Yet Another Value Podcast 对 $EL 的判断变化
假设ATL正常化顺利,他们仍将拥有现金余额。他们仍将拥有其机队的80%。而两年前,他们只拥有机队的50%。我一直在想这个问题。你说得对。这看起来像是这家公司盈利过高,对吧?你怎么能不担心它会均值回归,而股票表现不佳,因为那将非常困难。
assuming the ATL normalizes fine, they're still going to have a cash balance. They're still going to have They're still going to own 80% of their fleet. Like 2 years ago it was like it was only 50% of the fleet. I think about this all the time. You're right. Like this screams This thing is over-earning, right? Like how could you not be concerned that there's going to it's going to mean revert, and the stock's not going to work because it's just going to be very difficult.
我认为我会回顾他们上一个干净的年份,那实际上是夹在COVID和10月7日战争之间的2023年。在2023年,他们在资本支出、租赁和贷款摊销之后是盈利的。他们产生了大约1亿到2亿美元的自由现金流。
And I I think that I would I would point back to like their last clean year, which was really sandwiched between COVID and the and the war on October 7th was 2023. And in 2023, like they were profitable, you know, after CapEx, after leases, after, you know, amortization of loans. So, and they to the tune of like 100 to 200 million dollars in free cash flow.
所以我有点这样看。在最坏的情况下,假设他们回到那个水平,你看到的是一个20亿美元的企业价值,而正常化后至少有1.5亿到2亿美元的自由现金流,我觉得我愿意下这个赌注。
So, I kind of look at it like that. Like, worst-case scenario, I you know, that let's say they go back to that. Like, you're looking at a $2 billion EV and normalize, you know, at least 150 to 200 million in free cash flow, I feel like I'm willing to take that bet.
但我不认为那会很低,因为他们已经增加了大量运力。目前尚不清楚他们增加了多少运力,因为其中一些是湿租。这些湿租是他们拥有的临时租赁,但那只是少数。大部分是他们增加了自己的机队。
Um but like, I don't think I think that's going to be low because they permanent they they've added a lot of capacity. Um it's not clear how much capacity they've added because some of it is uh wet leases. So, those wet leases are, you know, they're temporary leases that they have, but that's the minority of it. That's the minority of it. The majority of it is just, you know, they've added to their fleet.
你的报告,再说一遍,那句关键的话,人们应该去读那份报告。它在结尾,但你的关键句是:“嘿,我们的下行风险有支撑,因为他们有我们谈到的13亿美元净现金。他们拥有很多自己的飞机,去看看飞机价格吧。”
比如,拥有飞机,所有这些飞机都在赚钱。你说:“嘿,他们拥有超过10亿美元的飞机,而且他们的品牌信用卡计划和忠诚度计划有外部估值,价值约7亿美元。”所以,那是35亿美元的硬资产价值,而企业价值,取决于你如何处理现金,大约是20亿美元,对吧?所以你是在以大幅折扣买入。
your write-up again the the killer line and people should go read the write-up. It's at the end, but the killer line you have is, "Hey, our the downside here is supported by they've got the 1.3 billion of net cash that we talked about. They own a lot of their planes and go look at plane prices." Like, owning planes the all these planes are in the money. You say, "Hey, they own a billion plus of planes and they've got an external valuation on their branded credit card program that's and loyalty program that's worth 700 millionish." So, that's 3.5 billion in kind of hard asset value versus an EV of you depending on how you keep treat the cash, 2 billionish, right? So, you're buying it at a substantial discount.
是的,我认为,你看,我是一名记者,不是航空专家。正确的估值方法可能是按拥有机队的百分比进行细分,但我认为从方向上看,在这个环境下,考虑到租赁成本高昂,你拥有的飞机越多,你的倍数就应该越高。
而且,资产负债表越好。我只是看到很多迹象表明,他们至少应该与行业其他公司交易一致,而不是折价。
Yeah, I I think um I mean, look, I'm a journalist. I'm not an airline expert. The right way to probably do the valuation is to like, you know, segment across like percentage of the fleet that is owned, but I think directionally, the more planes you own in this environment, given how expensive leasing is, the higher your multiple should be. And, you know, the the better the balance sheet. I mean, I just see a lot of things that indicate to me they should at least trade with the rest of the group and not at a discount.
