MRVL

Next one, plan B, is MRVL. Now this chart isn't too dissimilar to the last one I told you as far as setup is concerned, but right, but you have an additional factor with you.

So, there is this beautiful obviously down sloping trend line, which I've already highlighted on the chart for you. But, the secondary pattern, which you know, I'd argue could be even more powerful, is an inverse head and shoulders pattern.

Left shoulder, head, right shoulder, right? This spells a breakout for me.

Now, for me in Plan B , I'm taking a look here at Marvel, MRVL. So, the same thing. I want you to take a look at the chart and try to identify the gaps, and where Luton might be looking to enter this deal; I'll give you a moment to pause the video and take a look.

Okay, for me right away, remember that we are looking at the bottom of the red zone, 241.45, there will be a clear resistance level there. Why is this gap important ? Why is it meaningful?

Uh we made a call on our alpha report as well this morning that today uh could be a buying opportunity on AMD and Marll and both of these are up uh from the bell.

Nvidia, uh, Marll's moving. AMD is moving. Q's are moving.

and uh Marll, AMD, Nvidia, all pretty green.

Marll's up five.

Marvell and Qualcomm are preparing to capitalize on the growing demand for AI data centers . Marvell assists companies with integrated circuits designed for specific applications, and in connecting these components.

Based on all of the above, which of the two stocks is better to buy now: Qualcomm or Marvell? Looking at the revenue profile, Qualcomm is a much larger company compared to Marvel , with revenues more than four times those of Marvel, at $44 billion versus $ 9.45 billion for Marvel.

Um, honestly, "Credo," "Marvel," you know those, those people. While Avgo and Nvidia are probably the cheapest, even AMD, although more expensive, I'd say a little, let me see the expectations now.

So, if you go to, let me get it quick, if you go to Marvel, I'm at Marvel, and AMD is at 1.58. Marvell has a Profitability Growth Factor (PEG) of 1. Yes. So this is a coefficient of 1.

1.58 is the coefficient for "AMD" . Let's see. "Credo" is approximately 1. "Nvidia" is 0.75. 0.75. This is 1. Then if you go to "Broadcom". " Avgo", "Broadcom", " Broadcom" at 0.93.

Oh, we just did the math . Let me make sure it's still there . We literally just turned it on. 0.9. Yes. correct. So here. So, 0.9 . And now suddenly these men have started to become really cheap.

Like Salesforce, which went from nothing ridiculous, look, Salesforce is still at a coefficient of 0.91, 0.91 as an example. Bath at 0.92, ServiceNow at 153.92. Aya 1.53, I have an intention at.

0.9 , Axon 2.1. 2.19. What did you say about Intuit? I had already forgotten. I don't want to write it incorrectly and then get reprimanded. 0.9. You know, Snow is the anomaly here, isn't he ?

So, Snow is the anomaly in this insane assessment. But it's strange because these companies are making really good money , and they're being punished either because of fear, lack of margins, or because people think the bubble is over.

The only thing I can guess is. You know, when we look at this graph we have here. There is a fear that this shift in programming may not last. So, you know, I think if I look at this, I still like my opinion, and my conclusion is that I still like software right now.

But at some point, devices will become ridiculously cheap , to the point that they will once again become the new opportunity. Hmm, not yet. Perhaps we need an " anthropic retreat".

Good. I mean , Dell is doing well, but you also have the risk of splitting, right? Also, with regard to devices, this is where the risks of division come from. We've talked before about the risk of splitting here, where AI and frontier inference growth slows, while low-margin institutional inference explodes.

This may be what the markets are trying to explore, I don't know. if . My opinion remains that the software is really interesting. Snowflakes are really expensive. At some point, hardware becomes more desirable, but software is great.

I still believe that reaching the bottom in the third and fourth quarters is still possible. And depressions like Balantir are exploitable. In my opinion.