持有Reddit;下跌后估值合理,但由于登录用户同比增长仅7%且缺乏透明度,不建议加仓。
逐段跳播
我相信你在Mata Libre、Amazon上投资相当重,但也在Reddit和其他一些股票上投资。
and I believe you're pretty heavily invested in Mata Libre, Amazon, but but also Reddit and some other names, too.
我们是在Amazon和Reddit刚公布财报时录制的。
we record this when basically Amazon and also Reddit just reported earnings
是的,我认为今天财报之后可能还会再涨几个百分点,但仍然如此。你知道,另一家刚公布财报且波动很大的公司是Reddit。它是我们少数几家在觉得股价涨得太多时实际获利了结的公司之一。
我得说,我们的时机相当好。你最初以大约每股85美元的价格推荐了这只股票。如果不是因为我,我得承认,你可能会让它成为当时投资组合中超过2%的更大仓位。如今,它的仓位要大得多。不幸的是,我从来不是用户,所以我需要更多时间来相信这个投资案例。
长话短说,我们买入股票4个月后,它已经上涨了140%,我们决定在那个价格上获利了结。
Yeah, I think there might be a couple more percentages after today's earnings, but still. And you know, another company that just reported earnings and it's quite volatile is Reddit. It's one of the few companies where we actually took some profits when we felt like the stock had risen too much. And I got to say, our timing there has been quite good. You initially pitched the stock at about $85 per share. And if it wasn't for me, I got to take that one. You probably would have made it a larger position than just 2% of the portfolio at the time. Nowadays, it is a much larger position. Unfortunately, I was never a user, so I just needed a bit more time to be convinced by the investment case. Long story short, 4 months after we bought the stock, it was up already 140% and we decided to take some profits off the table at that price.
>> 我对此只对你有一点不满,Daniel,我们没在那只股票上赚更多钱。但是,不,我开玩笑的。如你所说,我认为减持仓位是个好决定,因为股价后来跌了不少,我们利用这个机会实际上买回了更多。
所以,我们目前实现了约140%的已实现收益,以及在我们减持后买回的股票上约60%的未实现收益。所以,这是一次疯狂的过山车之旅,但到目前为止一切顺利。我很矛盾,因为我们一直在谈论让赢家奔跑,但当估值变得极端时,我也不羞于落袋为安。而且我也考虑了公司的质量,对吧?
>> I only hold it against you a little bit there, Daniel, that we didn't make more money on that one. But, uh, no, I'm I'm kidding. As you said, I think trimming the position was a good call because the stock came down quite a lot, which we used as an opportunity to actually then buy back more. So, we currently are sitting on a realized gain of about 140% and an unrealized gain of about 60% on the shares that we bought back after we had trimmed the position. So, it's been one heck of a roller coaster ride, but so far so good. And I'm conflicted because we've been talking about letting our winners run, but when valuations get extreme, I also don't have any shame in taking some chips off the table. And I also factor in the quality of the company too, right?
对Reddit不会有同样的信心,即使它仍然是一项好业务。所以问题是,市场并不喜欢他们的第二季度财报。虽然很多数字都很惊人,但他们应用和网站的登录访客数量同比仅增长了7%,对于一家收入增长60%的公司来说,这不算多。
所以,收入表现这么好很棒,因为他们更有效地通过广告变现用户群,并且每位用户赚得更多,但这不可能永远持续。对于一家市盈率为40倍的公司,拜托。你必须做得比7%的登录用户增长更好,因为最终这才是支撑他们未来盈利能力的根本。
有多少人持续使用这个平台,所以我不想一开始就过于悲观。但我看到这个数据相当失望。而且他们没有坦诚地与投资者讨论这个问题,而是选择隐瞒。对吧?管理层没有承认这一点,他们现在决定今后停止报告登录用户指标。
所以就在我认为非常重要的这个指标可能对他们不利的时候,他们却在掩盖事实。不幸的是,我们看到Netflix也做过几次类似的事情。所以这就是为什么我可能比一个月前更愿意在Reddit上获利了结。
Wouldn't have the same confidence in Reddit, even if it is still a good business. And so the thing is, the market did not love their Q2 earnings. And while a lot of the numbers were phenomenal, the number of loggedin visitors to their app and website only grew 7% year-over-year, which is not a lot for a company that is growing revenue by 60%. So, it's great that revenue is doing so well because they're more effectively monetizing their user base with ads and earning more per user, but that is not sustainable for forever. And for a company trading at 40 times earnings, come on. And you got to do you got to do better than 7% growth in logged in users because ultimately that is what underpins their earnings power going forward. How many people are using the platform on a consistent basis and so I don't want to be too pessimistic right off the the get-go here. But I I was pretty disappointed to see that. And rather than speak candidly about the issue with investors, they opted to just hide it. Right? management didn't acknowledge this point and they uh are now deciding to stop reporting logged in user metrics going forward. So right as this metric that I think is very important might be turning against them. They're offiscating things. Unfortunately, we've seen Netflix do something similar a few times. And so that's why I'm probably more open to taking gains with Reddit than I would have been even just a month ago.