现在,显然存在巨大的地缘政治风险因素,但尽管听起来很疯狂,他们已经证明他们可以在任何情况下飞行,而且他们有政府的隐性支持。所以,当情况变得非常紧张时,政府介入,基本上说,当商业保险公司退出时,他们会为飞机提供保险。
Now, obviously, there's a huge geopolitical risk factor, but as crazy as it sounds, like they've proven that like they can fly under all circumstances, and they have an implicit backstop of the government. So, like when things got really um intense, like the government stepped in, and, you know, basically, you know, said they would insure the planes when the private insurers would, you know, commercial insurers step out.
所以,我不想过度思考,但我认为他们至少应该与同行交易一致,那将是一个非常好的回报。问题显然是在什么倍数上正常化盈利,但那是猜测,你知道,他们的运力已经永久性增加。
So, I, you know, I don't want to overthink it, but I think they deserve, you know, at least to trade in line with the peers, which would be a really nice return from here. Question is obviously like on what multiple normalized earnings, but like, you know, that's that's the guesswork, you know, like there's been permanent, you know, increase in their capacity,
而且我认为,你知道,但现在最大的未知因素是航空燃油,所以那在某种程度上掩盖了潜在盈利能力的一些改善,但我认为一旦情况正常化,你将看到一个产生更多自由现金流的业务,它应该与同行交易一致。
and I think, you know, but like I, you know, the the the the big X factor now is like jet fuel, you know, so like that's kind of masking some of the um you know, improvement in underlying earnings power, but like I think once things normalize, you're just going to see a business that's generating a lot more free cash flow, and it should it should trade, you know, in line with the peers.
不,这很有趣,因为你知道,航空公司,我脑海中的一个问题是,嘿,每个价值投资者,你说航空公司,人们就会想到沃伦·巴菲特1990年的电话,1-800-Airlineaholic之类的,对吧?
但这里有趣的是,因为是以色列,所以有有限的时刻。而且它对我来说,你可以纠正我如果我错了,但它有很多纽约市的特征,在航空公司中,我记得在Spirit JetBlue审判中,是的,航空公司在国内市场上超级超级竞争,但纽约市的时刻有限,那些时刻非常宝贵,因为那些时刻,由于供应和大量需求涌入,那些时刻极具价值,利润丰厚。
你知道,我看以色列,我想你可以想象特拉维夫机场也有很多类似的情况。有限的时刻,大量的国际需求,你猜怎么着?所有人都离开了。所以这些家伙占据了特拉维夫大约50%的时刻。再次,如果我方向错了,你可以纠正我,但是的,他们增加了大量供应,但他们拿走了很多最好的供应,而且他们拥有它们,其他人没有办法进来,除非他们建一个新航站楼之类的。
所以,你有一个非常有趣的设置。你可以告诉我我是否在任何方面想错了。
No, and it's interesting cuz you know, airlines one of the questions I have in my head is kind of like, hey, everybody every value investor you say airlines and people think Warren Buffett 1990 call 1-800-Airlineaholic or whatever, right? But the interesting thing here is because it's an Israeli, like there are limited slots. And it it's got to me, and you can correct me if I'm wrong, but it's got a lot of the New York City components to it, where in airlines, and I remember this from the Spirit JetBlue trial, like yes, airlines are super, super competitive across the domestic board, but there's limited spots in New York City, and those are really valuable cuz those spots, because there's supply and a lot of demand coming in, those spots are hugely valuable, hugely profitable. You know, I look at Israel, and I think you could imagine a lot of the same with the Tel Aviv airport. There's limited spots, a lot of international demand, and guess what? Everybody left. So, these guys took, I think it's like 50% of the spots in Tel Aviv. Again, you correct me if I'm directionally wrong, but yes, there they put on a lot of supply, but they took out a lot of the best supply, and they own it, and there's no way out for anyone else to come unless they like build a new terminal or something. So, you've kind of got a really interesting setup there. You You can tell me if I'm misthinking about any piece of that.
