The Intrinsic Value Podcast 对 $DUOL 的判断变化
也许我们直接进入下一家公司,我称之为一个赌注,自推荐以来表现也相当不错。嗯,Duolingo。>> 我认为Duolingo,我不知道,我认为风险方面非常相似。很多人,我不明白,也许你们在聊天里给我你的看法。
也有人说你现在可以用AI或类似CHP来学习语言,我不这么看。比如如果你用过一次Duolingo,然后你把它和CHP比较,那完全是两回事。
Maybe we just go ahead with the next company that's I would say a bet that has also performed quite well since the pitch. Um Dualingo. >> I think Dolingu has I don't know I think it's pretty similar in terms of the risks um a lot of people what I don't get maybe give me your opinion on that in the chat also people say that you can just learn languages with AI or like CHP generally now I don't see that um like if you use Dualingo once and then you compare that to CHP it's a totally different thing
语言学习是那种你心里想‘我想学西班牙语’,但真正每天去做,或者至少每周三四次,太难了。你只有在至少有点乐趣的情况下才会去做。然后如果你去JPD,基本上让它给你一个学西班牙语的计划,那体验很糟糕。我认为那完全不是个好体验。
like language learning is one of those things where you you have in your mind hey I want to learn Spanish right but then to actually get to it every single day or at least I don't know three or four times a week it's so tough and it. You only do it if it's at least a bit of fun. Then if you go to JPD and basically ask it to have, I don't know, a plan for learning Spanish, it just sucks. I think it's not a great experience at all.
嗯,所以如果你问我,我们上次讨论了分发。AI在语言学习领域的分发。嗯,我认为Duolingo有巨大优势。我不太喜欢的是他们现在进入数学、国际象棋之类的领域。我认为在那方面其他平台有优势。
Um, so if you ask me, we talked about distribution last time. Distribution of AI in the language learning space. Um, I think Dualingo has a huge advantage. What I don't like so much is the fact that they now go into like math and chess and all that stuff. I think there you have other platforms that have an advantage.
所以我认为它擅长语言学习。我不认为它是那种巨大的……我的意思是,叙事基本上是说你有这个学习平台,会扩展到很多不同的垂直领域。我不相信会是这样,至少不会那么成功。
So I think it's good at learning languages. I don't think it's uh this huge I mean I think the the narrative is basically that you have this learning platform that will expand into so many different verticals. I don't believe that will be the case at least not that successful.
>> 是的,我的意思是,我不认为它能排在Adobe之上。那会有点疯狂。所以,我们要么把Adobe往上移,要么Duolingo可能进入D到E的范围。
>> Yeah I mean I I don't think it can rank above Adobe. That would be that would be sort of insane. So, we either need to move Adobe up or um Dolingo maybe goes in like the D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D to E range.
我断断续续用Duolingo很久了,超过十年。嗯,有一段时间我付费了。我认为你说得对。不是没人去ChatGPT学语言。嗯,我也不确定有人能通过vibe coding做出一个语言学习应用,能接近Duolingo的体验,对吧?
I have used uh you know I've used Dualingo on and off for a long long time, well over a decade. Um and at one point I was paying for it. I think you're right. It's not that no one is going on to chat GBT to learn a language. uh and I'm not sure that somebody can um vibe code a language learning app that is going to be uh you know anywhere like the experience of of Duolingo, right?
显然,他们是游戏化语言学习的大师。嗯,关于你是否真的能通过Duolingo学会一门语言,这有点说法。我不认为我认识谁真正把他们的语言流利度归功于Duolingo。
Obviously that is uh you know they're they're sort of the master of gamified language learning. Uh there's something to be said of the fact of can you actually learn a language through Dolingo? I don't think I know anybody who like meaningfully attributes their their uh fluency in a lang in a language [clears throat] to to Duallingingo.
我认识很多人用过Duolingo,然后基本上就倦怠了,他们感到很大压力。连续打卡非常有效。
It's I know a lot of people who did Dolingo and then uh basically burned out on it [laughter] and they felt a lot of pressure. The streaks are very effective.