但我们本应讨论为什么Reddit表现这么好。我觉得我们想从这些仓位中学到所有教训。而且我认为实际上这次我们刚得到的财报,我的意思是,我们应该说财报刚出来,我们现在正在录制。我认为这是一个重要的教训,因为它也表明,你可以有规则说你不卖赢家。
但股票是不同的。公司是不同的。你可以对Google这样做,因为Google是一家更成熟的企业。它更加多元化。事情不会变化得那么快。但对于Reddit,如果你的股票在仅仅几个月内上涨了150%,而且你知道公司和股票波动性更大,那么不采取与对待Google相同的方式是有道理的。而且,我觉得这次财报已经证明了这一点。
But we're supposed to be talking about why Reddit has worked out so well. I feel like we want to have all the lessons that we can learn from these positions. And I think actually this earnings that we just got, I mean, we should say earnings just came out and now we're recording this. Um, I think it's an important lesson because it also shows you, well, you could have the rule that you just don't sell your winners. But stocks are different. Companies are different. You can do that for Google because Google is a much more mature business. It's way more diversified. Things will not change as quickly. For Reddit though, if your stock is up 150% after just a couple of months and you know the company and the stock are way more volatile, it just makes sense to not act the same way as if you would on Google. And again, I feel like this earnings report has shown that.
再说一次,相当有趣的是,如果你现在上Finred或只是上网,很多人非常喜欢Reddit的财报,我几乎看不到任何负面的东西,这印证了你的观点,即管理层没有谈论一些非常重要的事实,因为你立即给我发消息,我联系了你,我们说,用户怎么了?
为什么他们这么弱?还有,锁定用户发生了什么?这是最重要的点之一。你希望Reddit生态系统里有更多人,因为我们知道AI概览等等对用户行为有相当显著的影响,我认为指出这些事情很重要。
我还要说,我仍然相当看好这家公司。如果你只看盈利数字和收入增长,尽管用户增长不快,这表明这个平台实际上被低估了多少。而且我认为他们有很大的空间在仍然有3亿用户的用户群上继续增长,对吧?
Again, what's quite interesting is that if you now go on Finred or just online, a lot of people like the earnings of Reddit quite a lot and I barely see anything negative about it, which goes to your point that management is not talking about some of the very important facts because you immediately messaged me and I reached out to you and we said, well, what's going on with users? Why are they so weak? And also, what's happening to the the locked in users? Which is one of the most important points. you want more people inside the Reddit ecosystem because we know that AI overviews and all of that have a quite significant impact on the user behavior and I think it's important to to point those things out. I would also say that I'm still quite bullish on the company. If you just look at the earnings numbers and the revenue growth despite users not growing that fast, it shows you how undermonetized this platform actually is. And I think they have a whole lot of room to keep growing that on a user base that's still 300 million people, right?