现在,谁知道这场战争会持续多久?你知道,我前几天听谁说,每场战争开始时,军队都会在圣诞节前回家。这些事情的本质是它们比人们预期的持续更久。所以,我们已经进入伊朗冲突6个月了,谁知道呢,对吧?
所以我有点这样看,我会做多这个,只是基于正常化盈利,无论那是什么,你知道?而且我认为现在的设置是,你至少还有两个季度的巨额暴利,进一步降低你的企业价值。而且你买入的是市场第一,每个人都想拥有市场第一。
这是无可争议的第一。它拥有这些伟大的品牌。而且你知道,那让我克服了拥有航空公司的障碍,尽管你知道,它……
Now, who knows how long this war goes on? Like, you know, who was I listening to the other day that like, you know, every war that's been started like the troops are going to be home by Christmas. It's like the nature of these things that like they go on longer than people expect. So, like we're 6 months into this Iran conflict, like who knows, right? So, I kind of look at it like I would be long this, you know, just on normalized earnings, whatever those are, you know? And I think right now the setup is you have a few more at least, you know, two more quarters of like just gushing windfall profits that further kind of like buy down your enterprise value. And you're buying like the number one, you know, you're buying everyone wants to own the number one in a market. Like this is the undisputed number one. It has like these great brands. And um you know, that that kind of like got me over the hump to to own an airline as much as like you know, it's uh
让我回到你提到的利润,对吧?他们现在正在赚取暴利,因为战时,其他人都离开,他们得到了时刻。我认为人们可能会从两个方面看待暴利。其一,以色列国显然在这里有很大的发言权,对吧?他们被要求运营,而且我相信我们的运营协议的一部分规定,以色列国可以要求在极端紧急情况下运营,并且可以要求他们无论如何都要配备人员。
所以,我认为这有两面性。一方面,人们担心,“嘿,这些家伙会被要求在低迷时期不经济地运营。”然后反过来,你可以告诉我我是否错了,但你知道,我熟悉黄金股,所以我在准备这个播客的时候只是随便谷歌了一下。
黄金股是以色列拥有一些类似国有公司的一部分,赋予他们对合并等事项的否决权。当我在谷歌搜索时,我看到,嘿,他们因2023年10月至2024年5月期间过度和不公平定价而被竞争管理局罚款4000万美元。
这让我担心,“嘿,你会不会遇到最糟糕的情况,对吧?如果因为战争或其他原因没有需求,你会被要求飞行,但如果需求巨大,每个人都出来,你试图提高价格到战时价格,他们会对你处以罚款。所以,在低迷时期,你必须让所有产能运转,而在繁荣时期,你会因超常利润而被罚款。
那么,你会如何看待……那只是一般的以色列国风险,我想,但这也是监管风险,所有这类东西。
Let Let me go to you mentioned the profits, right? So, they're kind of making windfall profits right now cuz wartime, everybody else leaves, they get the slots. I think people might look at the windfall profits in two ways. One, they were the state of Israel obviously has a lot of say here, right? They were kind of required to run and I believe part of their our operating agreement says the state of Israel can require them to run in extreme emergencies and can require them to staff no matter what. So, I think there's two sides to that. One, people worry, "Hey, these guys are going to be required to run uneconomically on the downside." And then the counter is and you can tell me if I'm wrong, but you know, I I was familiar with the golden share, so I was just kind of googling around while I was prepping for this podcast. The golden share is Israel owns a piece of some like kind of state state-ish companies that gives them blocking rights over mergers and stuff. And as I was googling around, I saw hey, they got hit with a competition authority fine for $40 million for excessive and unfair pricing from October 2023 to May 2024. And that makes me worry, "Hey, are you going to have the worst of both worlds, right? If there's no demand because of war or something, you're going to be required to fly, but if you there's tons of demand and everybody's coming out and you try to kind of increase your pricing to wartime wartime pricing, they're going to hit you with they're going to hit you with fine. So, on the downside, you have to have all the capacity operating and on the upside, you get fined for the supernormal profit. So, how would you kind of think about the That's just general state of Israel risk, I suppose, but it's also like regulation risk, all of that type of stuff.