嗯,如果我要长期看空语言学习行业,我唯一要说的就是,嗯,你知道,有了AI,你可以这样框架化。嗯,翻译工具可能会变得非常好,以至于到了某个点,人们就不太愿意花功夫去学语言了。
Um, if I were to be bearish on, you know, let's call it the language learning industry, um, long term, the only thing I would say is that, um, you know, with AI, uh, you could could frame it that way. um translation tools might become so good that it gets to a point where um you it just becomes uh people are less inclined to to do the work to learn a language.
嗯,但语言翻译似乎是一个极其可解的问题。嗯,然后你会失去很多像我这样的随意语言学习者。你知道,我有点觉得,是的,我可以花些时间学西班牙语,但如果我要去哥伦比亚,嗯,大多数人可能会……
我不知道,相当多的人会说英语。嗯,然后我可以用翻译工具应付过去。
Uh, but language translation seems like an incredibly solvable problem. Uh, and then you lose a lot of the casual language learners like myself, you know, I kind of feel like, yeah, you know, I could spend some time learning Spanish, unless but like if I'm going to Colombia, um, most people are probably going to I don't a good a decent number of people are going to be able to speak English. Uh, and then I can get by with translation tools.
>> 但那实际上,抱歉,那是我的反驳论点。我知道我们在播客节目里有过同样的争论,但我想,如果你今天只是想和人交流,大多数人至少会说足够的英语,让你能大致表达你想做什么。人们仍然想学语言。
实际上,想学语言的人比以往任何时候都多。所以,我觉得有点……我在浪漫化它。我很清楚这一点。但去另一个国家,尝试用他们的语言与人交流,这有点说法。嗯,我觉得就是有点东西。
>> But that's actually, sorry, but that's my counter argument. I I know we had the same argument in our podcast episode, but I'm like, if you just want to, you know, communicate to people today, like most people speak at least enough English so that you can sort of communicate what you want to do. People still want to learn languages. Actually, more people want to learn language than ever before. So, I feel like there's somewhat of a I'm romanticizing it. I'm I'm well aware of that. But there's something to say about, you know, going to another country and trying to commun communicate with people in their own language. Um, I think there's just something about it.
我也知道这有点不一致,因为我看到自己在争论,‘好吧,但有多少人呢?’比如,是否还有10%的人真的会那样做?我认为在我们的……嗯,我想是Meta或谷歌的研究,我想是谷歌。嗯,我们讨论了他们的新眼镜。
嗯,那是完全不同的事情。我认为我们都认为智能手机将是未来的主导硬件。但我确实相信,如你所说,你会戴上这些谷歌或Meta眼镜,它们实时翻译对方说的话。
I I also know it's inconsistent because I see myself arguing saying, "Okay, well, but how many people are there?" Like, is it 10% of people who would still actually do that? And I think in our um I think it was Meta or Google research, I think it was Google. Um we discussed their new glasses. Um and that's a whole different thing. I think we all think that, you know, smartphones will be the dominate um or dominating hardware in the future. But I do believe that as you said like you would just have these Google or meta glasses on and they in real time translate what the other person is saying.
嗯,所以当涉及到这一点,可能只是时间问题,不会再有那么多人学语言了。嗯,至少与今天相比可能如此。嗯,所以我同意。嗯,而且正如这个评论提到的,这也是我在研究中发现的。很难找到Duolingo的真正护城河。
基本上归结为执行,你知道,大多数人想到学语言时就会想到Duolingo,所以我去哪?Duolingo。然后他们在游戏化方面有很好的体验,但我不确定,如你所说,可能长期来看,这是我的长期论点,学语言的人会减少,但那些学的人会更认真,然后你不得不质疑那些人真的会去Duolingo吗?我认为答案是否定的。
Um so when it comes to that and it's probably just a matter of time there won't be that many people still learning languages. Um probably at least if you compare that to today. Um so I would agree. Um and also as you know this comment is mentioning and that's what I found in my research. It's very hard to find a real mode with Dolingo. Like it basically comes down to execution and saying you know most people think of Dualingo when they think about I want to learn a language so where do I go dualingo then they have a great you know experience in terms of gamifying it but I don't know as you said like probably over the long term and that's like my long-term thesis we will have fewer people who learn languages but the people who do are more serious about it and then you have to question would those people actually go to Dualingo and I think you know the answer is no
嗯 >> 把Duolingo放在D,想着也许他们真的会扩展到其他垂直领域。嗯,
Um >> and put Dualingo and D like thinking okay maybe they actually expand into other verticals. Um,
>> 我能说当你移动它时,眼睛变黑,这变得多么不祥吗?[笑声] >> 我喜欢我们有几个这样的,因为它对我们把它做成D不满意。>> 你也从白色变成黑色。所以如果你移除背景,有时你必须这样做,它就变成那样 >> 但那是眼睛。是Duolingo猫头鹰的眼睛。
>> can I just say how ominous it becomes when you move the back the eyes turn black when you move it over? [laughter] >> I like we have that with a couple of these because is not happy with us for making it >> D. You also turn from white to black. So if you remove the background which sometimes you have to do it turns into that >> but it's the eyes. It's the eyes with the Dolingo owl.