所以我想说,我们不要太过超前,让我们先谈谈即使在这份财报之后,你如何看待这家企业的质量。还有什么?我们为什么投资?为什么它表现得这么好?——嗯,我们刚刚谈到谷歌和亚马逊可能是历史上最优秀的两家企业。
所以我们不需要重复这些,但这对Reddit来说很难跟上。另一方面,Reddit实际上在很长一段时间里被视为Snapchat 2.0,这算是一个贬义词。是的,我说这话是因为Snapchat在我们播客中获得了我们覆盖过的所有公司中最差的评级。
所以我们完全理解这个比较的分量。但当时的看法是,它看起来像一个拥有大量用户但无法真正变现的社交媒体平台。Reddit和Facebook差不多同时出现。在很长一段时间里,Reddit没有产生任何收入。
直到最近七八年,他们才开始产生大量收入。所以对比这两者很有趣,我认为部分原因是Reddit的特殊之处在于用户是匿名的,这意味着他们拥有的关于你的数据比Facebook少得多。因此直觉上你会认为通过广告变现更难,因为你不如在Facebook或Instagram上那样了解用户,但在某些情况下这并不重要。
如果你有兴趣研究装修房子时最好的电钻,然后你上Reddit去研究,那么Reddit只需要知道这些,因为他们就可以在你浏览DIY子版块的对话时为你展示最好的电钻广告。这听起来很简单,而且有很多公司花了很长时间才真正找到自己的商业模式。
但你刚才说的他们花了这么长时间,这最初并没有让我怀疑这家企业,因为它成立于2005年,直到最近才盈利。所以有很长一段时间他们就是无法让商业模式运转起来。不过我想说,部分原因是两位创始人很早就把公司卖给了一家对Reddit根本不关心的媒体集团,创始人直到2015年才回来。
所以你可以说这家公司真正运营这种模式只有10年。然后他们花了很多时间来重建基础设施,为Reddit上的所有人提供最佳用户体验。只有在那之后,他们才能真正开始思考如何让广告发挥作用?
如何变现整个平台?我想说从那以后,它就像野草一样疯长。而且它利润很高。在我的推介中,我估计Reddit可能在本十年末达到30%的营业利润率。我当时认为这是一个相当雄心勃勃的目标。
然而,他们在去年年底就做到了。所以我大大低估了他们能取得的成就。这只是又一个例证,说明财务模型只是投资过程的一部分。你真的必须更定性地相信企业的质量。而正是在这一点上,我不完全确定利润率会走向何方,他们肯定超出了我的预期,但我确实知道他们可能有很大的增长空间,优秀的企业会给你带来惊喜。
这就是我们在本期节目以及基本上整个去年所发现的。
So I would say let's not get too far ahead of ourselves here and let's actually start with how you think about the quality of the business even after this earnings report. What's still there? Why are we invested? Why did it work out so well? >> Well, we just talked about Google and Amazon being perhaps two of the best businesses to ever exist. So we don't need to repeat all that, but that's pretty hard for Reddit to to follow up. Reddit, I would say, on the other hand, was actually for a long time seen as being a Snapchat 2.0. know, which is sort of a dirty word. And yeah, I say that after Snapchat received basically the worst rating from us of any company we've ever covered on this podcast. So, we definitely understand the weight of that comparison. But the idea was that it looked like a social media platform with a lot of users, but no real way to monetize them. Reddit came out around the same time as Facebook. For a long, long time, Reddit didn't generate any money. really not until just the last like seven or eight years did they start generating significant amounts of revenue. So it's interesting to contrast the two and I think in part this is because of what does make Reddit special which is that users are synonymous and so that means they have much less data on you than Facebook would. And so intuitively that would make you think it's much harder to monetize via advertising because you don't know the users as well as on Facebook or Instagram, but that also doesn't really matter in some cases. If you're interested in researching the best drill to use and renovating your house and you go on to Reddit to research that, then that's really all Reddit needs to know because then they can serve you an ad for the best drills to use while you maybe peruse conversations about home rens in a DIY subreddit. It sounds pretty straightforward and there are a lot of companies that took a lot of time until they actually figured out their business model. But what you just said about, you know, them taking such a long time wasn't part what made me doubt the business at first because it was founded in 2005. It wasn't profitable until very recently. So there was a long time where they just couldn't make the business model work. I would say though part of that is that the two founders sold the company very early on to a media conglomerate that didn't really care about Reddit at all and the founders only came back in in 2015. So you might say that the company is only really operating this model now for 10 years. And then it took a lot of time to sort of rebuild the infrastructure and deliver the best possible user experience for all the people on Reddit. And only then could they actually start thinking about how do we make advertising work? How do we monetize the entire platform? And I would say since then it's growing like a weed. And it's highly profitable. In my pitch, I estimated that Reddit might be able to hit a 30% operating margin by the end of the decade. That was what I thought was a reasonably ambitious goal. Well, instead, they did that by the end of last year. So, I way underestimated what they could achieve. And that's just another illustration of why financial models are only part of the investment process. You really have to be confident in the quality of the business more qualitatively. And that was where I felt of didn't exactly know where margins would go and they certainly exceeded my expectations, but I did know that they probably had a lot of room to grow and great businesses surprise you to the upside. That's what we figured out this episode and basically over the entire last year.
