MetaMuse launch is positive for META due to increased AI adoption/computing demand and new high-margin subscription revenue.

Now, speaking of competition, the perfect example is Meta, isn't it? Introducing MetaMuse, your personal AI agent from Meta that gets things done in every part of your life. So, we see this as being like, “This week has been busy, help me keep up with school emails.” He checks school emails. It gives you a list. One of the messages is about a list of supplies that came from the teacher, for example. Muse will go ahead and get everything ready for you. It sort of creates the order. Everything is done; artificial intelligence does the shopping, books meetings, and writes drafts. This is something other companies have already done. But Muse, remember that Meta has this huge ecosystem and it does a lot of things. He performs actual tasks on your behalf. But what excites me is that Meta is a platform with tremendous reach to the community. If more and more people are going to need to use artificial intelligence, especially something like an AI agent, it will only increase the adoption rate between humans and artificial intelligence. People will say, "Oh, I can use artificial intelligence for this, and for this, and for that." This will increase computing needs. I actually think this is very positive for Meta, because I think they've also started a monthly subscription now with this Muse model as well. And that's exactly what Mark Zuckerberg has been talking about in the past, isn't it? Mark Zuckerberg stated that he believes selling artificial intelligence will have higher profit margins than selling computing. And now he is doing that, isn't he? That's exactly what they're doing with this Muse. So, Muse AI, let me take a closer look at whether they have prices here or anything like that. Perhaps not here at the moment. But I think there is some form of pricing around $20 or more if you want to use some of these AI agents.