>> 是的,没错。更吓人了。好问题。Duolingo在德国有多受欢迎?嗯,如果你想学一门语言,你会去Duolingo。嗯,我想它可能和美国一样受欢迎。
>> Yeah, that's true. It's even more scary. Like good question. How popular is Dolingo in Germany? Um, if you want to learn learn a language, you go to Dualingo. Um, I would say it's probably as um as popular as it is in the US, I would say.
嗯,Duolingo怎么不是EOF?老实说,各位,可能在看完所有公司之后,某个时候我们必须调整。就像我们刚才把Adobe往上推一样,也许我们必须把Duolingo调整到比D更低。嗯,我认为那很公平。
Um, how is Dolingo not EOF? To be completely honest, guys, probably after going through all of the companies, at some point we have to adjust. Like just as we pushed up to Doby um up right now, maybe we have to adjust Dual Lingo into into lower than D right now. Um, I think that's fair.
但我不知道。我的意思是,目前没有人在同一水平上与他们竞争。而且这家公司也不是只存在了两年。我想我这里有一张图表,因为股价又涨了,这基本上是在比较他们的月活跃用户和日活跃用户与公司被给予的倍数。
But I don't know. I mean, currently they don't have anyone competing with them on the same level. And it's not like the company has just you know um existed for two years even I think I have a chart here um because the stock went up again and this is basically just comparing their monthly active users and the daily active users compared to the multiple that the company has been given.
所以基本上你在这里看到的是,倍数与用户增长之间存在相对较高的相关性,当用户增长下降时,倍数也下降了。
So basically what you see here um relatively high correlation between the multiple went down when the numbers of or basically the growth of users went down as well.
现在我们已经看到,我认为股价又上涨了约 60%,这主要是因为这个小幅上升,有趣的是,用户增长略有加速,但有趣的是,人们现在预计下个季度用户增长将达到 27%,这是因为我从一个 PowerPoint 中泄露了幻灯片,其中他们基本上显示下个季度增长 27%。
显然,他们说这不是指引,但市场现在认为这就是我们下个季度将看到的情况。
Um and now we have seen I think again like a 60% um rise in the stock and this has primarily been because of this little bump right um and that's only and that's funny because user growth accelerated slightly but um and that's a funny part of the thing people now expect 27% user growth for the next quarter and that's because I leaked the slide from a PowerPoint um where they basically had 27% growth for the next quarter. Obviously they said that's not the guidance but the market is now thinking that's what we will see next quarter.
所以我认为这相当有趣,但显然这是短期的。好吧,我们得快点。比如说 Duolingo 的 D2E 价值今天比 Wix 还差,可能就是这样。
Um, so I think that's quite interesting, but obviously short-term. Um, okay, we we got to be quicker. Let's say Dualingo D2E value today it's it's worse than Wix like it can be.
有人指出远期盈利相当糟糕,这是事实。看起来 Fiscal AI 说的是 55 倍远期盈利。是的,但我认为这不是最好的衡量指标。我的意思是,这是远期价格对自由现金流。我认为对于 Duolingo 来说,这是一个更好的衡量指标。
>> Somebody Yeah, somebody pointed out that the forward earnings are uh pretty bad and and that's true. It looks like fiscal AI is saying 55 times forward earnings. >> Yeah, but I think that's not the best metric to look at. I mean, this is um forward price to free cash flow. Um I think that's a better metric to look at for Dualingo.