嗯,没错。但Reddit的结果范围要广得多。讽刺的是,谷歌是原因之一。所以,Reddit确实存在对谷歌的依赖风险。你在每次Reddit财报电话会议上都会听到这个。分析师们喜欢问这个问题,这是因为他们很多流量确实来自谷歌搜索。
所以,超过一半的每日Reddit用户通过谷歌搜索访问该网站。他们从谷歌搜索开始,搜索一些东西,比如城里最好的布朗尼蛋糕,然后他们找到一个当地的子版块或者其他什么给他们推荐的地方。
但他们不一定登录应用,也不一定有账户。这就是为什么我们之前谈到登录用户的重要性,那些有账户并经常回来的人,与那些只是谷歌搜索了一下的人相比。谷歌建议他们查看一个Reddit帖子,然后他们就这样来到了Reddit。
所以,关于LLM将如何改变传统谷歌搜索模式、人们的问题将如何得到回答的整个争论,从根本上说都与Reddit非常非常相关。所以也许有些听众听到这个会感到惊讶,但Reddit确实是互联网上从真人那里获得答案的最佳地方之一。
而谷歌当然致力于为搜索查询的人提供最佳答案。所以他们之间有一种自然的关系,而且这种关系时起时落。我确实花了一段时间才真正相信Reddit对互联网的影响,现在也对LLM产生了影响。
>> Well, that's right. And Reddit comes though with a much wider range of possible outcomes. And ironically, Google is part of the reason for that. So, Reddit does have some dependency risk on Google. You hear about it on every Reddit earnings call. The analysts love to ask about it and it's because a lot of their traffic does come from Google search. So, a bit more than half of daily Reddit users visit the website via Google search. So, they start on Google search, they search something, the best uh brownies in town, and then they go and find a local subreddit or whatever it is that gives them recommendations. And they're not necessarily logged into the app, though. They don't necessarily have accounts. So, that's why we were talking before about the importance of logged in users, people who have accounts and are recurringly coming back versus people who just Googled something. Google suggested a Reddit thread for them to check out and then that's how they ended up on Reddit. So really the entire debate of how LLMs will change the legacy Google search model, how people will have their queries answered, that's all fundamentally very very relevant to Reddit. And so maybe some listeners are surprised to hear that, but Reddit is truly one of the best places on the internet to get answers from real people. and Google is of course in the business of delivering the best answers to people who are searching for queries. So there's a natural relationship between them and it kind of es and flows. It certainly took me time to actually believe just the impact that Reddit has on the internet basically now also on on LLMs.
我想这应该是我们普遍要提到的,因为话题的焦点和子版块的搜索驱动性质。日活跃用户和月活跃用户当然在结构上低于Instagram或TikTok等应用,对吧?我认为Reddit的数字大约是9%,也就是说每月登录一次的人中有9%实际上每天登录。
而TikTok的这个数字大约是35%,Instagram大约是50%。所以明显更高。而且使用应用的用户显然登录频率也高得多。因此,根据公司的说法,他们的价值大约是未登录用户的三倍。
所以推动更多人下载应用并将其作为入口是Reddit未来的重大任务之一。再说一次,为什么股价对今天的消息反应如此负面?嗯,因为这正是我们没有看到的。你可以从这些只偶尔使用Reddit的用户身上赚到很多钱,但这只能持续一段时间。
所以最终,你需要人们真正使用应用。我个人可以说我从不这样做。即使现在我更频繁地使用Reddit,也总是通过谷歌。而且大多数时候,如果我看到一个AI概览,我不会点击Reddit,因为我觉得如果我有更多问题,我会让Gemini详细说明发生了什么。
所以只有通过让更多人使用应用,你才能消除对谷歌的依赖,并提高RPU,即每用户平均收入,这是所有这些公司都想做的。
I guess this is something that we should generally mention because of the topic focus and the searchdriven nature of subreddits. The daily active users and also the monthly active users are structurally lower of course than for apps like Instagram or Tik Tok, right? I think the numbers are about 9% for Reddit, meaning 9% of people who log in once a month actually log in daily. And that number is about 35% for Tik Tok and it's about 50% for Instagram. So significantly higher. And users who use the app obviously log in much more frequently too. So they're also worth according to the company roughly three times more than locked out users. So driving more people to download the app and use that as an entry is one of the big tasks for Reddit in the future. And again like why is the stock reacting so negatively to the news today? Well because this is exactly what we're not seeing. And you can get a lot of money out of these users that only use Reddit, you know, once in a lifetime, but it can only go on for so long. So, in the end, you need people actually using the app. And I personally can say I never do that. Even now that I'm using Reddit more often, it's always through Google. And most of the time, if I just see an AI overview, I don't click on Reddit because I feel like if I have more questions, I will just answer Gemini to, you know, elaborate on on what's going on. So only by getting more people on the app, that's how you eliminate the Google dependency and also improve the RPU, the average revenue per user, which all of these companies want to do.
