在当前较高的收益率水平下,Realty Income 具备吸引力,预期回报可达 8-10%,在利率逆风与股息增长及估值支撑之间取得平衡。
逐段跳播
Realty Income 成为一家有意思的公司。投资回报率正在上升。过去五年该股表现平平,但业务、房地产以及其他一切仍在继续发挥各自的作用。
Realty Income becomes an interesting company. The return on investment is increasing. The stock hasn't achieved much in the past five years, but business, real estate, and everything else continues to play its part.
因此,现在可能是过去五年中任何时候都更好的时机,来重新审视这家公司。说到 Realty Income,它曾经是房地产投资信托中的女王,拥有月度分红之类的东西。
Therefore, now might be the best time than at any time in the past five years to take another look at this company. When it comes to Realty Income, she used to be the queen of real estate investment trusts with monthly dividends and things like that.
但我们现在在 iShares 美国 REIT 指数中排名第七。
But we are now ranked seventh in the iShares US REIT Index.
当 10 年期美国国债收益率为 2% 时,你会对 Realty Income 3.54% 的回报感到满意。现在,10 年期美国国债收益率为 5.2%。现在你会想要更多 Realty Income。
when the yield on a 10-year Treasury note is at 2%, you feel good about a 3.54% return from Realty Income. Now, the yield on 10-year Treasury bonds is 5.2%. Now you want more Realty Income.
我们的股息率为 5.8%,这意味着市场仍有调整的空间。我认为,当 10 年期美国国债收益率稳定在 5.2% 时,因为那是从大约 4% 突然上行的走势,而当时市场预期利率会更低,这很可能已经反映在 Realty Income 的价格中了。
We are at 5.8% dividend yield, which means there is still room for market adjustment. I think when the 10-year Treasury yield settles at 5.2%, because that was a sudden move upward from, say, 4% with expectations of lower rates, which was probably priced in at Realty Income.
如果这只是暂时的飙升并且会回落,那就没问题。但如果它稳定在这个水平,你可以预期 Realty Income 跌到 7%,这意味着还会再下跌 15-20%。
If this is just a temporary spike and it will return, then it's okay. But if it stabilizes at this level, you can expect a 7% Realty Income, which means an additional 15-20% decrease.
它主要基于零售,但我们有杂货店、家居装修店、一元店、餐厅等等。它是多元化的,但聚焦于零售。他们现在正在从零售板块分散出去,这在房地产公司 Realty Inc. 起步时是很好的。
It is mostly based on retail, but we have grocery stores, home improvement stores, dollar stores, restaurants, etc. It is diverse, but focuses on retail. They are now diversifying away from the retail sector, which was great when the real estate company Realty Inc. started.
不过,他们现在正在多元化,甚至已经扩展到欧洲和英国。目前的入住率很好,而它最低的水平,比如说,在危机期间是 96%。
But well, they are diversifying now, they have even expanded into Europe and the United Kingdom. The occupancy rate is currently good, and its lowest level, let's say, during the crisis was 96%.
然而,如果你看看自首次公开募股以来在利率更低环境下的房地产投资信托(REITs),它们以显著的数字跑赢了标普 500。这是标普 500 指数表现的两倍多。
However, if you look at real estate investment trusts (REITs) with lower interest rates since their initial public offering, they have outperformed the S&P 500 by significant numbers.
This is more than double the performance of the S&P 500 index.
即使是定期派发股息的公司,也跑赢了所有那些 AI 巨头公司。在这四十二年里,这极其有意思。我们有良好的股息派发、良好的房地产、优质的租户,以及出色的信用评级。
Even companies that regularly distribute dividends have outperformed all the giant AI companies. This is extremely interesting over these forty-two years. We have good dividend payouts, good real estate, great tenants, and excellent credit ratings.
所以,当你说“好吧,这是不是值得拥有的东西?”时,事情开始变得有意思了。他们正在略微多元化,向数据中心和工业领域拓展,但主导焦点仍然是零售。在养老中心和欧洲的多元化。
So, when you say, "Okay, is this something worth owning?" Things are starting to get interesting. They are diversifying slightly, towards data centers and industry, but the dominant focus remains on retail.
Diversity in elderly care centers, and in Europe.
我们面前有一个巨大的市场。但如今发生变化的是过去五年的利率,正如我们之前提到的,从持续下降变为现在超过5%。这份演示材料是8月份的,所以内容已经不再是最新的了。
Well, we have a huge market ahead of us. But what has changed now is interest rates over the past five years, from being in constant decline as we mentioned earlier to exceeding 5% now.