否则盈利看起来相当高,这是事实。但这总是取决于你使用哪个指标。以及那如何……为什么?你知道为什么吗?我的意思是,为什么 trailing 17 倍盈利是……
>> Um otherwise the earnings look quite high. That's true. Um but it's always dependent on which metric you use. Um and how that's uh that's >> why. Do you know do you know why? I mean why is the trailing 17 times earnings for
我实际上需要深入细节。我的意思是,让我们快速看看能否在这里调出来。我有一段时间没覆盖它了。让我们看看我们到底要去哪里。这显然可能是基于股票的补偿,那就会倾向于看市盈率。因为我认为基于股票的补偿相当高。
>> I would actually have to go into the details. I mean let's quickly see if we can just pull it up here. It's been a while since I covered it. Um let's see where we actually going. It could obviously be stockbased compensation which then would lean towards looking at the PE. Um because I think stockbased comp is quite high. Um,
让我们看看我们这里有没有。基于股票的补偿。你可以看到那相当高。我的意思是,如果你只是把它与净利率相比。所以,我在看估计。他们说 trailing 12 个月收入是 4.1 亿,但抱歉,净收入是 4.1 亿。
但它预计明年会下降到 1.3 亿,1.65 亿。是的,我认为他们在下降。所以,预测是他们基本上在 25 年进入今年时大幅超额盈利。
let's see if we have it here. Stockbased comp. Um, you can see that's quite high. I mean, if you just compare it to net income rate. >> So, I'm looking I'm looking at the estimates. Um, >> they're saying trailing 12-month revenue is 410 million, but or sorry, in net income is 410 million. Um, but it's supposed to fall to 130 million next year, 165 million. Uh, >> yeah, I think they >> falling. >> So, the projection is that they basically massively overearned in 25 into this year.
我认为事实并非如此。我认为更多的是他们现在大力投资。我认为他们现在想再次获得更多的用户增长。这在过去的几个季度里并没有那么快地实现。但老实说,我可能是错的。我需要更详细地再看一下,看看究竟发生了什么变化。
>> I think that's not really the case. I think it's more that they now invest heavily. Um, I think they now wanted to get a lot more user growth again. Um, which didn't end up happening that quickly in in the past quarters. But honestly, I could be wrong. I would need to look at it in more detail again um to see what exactly changed.
这是一个缺点。如果你看了这么多公司,并且你几个月前覆盖了一家公司,你就不会那么了解它的现状。但我会说,如果有什么变化,可能会改变 Duolingo 的 D2E,对吧?
That's a downside. If you look at so many companies and you covered a company like a couple of months ago um you're not that up to date in terms of in terms of how it looks. But I would say that probably if anything changes Dolingo to D2E, right?
如果有什么更贵的话,那应该相当低。我会把它定得很低。有人在评论中说 Duolingo AI 会打败我们。[笑声]
>> If anything is more expensive um than it should pretty low. I would put it pretty low. Uh, somebody somebody in the comments said that the Dolingo Al is going to beat us up. [laughter]
不,Duolingo 有一个大的一次性差距调整。你知道那是什么时候发生的吗?哦,他们可能比我们更了解这些股票。所以,如果你能告诉我们那里发生了什么,那会很有帮助。所以,那扭曲了盈利。
好的,我们在第三季度甚至得到了。好的,那说得通。是的。好的。那么 Chad,你得告诉我们 Duolingo 的价值今天 D2E 是否公平,还是我们应该在那里降低?
>> No, Dualingo had a big one time gap adjustment. Do you know when that happened? >> Oh, they they probably better informed than us just right on the spot with every of these stocks. So, um, that would be helpful if you just um could tell us what happened there. Um, so that distorts earnings. Okay, we got even in Q3. Okay, that makes sense. Yeah. Okay. So then Chad, you got to tell us um Dualingo value today D2E fair or should we should we get lower there?
所以我在看营业利润,那要稳定得多。我不确定……不确定那个巨大的调整是什么,它一定是某种税收,可能是某种税收意外之财,显示在净收入上。
>> So the operating I'm looking at the operating income and that's yeah that's much more stable. Um I'm not sure >> not sure what the massive adjustment uh it must be like a tax some sort of tax windfall probably that's uh showing up on the net income.
但营业利润从 6200 万、1.35 亿、1.57 亿增长。但它仍然预计在未来两年会下降。
Um but the operating profit has gone gone from 62 million 135 million 157 million. Um but it's still projected to fall off the next uh the next two years.