现在你明白为什么我在本节开头抱怨 Reddit 的登录用户了。另外,Reddit 刚刚宣布或至少正在讨论的另一件事,为了减少依赖,是不续签与 Google 的数据许可协议,因为 Google 目前每年向 Reddit 支付 6000 万美元,以使用其数据用于其 LLM 结果。
大约一年前你向我推荐 Reddit 时,我就已经觉得这个价格低得惊人。我认为他们应该获得这个价格的数倍,对于他们这种规模的公司来说,这将是一大笔钱。所以,我实际上很高兴他们在这里打出了正确的牌。
但我还得说,在这次财报电话会议上,你没有得到任何关于我们何时能真正看到这些许可协议带来收入的更新,或者未来是否会发生。而现在,像 Alphabet 这样的公司尤其开始从 AI 和 LLM 中赚钱,我认为他们愿意为优质数据支付的价格会上升。
所以,是的,你可能会说 Reddit 过去 20 年的人类互动语料库。实际上,就在昨晚,我还在读一个 16 年前的 Reddit 帖子,今天对我来说仍然相关且有趣。所以这就是 Reddit 的酷之处。
而且,那个协议是在 2024 年签署的。当时,没有人知道 Google 的 AI 概览会如何影响网络流量,对吧?有可能它们的转化率与经典 Google 搜索相似,但现在两年过去了,Google 有 10 亿 Gemini 用户,原始来源的点击率下降了大约 60%,因为用户可以在 AI 概览中找到他们想要的确切答案,正如你提到的,Daniel,而不是去底层网站获取更多信息,他们只是向 AI 提出后续问题,得到量身定制的答案。
所以,Google 几乎在某种程度上从网站吸走流量,可能在某些方面蚕食自己,然后把人们引向 Gemini 聊天。
>> And now you see why I was ranting about Reddit's logged in users at the start of this segment. Well, another thing that Reddit has just announced or at least debated in order to reduce the dependency is not to renew their data licensing deal with Google because Google currently pays Reddit $60 million a year to use their data for their LLM results. And I already found that shockingly low back when you pitch Reddit to me about a year ago. And I think they should get multiples of that, which for a company of their size would be a whole lot of money. So, I'm actually glad that they play their cards right here. But I got to say too on this earnings call, you didn't get any update on when we can actually consider money coming in through those licensing deals or if that will even happen in the future. And now that companies like Alphabet in particular are starting to make money from AI and LLMs, I would think that the price that they're willing to pay for good data would increase. So yeah, you could probably argue that Reddit's corpus of human interaction from over the last 20 years. Actually, just last night, I was reading through a Reddit thread from 16 years ago that was still relevant and interesting to me today. So that that's the cool thing about Reddit. And uh yeah, that deal was signed in 2024. And back then, nobody knew how AI overviews on Google would affect web traffic, right? It could have been that they convert at similar rates to a classic Google search, but now two years in, Google has a billion Gemini users and clickthrough rates for original sources plunged by roughly 60% because users can find exactly what they're looking for answered in the AI overview, as you kind of alluded to, Daniel, and instead of going to the underlying website for additional information, they just do a follow-up question to the AI and get a customtailored answer. So, Google is almost in a way siphoning traffic from websites and kind of maybe cannibalizing itself in some way and then funneling people into Gemini chats.
