$AAPL

AAPL 当前估值缺乏吸引力:约 10% 的增速对应 29-34 倍市盈率,若要实现两位数回报,需要更快的增长或大规模回购。

看跌他说的是几年内
《This Stock will Change Early Investors LFE‼️》
Financial Education发布 2026-09-17 · 14 段内容
10:09/ 打开原视频

逐段跳播

14 段内容
10:0916:39

我们会给你举一个非常好的例子,它是有史以来最漂亮的商业模式之一,那就是 Apple。Apple 在过去 20 到 25 年里是一家出色的成长型公司,这一点没有争议。

So, we'll give you a very good example of one of the most beautiful business models ever, which is Apple, right? Apple, a fantastic growth company over the past 20 or 25 years, no argument there, right?

想想看。Steve Jobs 在上世纪 90 年代末回归 Apple,并稳住了资产负债表。他当时已经是一位经过验证、能力出众的 CEO。此后,他们还稳住了自己的电脑业务,砍掉了一些糟糕的业务和产品,并推出了 iPod 和 iTunes 商店。

然后,大约在 2003 年,事情开始变得疯狂起来。因此,在那一刻,他们已经拥有了非常稳定的商业模式。

Think about it. Steve Jobs returned to Apple in the late 1990s and stabilized the balance sheet. He was already a proven and competent CEO , wasn't he? Now, they have also stabilized their computer business, gotten rid of some bad businesses and products, and launched the iPod and iTunes store.

And then , things started to go wild around 2003, didn't they ? Thus, at that moment, they already had a very stable business model.

听着,对于像 Apple 这样一家在此时拥有经过验证的 CEO 和稳定商业模式的公司来说,现在这是一家你可以下注的公司,因为你可以说,这不会是它们唯一一次创新。它们会推出其他改变游戏规则的产品。

它们有 Steve Jobs 这个人领导公司。他一次又一次地证明了自己有能力创造出迅速走红、开始疯狂销售的产品。因此,这会是一段你可以押注这家公司的时间。

Listen, with a company like Apple, which has a proven CEO and a stable business model at this point in time, right? This is now a company you can bet on because you can say this won't be the only time they innovate.

They will come up with other game-changing products . They have this guy, Steve Jobs, leading the company. He has proven time and again his ability to create products that take off and start selling like crazy, hasn't he ?

And so it would be a period of time in which you could bet on the company.

听着,如果你在 2003 年押注 Apple,那时该股已经比几年前大幅上涨了。但这没关系。你不会拿到最低点的价格。如果你在 1998 年押注 Apple,那是押注 Apple 风险非常高的时候。

商业模式和资产负债表状况都不好。在 2003 年、2004 年和 2005 年押注 Apple 要容易得多,因为那时它们已经稳定了。容易得多。也许赚不到多少钱,但你猜怎么着?如果你在这些年份押注 Apple,你已经赚到了改变人生的利润。

Listen, if you had bet on Apple in 2003, the stock had already risen considerably from what it had been a few years prior. But that's okay . You won't get the price at the very bottom.

You know, if you bet on Apple in 1998, that was a very risky time to bet on Apple . The business model and balance sheet were not in good shape. Betting on Apple in 2003, 2004 and 2005 was much easier when they had stability, okay ?

Much easier. There may not have been much money to be earned, but guess what? If you bet on Apple in these years, you have made life-changing profits.

然后 Apple 出现了,并在 2007 年发布了 iPhone。这是一个新的市场机会。这是一个回顾当年 Apple 的绝佳机会。而这还是在我进入市场之前。我大约到这个阶段才进入市场。

但随着 Apple 成长进入一个新领域,这是一个绝佳的机会。它们在一个新领域里成长。你仍然可以押注 Apple,你可以看到它们将如何发展这项业务。然后它们在 2010 年发布并展示了 iPad。

它们正更多地转向移动设备。然后,大约在这个时候,它们发布了 AirPods 和 Apple Watch。它们下一代改变游戏规则的产品。因此,你可以看到这家公司如何能够继续成长并扩张进入新市场。

这并不只是,你当时看着它,会以为它只局限于电脑。然后 iPod 出现了,反应是:“好,我们明白了。”接着是 iPhone 和 iPad,而在 Steve Jobs 和 Jony Ive 的时代发生的事情当然是传奇性的。

Then Apple comes along and unveils the iPhone in 2007. A new market opportunity , isn't it? This is a great opportunity to look back at Apple in those days , isn't it? And this was before I entered the market, wasn't it?

I haven't entered the market until about this stage. But this was a great opportunity as Apple grew into a new field. They are growing in a new space, aren't they? You can still bet on Apple and you can see how they will be able to grow this business.

Then they release and showcase the iPad in 2010. Well, they're moving more towards mobile devices, are n't they? Then, around this time, they release AirPods and Apple Watch, right?

Their next generation of game-changing products. Thus, you can see how this company can continue to grow and expand into new markets. It wasn't just, you know, you could look at it at the time and think it was confined to computers only.

Then the iPod appeared, and the reaction was, "Okay, we get it." Then came the iPhone and the iPad, and what happened in the era of Steve Jobs and Jony Ive was legendary, of course, wasn't it?