This presentation is from August, so things are no longer up-to-date.
然而,当利率上升时,所有原本有利于房地产投资和房地产投资信托的因素如今都发生了逆转,这直接给公司带来了压力。但工作仍在进行中。他们只是在收取物业的费用。出租率不错。即使在困难时期,他们也必须能够生存下去。
However, when interest rates rise, all the factors that were beneficial to real estate investments and real estate investment trusts are now reversed, and this simply puts pressure on the company.
But the work is still ongoing. They are simply collecting fees on their properties. The occupancy rate is good. Even in difficult times, they must be able to survive.
即使他们不得不做出某种财务调整,因为这涉及息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)。这导致息税折旧摊销前利润减少2%。
Even if they have to make some kind of financial adjustment because this relates to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). This results in a 2% reduction in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.
债务可能会略有上升,然后我们可能会违反那些承诺,情况会变得更糟,具体取决于衰退或危机持续多久。该股暴跌了50%,就像当时其他房地产股票一样。
Debt may rise slightly, and then we may breach those commitments, and things will get worse depending on how long the recession or crisis lasts. The stock collapsed by 50%, like the rest of the real estate stocks at that time.
如果发生严重的衰退,伴随利率上升、滞胀、出租率下降和负债率上升,那将是该股最糟糕的情形,我假设它还会进一步下跌。
If a terrible recession occurs with rising interest rates, stagflation, declining occupancy, and rising debt ratios, that would be the worst-case scenario for the stock, and I would assume it would fall even further.
然而,当你看看这家公司的情况,如果出现通胀,随着合同续签的时候到来,他们应该能够提高那些租金。
However, when you look at what the company is like, if there is inflation, they should be able to increase those rents as the time comes to renew the contracts.
而且他们每年将租金提高5%、6%或7%。随着时间推移,这些租金上涨加上更低的利率,使他们能够每年将股息派发提高4%。
And every year they increase the rents by 5%, 6% or 7%. Over time, those rent increases combined with lower interest rates allow them to increase their dividend payouts by 4% annually.
坏时期没有增长,好时期增长良好。如果前方是艰难时期,没有人指望增长,但你必须把这一点应用到你的投资组合策略中。
No growth in bad times, good growth in good times. If tough times are ahead, no one expects growth, but you have to apply that to your portfolio strategy.
所以就业务而言,它是好的,但它仍然是一个零售行业。
So, as far as business is concerned, it's good, but it's still a retail sector.
还必须考虑5年、10年或15年后零售行业的状态。一方面,他们说总体趋势是老龄化和退休。这是否意味着那些门店的客流量会更多还是更少?
One must also consider the state of the retail sector 5, 10 or 15 years from now. On the one hand, they say that the general trend is towards aging and retirement. Does this mean more or less foot traffic in those stores?
这也是需要牢记的一点。我还要继续押注零售行业多久?当然,还有我们稍后将讨论的内在价值以及其他一切,以什么价格?
This is also something to keep in mind. How long will I continue to bet on the retail sector? And of course, what we will discuss later regarding intrinsic value and everything else, at what price?
主要风险是会发生真正的衰退,就像大多数可用的投资一样。
The main risk is that a real recession will occur, as is the case with most available investments.
让我们讨论一下财务数据。然后,如果我们看资产负债表,它当然是由债务融资的,杠杆覆盖率是五倍,好的。然而,调整后的息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)会受到经济衰退时期的影响。因此,在景气不佳的时期,这些排名会发生变化。
Let's discuss the financial data. Then, if we look at the balance sheet, it is of course debt-financed and the leverage coverage ratio is five times, okay. However, adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) are affected by recessionary times. So, in bad times, those rankings change.
于是,这些公司会变得有些担忧,但并不是在信贷层面上的担忧。这是最坏的情形。主要问题是,公司能否在这种情形下存活下来?我认为它能存活,因为它处于相对有利的一面,而且它们已经开始适应高利率环境。
Then, these companies become somewhat worried, but not in a credit-related sense. This is the worst-case scenario. The main question is, will the company survive that scenario?
I think it will survive because it is on the better side of things, and they have already begun to adapt to the high interest rate environment.
这究竟只是对数字的表面修饰,还是真正为了股东利益而对利息成本进行管理,我并不知道。
Whether this is merely a cosmetic change to the numbers or a genuine management of the cost of interest for the benefit of shareholders, I do not know.
