利润率上。你们提高的价格是否足以抵消内存成本增加?这将是英伟达财报中关注的焦点。

So this is a uh a bunch of server based research for Nvidia and CPUs. GB200s to 300s had were expected to increase by 20 to 30% in Q3. Those actually ended up getting increased by about 15%. So a bit lower than expected. Server CPU deliveries are expected to rise 50% in uh 2027 which is really fantastic. Uh that's right here. uh Nvidia or Intel CPU capacity is sold out through 2027 or into 2027. It says price increases are still expected on Blackwell products, but they haven't happened yet. They just happened. This was published like days before the price increases. The cost increases are mostly memory as GPU prices are unchanged and Nvidia has secured enough supply. So that does indicate we expect all that attention on margin. Did you guys raise prices enough to offset the memory cost increases? That's where there's going to be a lot of focus on Nvidia earnings.

我们这里有RTX 6000,我刚刚在亚马逊上展示过,其建议零售价从8000美元涨到了11000美元。所以,你在企业芯片上提高了37%的价格,因为需求就在那里,这相当令人印象深刻。我同意这一点。

We've got um the RTX 6000 right here, which we I just showed on Amazon, has gotten an increase on its MSRP from $8,000 to $11,000. So, you are increasing the prices 37% on enterprise chips because that is where the demand is going, which is pretty impressive. I agree with that.

Edgewater还认为,英伟达可能开始感受到开放权重模型的一些压力,这就是他们进入的原因。你知道,他们花费60亿美元与Poolside合作推出自己的开放权重模型。但他们也可能试图与Deep Seeks和Moonshots竞争,正如他们在这里提到的,开放权重的中国大语言模型。

Edgewater also argues that Nvidia might be starting to feel some pressure on uh openw weightight models which is why they're getting in. You know, they're spending $6 billion to get in with poolside to launch their own openweight models. But they're also possibly trying to compete against the Deep Seeks and the Moonshots as they mentioned here, open weight Chinese LLMs.

我提到我认为正在发生的是支出经济化。所以,嘿,如果人们不需要,我们为什么要给这些芯片加载这么多内存?让我们削减内存,降低这些芯片的入门成本,让这些GPU进入人们手中,减少内存支出占比例,然后让他们应用他们的企业AI。

And I mention that I think what's happening is there's an economizing of spend going on. So, hey, why are we going to overload these chips with all this memory if people don't need it? Let's cut the memory, cut the entry cost for these chips, get these GPUs into the hands of people, uh spend less on memory as a proportion of that and then let them go apply their enterprise uh AI.

再说一次,问题最终是Vera Rubin与RTX 6000的利润率是多少?这可能就是为什么我们刚刚看到RTX 6000的建议零售价上涨了37.5%,因为企业正在向那里转移。

Again, though, the question is ultimately what is the margin for a Vera Rubin versus an RTX 6000? And that's probably why we just saw the RTX 6000 go up 37 and a half percent in MSRP because that's where enterprises are moving to.

再说一次,他们预计会像历史上一样全面超出预期,但这不是推动股价的因素。推动股价的是我们听到的关于利润率、前沿芯片部署、与开放权重竞争、低利润率企业的消息。这些是我们将寻找的危险信号。

Uh again, they're expected to beat across the board as they historically have, but that's not what's going to move the stock. What's going to move the stock is what we hear about margins, frontier chip deployment, competition against open weight, lower margin enterprise. Those are the red flags we're going to look for.

我们真的认为Gro一定会比Cerebras的SRAM推理芯片更好吗?我们不知道。我们会看到。还有待观察。所有这些事情实际上都是次要的。游戏业务预计将继续下滑。那也是次要的。所以,对于这些,我并不特别兴奋。一切都关乎前沿支出。

Do we think Gro is really going to definitely be better than Cerebrris for an SRAMM inference chip? We don't know. We'll see. Remains to be seen. All those things are really a sideeshow. Gaming is expected to continue to decline. That's also a sideeshow. So, not jumping up and down about really caring about any of that. It's all about that frontier spend.

真正利好的是,确实有很多循环融资在进行。大量资金流入,嗯,你知道,Anthropic的IPO可能至少。我认为S1文件发布后,他们会筹集大量资金,然后他们会把钱花在芯片上,甚至购买自己的芯片,或者花在Neoclouds上,比如NBIS或其他。

And what's really bullish is that you do have a lot of circular financing going on. A lot of money flowing into the um uh you know anthropic IPO likely at least. I think that S1 drops they'll raise a lot of money and they'll just spend it on chips, buy their own ships even or or spend it on uh the Neoclouds like an NBIS or or whatever.

我们还将关注英伟达对其他公司的投资。你不会看到它作为资本支出。它不会显示为资本支出,因为你知道资本支出会显示在不动产、厂房和设备中。你实际上会在其上方看到,在购买非有价证券和有价债务及股权证券中。

你可以看到这里大约260亿美元的投资支出,这样他们投资的公司就可以购买更多英伟达产品。所以这就是一些循环指控的来源。我们也会关注这一点。

Another thing we'll be looking at is Nvidia's investments into other companies. You'll be able to see that not as capex. It doesn't show up as capex because you know capital expenditures will show up here in PPE. Where you'll actually see it is right above that in purchases of non-marketable securities and marketable debt and equity securities. And you can see this about $26 billion of spend right here in investments so that those companies they're investing in can go buy more Nvidia product. So that's where some of the circular allegations come from. So we'll be watching for that as well.

我实际上认为这会在今天和明天创造逢低买入的机会,因为我不认为我们很快会陷入衰退。所以我认为未来几天有逢低买入的机会。

I actually think that creates a buy the dip opportunity today and tomorrow because I, you know, I don't think we're on the turn of a recession uh anytime soon. So I think there's an opportunity to buy the dip over the next couple days.

我们会尝试一点广告,看看效果如何。恭喜你,伙计。你做了很多。人们喜欢你。人们尊敬你。Kevin Praath,金融分析师和YouTuber。Meet Kevin。总是很高兴听到你的观点。

We'll we'll try a little advertising and see how it goes. Congratulations, man. You have done so much. People love you. People look up to you. Kevin Praath there, financial analyst and YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great to get your take.

以上 59 段为这条视频中谈及 $NVDA 的全部内容。逐字对不上字幕的段落不会收录。

他说在等什么

他自己说在等的东西,一段话一条记录。同一件事说过几次就出现几次,我们不合并,也不判断它有没有兑现。

earnings report with focus on margins, frontier chip deployment, and competition from open-weight models
暂无中文转述,仅英文原句可核对。
他没有说用什么来检验

这个频道对 $NVDA 的历次判断

Meet Kevin 在这只股票上共 3 条判断,这里只列相邻的几条。

2026-08-25看涨本条
这基本上是对总可寻址市场的彻底重新定义,因为这基本上相当于2025年美国整个GDP的100%,这对英伟达来说听起来可能是看涨的。
方向翻转
2026-08-24看跌
所以,让我们明确一点,他说得确实很好,我尊重Zach所做的一切。所有这些听起来都很好,但看看我们多么快地略过了这些事情。我的意思是,他说了三个词。我得暂停一下来解释。
原话 11:54 ›
看完整历史 ›
这一页只记录说话人自己说过的话,不做判断、不下结论。研究辅助,非投资建议。
TICKERRECEIPTS