所以现在焦点有点转移到像 Reddit 这样的公司,说 Google 不受影响,但也许你会受到影响。
So now the focus is sort of shifting to companies like Reddit and saying well Google is not affected but maybe you are.
但我认为我们现在已经过了那个点,即使 Reddit 负责 LLM 大约 5% 到 10% 的原始训练数据,以及 AI 驱动的答案引擎中高达 40% 的实时搜索引用。所以没有这些数据,你可能会说 LLM 会有问题,但即使如此,鉴于我们今天所处的位置,我不认为即使 Reddit 说我不再授权我的数据,那些 LLM 实际上会有问题。
But I think we are past that point now where you know even though Reddit is responsible for about 5 to 10% of the raw training data for LLMs and as much as 40% of real time search citations in AIdriven answer engines. So without that data you could probably say that LLM would have a problem and still because of where we are today I don't think even if Reddit says I'm not licensing my data anymore those LLMs would actually have a problem.
我认为我们刚刚过了那个点,你能希望的最好的事情是他们能获得一个比仅仅得到 6000 万美元好得多的协议。所以再说一次,你是 Reddit 的专家。你怎么说?在今天的价格下,尤其是在财报后下跌了大约 20% 之后,它还是买入吗,还是我们应该考虑卖出我们的一部分股份?
I think we're just past that point and the best thing you can hope for is that they get a significantly better deal than just getting $60 million. So again, you're the expert on Reddit. What do you say? Is it still a buy at today's prices, especially after it has come down about 20% after earnings, or should we actually consider the selling part of our stake?
我很乐意暂时持有它。Reddit 增长如此之快,以至于估值看起来比我们第一次获利了结时以及我第一次看它时合理得多。所以,我绝对不会说我们需要卖出。
I'm happy to sit on it for the moment. Reddit has grown so fast that actually the valuation looks a whole lot more reasonable than it did when we first took some profits in the position and when I first looked at it. So, I definitely wouldn't say that we need to sell.
我仍然相信 Reddit 的增长前景及其作为一个平台的价值,在一个日益被 AI 内容主导的世界里,因为我认为很多人不想只是与 Gemini 在 AI 概览中来回对话。他们想和真人交谈。
他们想听到来自真实用户的见解,这些用户使用过产品或分享过类似的生活经历。而这正是 Reddit 擅长的。
I still believe in Reddit's growth prospects and its value as a platform in a world that's increasingly dominated by AI content because I think a lot of people don't want to just have conversations back and forth with Gemini in an AI overview. They want to talk to real people. They want to hear insights from real people who have used products or shared similar life experiences. And then that is what Reddit is great for.
Reddit 的首席执行官 Steve Huffman 在最新的财报电话会议上说了一些我觉得有趣的话,但那就是很多人需要一些时间才能理解 Reddit。我认为你就是一个例子,Daniel,但一旦他们理解了,他们就理解了。
所以你可能需要去 Reddit 几次,登录,尝试不同的东西。可能需要一段时间。希望有一天它会豁然开朗。你会看到是什么让这个平台如此特别。
And Steve Huffman, the CEO of Reddit, said something on the the latest earnings call that I thought was interesting, but it's that it takes a lot of people some time to get Reddit. I think you're an example of this, Daniel, but once they get it, they get it. So you might have to go to Reddit a few times, log in, try different things. It might take you a while. Uh hopefully one day it clicks. You see what makes the platform so special.
但无论如何,在最近那次财报电话会议之后,我绝对不会急于买入更多股票。实际上,如果有人想看到一位股票研究分析师严厉批评一个管理团队,去听 Reddit 2026 年第二季度的财报电话会议,跳到 31 分 30 秒处。
But anyways, I'm definitely not falling over myself to buy more shares after that last earnings call. Actually, if anyone wants to see an equity research analyst absolutely lay into a management team, go listen to Reddit's Q2 2026 earnings call and jump to the 31 minute and 30 second mark.