因为确实,这里可转换债券的利率不是 6%,而是 3.5%。然而,如果进展顺利,未来这会稀释股东的持股比例。然后它们与 Apollo 成立合资企业,带来类似股权的回报,这意味着没有债务,但归根结底,这仍是债务,取决于它是如何构建的、可再生装机容量以及诸如此类的事情。
Because yes, the interest rates here with convertible bonds are not 6% but 3.5%. However, if things go well, it will reduce shareholders' stakes in the future. Then they enter into joint ventures with Apollo with equity-like returns, which means no debt, but ultimately, it is debt, depending on how it is structured, renewable capacities, and things like that.
它们现在也在筹集价值略低的股份、私人资本、保险资本以及新的债务来源,因为这些公开债券已经变得更贵,而且竞争非常激烈。
They are also now raising slightly lower-value shares, private capital, insurance capital, and new debt sources because these public bonds have become more expensive and are highly competitive.
从业绩指引来看,它似乎是可接受且稳定的。业绩指引已被下调至略低的水平,但这在利率上升的情况下是正常的。
Looking at the guidance, it appears acceptable and stable. The guidance has been revised to be slightly lower, but this is normal with rising interest rates.
除此之外,一切似乎都很稳定。我们有一项收益,也许这是最主要的方面,在一年之内从 5.5 亿上升到 6 亿,这是显著的增长。
Apart from that, everything seems stable. We have, perhaps this is the main aspect, benefits rising from 550 million to 600 million over the course of a year, that's significant growth.
那是什么?利息成本上升 9%。这从可分配利润中削减了 5000 万,并阻碍了那里利润的增长。净债务 250 亿。假设 4% 的成本等于 10 亿。如果我们往上走,这个数字将达到 12 亿。利率为 6%,或者 7%。
What is it? A 9% increase in interest costs. This cuts 50 million from distributed profits, and prevents the growth of those profits there. 25 billion in net debt. Let's assume that the cost at 4% was equal to one billion.
If we go higher, the number will reach 1.2 billion. Interest of 6%, or 7%.
如果高利率时期持续更长时间,它可能达到 15 亿,这将直接吞噬房地产投资信托(REIT)投资者在过去四十年里所享有的增长。
If the period of high interest rates continues for a longer time, it could reach 1.5 billion, which would simply devour the growth that real estate investment trust (REIT) investors have enjoyed over the past forty years.
但可转换债券正在发挥作用,然而,如果我们看看此前发行的票息,就连 Google 现在也以 6% 的利率发债。因此,如果利率上升,我们应当假设利息成本会更高。
But well, convertible bonds are having an effect, however, if we look at previously issued coupons, even Google is now issuing at 6% interest. Therefore, we should assume higher interest costs if interest rates rise.
如果这种情况持续下去,它将继续对该股构成压力,我们可能会看到进一步下跌。然而,另一方面,你有市场想要的东西。在高利率下,市场想要更高的回报。
If this continues over time, it will continue to put pressure on the stock, and we may see further declines. However, on the other hand, you have what the market wants. The market, under high interest rates, wants higher returns.
如果你持有它,你会得到什么?你会得到比利率为 3% 时更高的回报,而这就是我当时的看法。我一直说,3% 时的房地产投资信托(REIT)是有风险的。如果利率上升,你不会赚到多少。
If you own it, what will you get? You will get a higher return than when the rate was 3%, and that was my opinion at the time. I have always said that real estate investment trusts (REITs) at 3% are risky. If interest rates rise, you won't earn much.
现在,随着利率上升,这很有意思,因为无论发生什么,你都能得到一些回报。如果利率达到15%,那么情况当然会很糟。但得益于5%到6%的回报,你仍然在缓解这一跌幅。
Now, with rising interest rates, it's interesting because no matter what happens, you get something in return. If interest rates reach 15%, then of course the situation will be bad.
But you are still mitigating this decline thanks to a return of between 5% and 6%.
随着利率上升,一切过去起正面作用的因素都开始起负面作用。更高的回报、上升的债务成本以及略有下降的房产价值,都在给这只股票施加压力。
With rising interest rates, everything that used to work positively began to work negatively. Higher returns, rising debt costs, and slightly declining property values are putting pressure on the stock.