是的,你必须适应它。我认为首先,投资外国有点可怕。只是,你知道,有不同的货币和不同的政府。我认为以色列相对资本主义和理智。而且我认为,回到新冠疫情,他们没有救助航空公司这一事实。
任何事情都有可能,因为它是政府,但有一种认识和理解,他们在每月损失数千万美元的时候介入并救助了这件事。没有人知道这是在新冠最严重的时候。所以,我认为我的看法是他们尊重产权。是的,当然,El Al是政府的控股公司。
而且这实际上发生在今年四月。他们不得不以非常低的运力飞行,因为政府的限制,只是为了安全原因。当然,El Al做到了。但那是,你知道,这就是他们所处位置的性质。
Yeah, you have to get comfortable with it. Like I think first of all it's kind of it's scary to like invest in a foreign country. Um just it's just like, you know, there's a different currency and a different government. I think Israel is relatively, you know, capitalistic and sane. And I think that backdrop to go back to COVID, the fact that they did not bail out the airline. Like anything's possible cuz it's the government, but like there is there is like a recognition and understanding like they stepped into the lurch and bailed this thing out when they were like losing, you know, tens of millions of dollars on a monthly basis. Like no one knew this is in the depths of COVID. So, I think they my my my take on it is they respect the property rights. Yes, of course El Al is the holding to the government. Like in and that's actually what happened in April this year. Like they were, you know, they had to fly flights at like very, you know, very reduced capacity because of restrictions from the government just in for safety reasons. And of course El Al did it. El Al but that's like you know, that's just the nature of the um that's the position they're in.
另一个我认为重要的怪癖是,航空公司的大问题是他们都飞同样的飞机,对吧?他们都买同样的飞机,使用同样的机场。所以,你说得对,时刻很重要。但即使他们都有相同的时刻,你如何真正区分自己?
当然,这里那里有一些东西,比如机舱里的花哨功能。但El Al拥有领先的安全措施,没有其他人能像El Al那样做安全,原因很明显。安全措施的一部分是政府要求他们拥有这种超级安全。
这非常昂贵。他们在本地市场和外国市场都有人审讯乘客。他们会问你关于圣经的随机琐事,试图扰乱你,确保你不是恐怖分子。所以,这花费很多钱,政府通过法律强加给他们。所以,这可能被忽略了,但去年他们重新谈判了成本分摊协议,政府基本上分担了额外安全的成本。
关键是它更协作,像伙伴关系,政府欣赏他们所做的。他们介入并在所有人离开市场时提供了大量运力。所以,我不担心政府试图……我的意思是,看,你看到有诉讼,那是4000万美元。这不是小数目。
但这不是袋鼠法庭,他们不能在法庭上辩护。这是一个相当西方式的资本主义,你知道,你将能够为自己辩护。
Like what one other quirk that I think is important is that one of the things that differentiates You know, the big question with airlines is like they're all flying the same planes. Right? They all buy this like what, you know, they're all using the same airports. So, you're right. Like the slots are important. But even like once, you know, they all they all assume they already have same slots. Like how do you actually differentiate yourself? So, of course there's some things here and there like bells and whistles in the cabin. But El Al like has the leading security like like you know, end up There's no one else that does security like El Al does for obvious reasons. And so, part of the way the security works is that the government mandates that they have this like super security. It's very expensive. They have like they have people in local markets and also in foreign markets that like interrogate passengers. They'll ask you like random trivia about the uh the Bible to like, you know, they just like they just try to like, you know, mess with you to like make sure like you're not a terrorist. So, that costs a lot of money and the government imposes that upon them a law. So, like this was probably missed, but you know, last year they