但不会太戏剧性,对吧?我认为那不应该太戏剧性。让我们看看 EV 对 EBID 是多少。那是 36 倍营业利润。
but not too dramatic, right? I think that should not too not too dramatically. Let's see what is it on an EV to EBID. It's uh 36 times operating profit.
我不知道,那不算……我的意思是,我认为基本上 36 倍营业利润,对于未来三年营业利润增长预期持平或温和下降,对于一家我们可能觉得没有护城河且存在真正终值风险的公司来说,这并不……
I don't know that's not I mean I think 30 basically 36 times operating profit for uh flat to modestly declining operating profit growth projections over the next three years um for a company with probably what we feel like is no moat and real terminal value risk doesn't
我想给 Duolingo 一个 F。我认为它是……我对此感觉不好。
I I want to put Duolingo an F. I think it's I don't feel good about it.
我想我们在播客中也讨论过这一点。他们有一个相当强的——这也不是那么正面——他们必须在增加广告投放或提高转化率,或者追求更多用户增长之间取得一个相当强的平衡。
The one thing um I think we also discussed it in the podcast. Um they have a pretty strong It's also not that positive. They have a pretty strong um balance they have to hit between doing more advertising or basically the conversion rate or going for more um for more user growth.
所以,我认为这就是他们正在倾斜的方向,也就是说,不再说你可以注册高级版,而是现在只想获得更多的日活跃用户,这正体现在数据中,这也是股价上涨的原因。
So, I think that's what they're kind of tilting in terms of, okay, instead of saying, well, you could sign up for the premium version, they now just want to get more daily active users, which is what's showing up in the numbers, which is why the stock is going up.
我认为,不能简单地说现在盈利能力如何,然后利润走势如何。这更像是你在用户增长数量和利润表现之间进行权衡,而且你总会遇到这种权衡。
I think it's it's not that easy to just say how profitable is it right now and then how are how's the profit going. It's more like the trade-off between how many users do you grow and then what's the profit doing and there's always a trade-off that you hit.
那么,为什么市场喜欢当前的数据,尽管增长看起来更糟?因为日活跃用户再次显著上升。所以,就像你在多邻国上一样,对吧?你打开应用,然后他们要么在你完成一个会话后向你展示一个按钮,让你转化为高级产品,要么就给你更多钻石之类的,让你作为日活跃用户留下来,这会在数据中相当显著地体现出来。
这又可以说是一件负面的事情,因为你不能两者兼得,或者至少不能达到同样的程度。你不能同时拥有用户增长和利润增长。
So, why is the market liking the current numbers although the growth is looking worse because daily active users is going up again quite significantly. So that's like whenever you're on Dualingo for example, right? You go on the app and then they either show you after you have an finished the session, they will either show you a button that converts you to the premium product or they will just, you know, give you more diamonds or whatever so you stay on as a daily user and that shows up in the numbers quite significantly, which again you could argue it's a negative thing because you cannot have both or at least not to the same extent. You cannot have user growth and then also the profit uh profits are growing.
但是,如果你从几个季度的角度来看,并且从估值角度来看它看起来更有吸引力,我不会太惊讶。仅仅基于这个想法。在2028年,他们将在当前140的基础上做到4美元VPS。那是前瞻35倍非GAAP。
非常昂贵。如果他们到2028年只做到4美元UPS,那非常昂贵。没错。
Um, but that's something that if you look at it in like a couple of quarters and it looks more attractive from a, you know, valuation lens, I wouldn't be too surprised. Um, just based on that, um, based on that idea. In 2028, they will do $4 VPS on a current value of 140. That's a forward 35 times be non-GAAP. Very expensive. If they only do $4 UPS in 2028, that's very expensive. That's right.
所以,尤其是相对于Adobe、多邻国和Wix,也许我们应该把它放在S级,因为你知道,在10年内。
So um you know especially relative uh to Adobe and Duolingo and Wix u may maybe we should just put it in the S tier because uh you know it in 10 years
现在,会有多邻国的股东告诉我们,我们怎么能把自由现金流将为负数的公司放在S级?嗯,你知道,多邻国在印钞。不,开个玩笑,我认为这是有道理的。
Now, we'll get Dualingo shareholders telling us, how can we put companies that are going to have free cash flow in the negatives in the S tier? Well, you know, Dualingo is printing cash. No, jokes aside, um, I think it makes sense.