Steve,我不想赘述这一点,但你的股票大幅下跌,因为投资者有一种感觉,你有一个——我不想说得太直白——用户问题,尤其是在美国,用户只是略有下降,但他们在下降,尽管你在过去一年里做了所有投资。
我当然听到你说每周都在改善,但人们看着每日数据说,你知道,未登录的流量将面临压力,因为随着搜索转向 AI,你不会得到推荐,而且让人们从未登录转为登录会更难。这就是你所看到的症状。
所以你回购了很多股票。你似乎并不担心,或者你和 Jen 似乎非常自信。你、Jen、Andrew,似乎都非常自信。我想知道是什么给了你这么大的信心,让你相信你会增长到,你知道,美国 1 亿登录用户和全球 10 亿,而本季度只是略有下降,因为显然存在很大的脱节,这显然影响了你的股票。
Steve, um I don't want to belabor this point, but your stocking is down sharply because there is just a sense from investors that you have a I don't want it to be blunt, a user problem, especially in the US that users are, you know, it's only a slight kick down, but they're ticked down despite all of the investments you've made over the last year. And I certainly hear you on the weekly improvement, but people are looking at the daily and saying, you know, the logged out traffic is going to be under pressure because as search shifts to AI, you're not going to get referrals and that it's going to be harder to get people to go from logged out to logged in. And that's sort of symptomatic of what you're seeing. And so you're buying back a lot of stock. You don't seem concerned or you and Jen seem very confident. You, Jen, Andrew, all seem very confident. I guess what gives you so much confidence that you're going to grow to, you know, a 100red million logged in users in the US and one billion globally versus the slight kick down this quarter because there's obviously a big disconnect and it's obviously impacting your stock.
然后只是第二部分,跟进 Ron 的问题,你看到明年有任何世界你不向 Google 和 OpenAI 授权数据吗?
And then just the second piece of that to follow up on Ron's question, do you see any world where you're not licensing data to Google and OpenAI next year?
好的。谢谢 Rich。那么让我先回答最后的问题。我们很自信,因为我们的产品工作正在奏效。Reddit 是社区和对话。社区是普遍的,所以我们认为我们在美国有适合每个人的内容,问题在于揭示这一点,我们正在朝着这个目标取得进展。
在一个季度内显著提高应用内新用户留存率,这是我们非常自豪的事情,这种留存率的提高推动了增长,这是我们控制范围内的工作。是的,搜索是外部的,外部搜索波动很大,尤其是未登录的网络,但这不是我们业务所在,我们会确保我们尽可能从那个流量中获取价值,所以我们一直在推动从网络到应用的转化,这也变得更加有效。
所以长期来看,我们一如既往地自信,我们会达到我们设定的那些里程碑。但这项工作确实需要时间,我们在产品上确实有很多工作要做。但推动这种直接增长在我们的控制范围内,我们正在看到一些进展。
Uh, okay. Um thanks Rich. So look let me start with the end first. We are confident because our product work is working. Uh Reddit is communities and conversation. Communities are universal and so we think we have in the US content for everyone and it's a matter of revealing that and we're making progress towards that end. moving new user retention in the app um this significantly in a quarter is uh something that we're very proud of and that sort of improvement in retention drives growth and that is work that we're in control of. Yes, search is external search is volatile particularly logged out web but that's not where our business lives and we will make sure that we uh get as much value from that traffic as we can and so that's where we've been driving conversions from web to app and that's become more effective as well. So long term we are as confident as ever that we're going to get to those milestones that we've set. Um but the work does take time and we do have a lot of work to do in the product. Um but driving that direct growth is in our control and we're seeing some progress.
像 Hermittly 和 Reddit 这样的公司确实向你展示,你真的必须理解一家企业的盈利能力。
Companies like Hermittly and Reddit do show you that you really have to understand the earnings power of a business.
所以如果我不想拥有 Remitly,Kyle 也不想,那么理论上我们仍然可以把它加入内在价值投资组合,只要你在其中有重要股份,Daniel。所以如果我们三个人没有共识,它不会是一个完整的仓位,但它可以是一个 1% 或 2% 的跟踪仓位,就像我们处理 Reddit 那样,在我不明智地不想立即把它做成完整仓位之后,因为再次,我缺乏你所看到的远见。
And so if I don't want to own remittly and and Kyle doesn't either, then we can theoretically still add it to the intrinsic value portfolio as long as you have a meaningful stake in it, Daniel. And so it wouldn't be a full position if we don't have consensus among the three of us, but it could be a one or 2% tracking position as we handled it with Reddit after I unwisely didn't want to make it a full position immediately because again I lacked the vision that you saw.
他说在等什么
这个频道对 $RDDT 的历次判断
The Intrinsic Value Podcast 在这只股票上只有这一条判断。