renegotiated that cost-sharing agreement and the government, you know, like they basically share the cost for that extra security. The point is it's more collaborative, it's like a partnership, like the government appreciates what they do. And they provide they stepped in and they provided a lot of capacity when everyone left the market. So, I'm not concerned about, you know, that risk that the government's going to try to I mean, look, you see this there's there was a lawsuit and like it's it's $40 million. It's not nothing. Um but it's not like a kangaroo court thing where like they can't have their day in court. It's like a pretty western capitalistic, you know, where they're, you know, you're going to be able to defend yourself and um
所以,你知道,你让这家公司以2倍EBITDA交易,而美联航是6倍。我想我的问题是,“嘿,一个主要是美国国内市场的规模化玩家,从忠诚度计划和信用卡积分中获得大量利润,我知道LL也这样做,但与美国消费者的力量相比,这相形见绌。
这真的是正确的比较吗?因为如果我去看第二梯队的航空公司,我想你会发现很多都在这个价格附近交易。”
So, you know, you've got this company you've got them trading at 2x EBITDA versus United Airlines at 6x. And I guess my question would be, "Hey, is a largely domestic US player scaled US player that gets a lot of profits from the loyalty program and the credit card points, which I know LL does as well, but I mean that pales in comparison to the might of the US consumer. Is that really the right comp? Cuz if I went to kind of the second tier of airlines, I think you'd find a lot of them are trading kind of around this pricing."
是的,我的意思是,我听到这种反驳。我想我会回到我之前说的,这个设置中有很多特征说明了资产的质量、耐久性、机会以及他们所处的利基市场。所以,这对他们来说是独特的。但是,是的,我没有研究过那些其他航空公司。所以,我……
Yeah, I mean, I I I I I I hear that pushback. I think I'd just go back to like what I said previously, that there's just a lot of characteristics in this setup that like speaks to the quality of the asset and the you know, the durability and opportunity and you know, like the the the niche that they play in. So, that's that would that's, you know, unique to them. Um but yeah, I don't I haven't studied those other airlines. So, like I
完全没问题。完全没问题。看,在某个时候,2倍EBITDA就是2倍EBITDA。但是,让我专注于EBITDA数字,因为我认为这是一个更有趣的问题,这也是让我印象深刻的一个。所以,EBITDA显然是息税折旧摊销前利润。
我在飞机和飞机租赁商方面做了很多工作。对于航空公司、飞机租赁商来说,最重要的事情是让飞机起飞,对吧?在地面上的时间越少,在空中飞行的时间就越多,因为飞机是你的大开支,折旧对飞机来说非常巨大。
LL遵循犹太节日,对吧?所以,他们在安息日不飞行,在主要节日也不飞行。所以,那大约是每年的12%到15%,他们不飞行,如果我算1/7加上一些节日正确的话。
It completely okay. Completely okay. And look, at some point 2x EBITDA is 2x EBITDA. But, let me focus on the EBITDA number cuz I I think this is a more interesting question, and this is one that jumped out to me. So, EBITDA obviously DNA is the back depreciation amortization. I've done a lot on aircraft and aircraft lessors. And like, you know, the most important things for aircraft for airlines, aircraft lessors, everything is getting the plane going, right? The The less time you can have on the ground, the more time you can have up in the air because the plane is your big expense, and that depreciation is is massive on the plane. LL follows Jewish holidays, right? So, they don't fly on the Sabbath, and they don't fly on major holidays. So, that's roughly what, 12 to 15% of the year that they're kind of not flying on if I'm doing 1 / 7 plus some holidays correct in my head.