但是,如果价格趋势最终反转,一切都会反过来起作用,股价上涨50%达到70-80,我也不会感到意外。股东权益接近400亿,而市值为520亿。所以,在这些数值下,我们离那个水平并不远。
But, if the price trend eventually reverses, everything will work in reverse, and I wouldn't be surprised to see a 50% improvement in the stock price to reach 70-80. Shareholders' equity is close to 40 billion, and the market value is 52 billion. So, at these values, we are not far from that.
杠杆指标看起来可以接受。净债务与企业总价值之比为44%,而不是40%。所以,它不算出色,但也不算风险极高。我见过糟糕得多的比率。
The leverage metrics appear acceptable. 44%, not 40% as net debt to total enterprise value. So, it's not excellent, but it's not extremely risky either. I have seen much worse ratios.
关于Realty Income,点击这里即可,主要切入点就是3美元的股息。如果我们只有2%的增长率,而市场对未来的股息率满足于5%,那么10%收益率的內在价值就接近当前的股价。
For Realty Income, just click here, and the main entry point is the $3 dividend. If we have a growth rate of only 2%, and the market is satisfied with a dividend yield of 5% going forward, then the intrinsic value of a 10% yield is close to the current share price.
在更乐观的增长率下,一切顺利、利率更低,且市场满足于4%的股息率,最终的倍数是100除以25,等于4%。这就是我跟你说过的那个作为积极方面的七十。
With more optimistic growth rates, everything going well, interest rates lower, and the market satisfied with a 4% dividend yield, the final multiple is 100 divided by 25, which equals 4%.
This is the seventy I told you about as a positive aspect.
在最坏的情况下,假设利率继续对股息率施压,将其压低到7%的要求回报率。当前价值在四十多,但那样你会得到更高的股息,可以再投资并积累你的投资组合价值。
In the worst-case scenario, let's say interest rates continue to put pressure on the dividend yield, bringing it down to the required rate of 7%. The current value is in the forties, but then you get higher dividends that you can reinvest and build the value of your portfolio.
所以,当我们转到对比表时,它并不很便宜,但它给你带来不错的回报,比如"Ahold"。所以,也许在比较这些选项时,我们得到的是未来9%的潜在回报,且风险更低,这并不差。
So, when we move to the comparative table, it is not very cheap, but it gives you a good return, like "Ahold" for example. So, perhaps when comparing these options, we get a potential return with a lower risk of 9% in the future, which is not bad.
说到价值投资方格,9%的房地产持有,以美元计,我得把它放在较好的一侧。如果我能在这个周末完成,我会重新整理一下这个,让它看起来更舒服。我们会着手处理这件事。
When it comes to the value investment square, 9% real estate ownership, in US dollars, I have to put it on the better side. I will reorganize this perhaps if I can get it done over the weekend to make it more comfortable for the eyes. We will work on that.
所以,关于预期回报,我们已经有股息了。如果底层业务继续增长,情况应该没问题。主要风险是高利率环境,但如果没有发生什么疯狂的事,随着租约续签上涨,通胀会起到缓冲作用。
So, regarding expected returns, we already have dividends. If the underlying business continues to grow, things should be fine. The main risk is a high interest rate environment, but if nothing crazy happens, there is inflation cushioning with rising lease renewals.
预期回报在8%到10%之间,你可以用这个构建一些东西。主要风险是衰退的严重程度。我来自欧洲,所以我认为我应该为这些房地产投资信托支付40%的预扣税或类似的东西。我不知道克罗地亚是否与美国有协议,但我有6%的欧洲公司。所以,对我来说,目前它并不太有意思。
Expected return is between 8 and 10%, and you can build something with this. The main risk is the severity of the recession. I am from Europe, so I believe I should pay a 40% withholding tax or something similar on these real estate investment trusts.
I don't know if Croatia has an agreement with the United States, but I have 6% of European companies. So, for me, it's not very interesting at the moment.
但是,如果你免缴美国税,你可能会现在就开始关注它,不是在REITs收益率为3%的时候,而是现在它开始变得有意思的时候。
But, if you are exempt from US taxes, you might start looking at it now, not when REITs are yielding 3%, but now that it's starting to get interesting.
打造一个金融中心,并准备在价格变得更便宜时扩大它。然后当利率下降并趋于稳定、情况好转时——谁知道要等到什么时候——靠时间积累耐心、抵御通胀,诸如此类。
Building a financial center, and being prepared to expand it if the price becomes cheaper. Then when interest rates come down and stabilize, and things get better, who knows when, patience over time, protection from inflation, and things like that.
这个频道对 $O 的历次判断
Value Investing with Sven Carlin, Ph.D. 在这只股票上只有这一条判断。