是的,我认为这适用于两个方面,对吧?当他们购买飞机时,他们去买一架新的波音飞机,波音基本上会卖给最高出价者。El Al正在与泰国航空或Jet2等竞争,他们基本上会全天候运营。El Al会以那种数学计算26或类似的方式运营。
所以,他们为将要运营26的东西支付全天候的价格。所以,我的第一个问题是,他们如何让这种经济性运作?然后我的第二个问题是,如果我们以EBITDA估值,但15%的时间他们有一个非生产性资产,我们是否应该因为资产在地面上15%的时间而对他们进行削减?
Yeah, I think that applies in two ways, right? When they're buying aircraft and they go and they buy a new Boe- Boeing airline, the you know, Boeing's going to sell to the high bidder for the most part. Uh El Al is competing against, you know, Thai Airlines or Jet2 or who's going to run it 24/7 basically. El Al's going to run run it kind of in that math 26 or something. So, they're paying 24/7 pricing for something they're they're going to run 26. So, my first question would be, how can they make that economics work? And then my second question is, if we're valuing it on EBITDA, but 15% of the time they have an unproductive asset, should we actually be hair cutting them for that 15% of time the assets are on the ground?
是的,这是一个很好的问题。所以,我认为这很有趣。我认为这说明了已经发生的事情,他们已经拥有很大比例的飞机是自有的,然后就像我说的,自2025年以来,他们已经回购了九架飞机。
Yeah, it's a great question. So, and I think this is like interesting. I think this speaks to what's happened that they've they've they already had like a large percentage of their planes that were owned, and then like like I said, since 2025 they've they've bought back nine planes.
他们不分享他们承保的具体内容,但很明显,租赁不是最优的,可能是因为你提到的原因。我只是觉得总的来说,租赁已经变得贵了很多。当你租赁一架飞机时,你的总拥有成本,你必须以某种状态归还租赁的飞机,你必须重新做发动机等等。
如果你不是这样,你可能不会那样做,假设它是安全的,你会推迟定期维护。所以,我认为他们可能正在回应,这是现实的一部分,这就是为什么他们要买断他们的租赁飞机。
So, whatever, you know, like they don't share the exact, you know, what they're underwriting to, but like it seems very clear that leasing is not the optimal, you know, for it could be for the reasons that you've talked about. I just think in general like leasing has gotten much more expensive. Your total cost of ownership when you lease a plane, like you have to return the lease the plane in a certain condition, right? You have to like redo the engines and everything. Like you wouldn't do that if you were, you know, if you would probably whatever it is, you know, assuming it's safe, you would push out that scheduled maintenance. So, I think that, you know, they're they're probably responding, that's part of the reality is like why they're like buying their planes off lease.
你可以把EBITDA削减15%,但然后我会说,让我们看看上一个正常年份,他们当时做得很好。你知道,这个业务,6年前似乎是很久以前,但让我们看看疫情后,很难谈论疫情前,因为那是一个不同的业务。
新的所有权,不同的资产负债表,一切。但是,如果你按现状来看,我无法想象这些人在他们的市场上不会盈利的情景。
You could cut you could cut the EBITDA by 15%, but then I would just like let's look at the last normal year, like they were they were doing fine. You know, like this this business has been, you know, 6 years ago seems so long ago, but like let's the post COVID it's hard to like talk about pre-COVID because it was just a different business. Like it's new ownership, like different balance sheet, everything. But like, you know, if you take it as it is, like I can't envision a scenario where these guys wouldn't be profitable, like, you know, in their market.
只是,DNA线,我确实担心,我宁愿要这些人的1美元EBITDA,还是Jet2的1美元EBITDA,Jet2的折旧可能会低15%,因为他们运营的利润率高出7%到15%。
It is just you know, the the DNA line I do worry would I rather $1 of EBITDA from these guys or $1 of EBITDA from Jet2, where the depreciation is kind of going to be 15% lower at Jet2 just because they run at 7% 15% more.