因此,你可以看到这家公司如何能够继续成长并扩张进入新市场。这并不只是,你当时看着它,会以为它只局限于电脑。然后 iPod 出现了,反应是:“好,我们明白了。”接着是 iPhone 和 iPad,而在 Steve Jobs 和 Jony Ive 的时代发生的事情当然是传奇性的。

Thus, you can see how this company can continue to grow and expand into new markets. It wasn't just, you know, you could look at it at the time and think it was confined to computers only.

Then the iPod appeared, and the reaction was, " Okay, we get it." Then came the iPhone and the iPad, and what happened in the era of Steve Jobs and Jony Ive was legendary, of course, wasn't it?

因此,你今天看待 Apple 的方式与你在那个时代看待 Apple 的方式完全不同。听着,如果你这些天在考虑投资像 Apple 这样的公司,它更接近于一只价值股。那么,关于价值股你需要看什么?

一只有分红的股票。你需要考虑像竞争优势这样的东西。比如公司的竞争优势有多强,能否顶住竞争对手。所以,如果我是在看像 Apple 这样的股票,这些天我会去思考 Apple 的生态系统。

我不会真的去想接下来会怎样,它们会不会发布下一款 iPhone?不,它们不会发布一款革命性的新 iPhone。它们只会随着时间推移,简单地继续开发和略微改进它们现有的产品,仅此而已。

Therefore, the way you view Apple today is completely different from how you viewed Apple during that era. Listen, if you're considering investing in a company like Apple these days, okay?

It is closer to being a value stock. So, what do you need to look at regarding value stock? A stock that pays dividends. Well, you need to consider things like competitive advantage.

Like how strong the company's competitive advantage is to stand up to competitors, right ? So, I would be thinking about Apple's ecosystem these days if I were looking at a stock like Apple.

I'm not really going to think about what's next, whether they'll release the next iPhone? No, they're not going to release a revolutionary new iPhone, okay? They will simply continue to develop and improve their existing products a little over time, and that's all there is to it, right ?

所以,并不是说它们需要推出一款没人见过的、全新的、改变游戏规则的产品。它们只需要随着时间推移,一点一点地继续改进它们现有的产品。

So, it's not as if they need to introduce a new, game-changing product that no one has ever seen before, is it? They just need to keep improving their existing products little by little over time, right?

所以,得益于软件这一侧,它们围绕自己的业务拥有良好的竞争优势。对于像 Apple 这样的公司,我会从我为每股支付市盈率与该公司预期未来增长率相比的角度来思考。这应该以某种方式引导我判断 Apple 是不是一个好的买入机会。

So, they have a good competitive advantage around their business thanks to the software side, right ? I think about a company like Apple in terms of the price-to-earnings ratio I pay per share compared to the expected future growth rates of that particular company.

This should guide me in some way to determine whether Apple is a good buying opportunity or not, right?

好,以下是我对 Apple 未来几年的预测。我相信 Apple 将实现平均约 10% 的营收增长。我相信它将在净利润上实现类似的平均增长。

Okay, here are my predictions for Apple over the next few years, right ? I believe Apple will achieve revenue growth of approximately 10% on average. I believe it will achieve similar growth in net income on average, don't you think ?

现在,对于像 Apple 这样拥有如此强大竞争优势、并实现如此增长率的公司,我不可能把它估值为 29 到 34 倍之间的市盈率。

Now, for a company like Apple that has such a strong competitive advantage and is achieving such growth rates, I can't possibly value it at a price-to- earnings ratio of between 29 and 34 , can I?

在这种乐观情景下,Apple 的复合年增长率将大致与 S&P 500 相当。所以,要让 Apple 成为一项非常合理的投资,它们必须首先随着时间推移回购大量股票。因为那将有助于更快地提高每股收益,所以如果你能让净利润平均每年增长 12%,假设这种乐观情景,如果你回购大量股票,你的每股收益可能增长 14% 左右,从而使你从该股获得的复合年增长率高于这里所显示的。

Under this optimistic scenario, Apple's compound annual growth rate would be roughly in line with the S&P 500, wouldn't it? So, for Apple to be a very sensible investment, they must first repurchase a large quantity of shares over time, right?

Because that will help raise earnings per share more quickly, so if you can increase net income by an average of 12% per year, right? Assuming this optimistic scenario, if you repurchase a lot of shares, your earnings per share could increase by 14% or so , making the compound annual growth rate you would get from the stock higher than what is shown here , right?

或者你需要 Apple 在未来几年以高于平均每年 10% 的速度增长。如果它能做到其中任何一项或两项都做到,Apple 很可能在未来四到五年实现两位数的回报。

Or you need Apple to grow at a faster pace than 10% per year on average over the coming years. If it can do either or both of those things , Apple is likely to achieve double- digit returns over the next four or five years .

但如果它们做不到,那么 Apple 现在实际上并不是一只非常有吸引力的买入股票。因此,根据我的数字,Apple 并不是一只非常有吸引力的买入股票。它不是一只糟糕的股票。简单来说,在我看来,未来四到五年,市场上有远比像 Apple 这样的公司好得多的机会。

But if they can't do that, then Apple isn't actually a very attractive stock to buy right now, is it? Therefore, based on my numbers, Apple is not a very attractive stock to buy.

It's not a bad stock. Simply put, there are far better opportunities in the market in my opinion over the next four or five years compared to a company like Apple, right?

这个频道对 $AAPL 的历次判断

Financial Education 在这只股票上共 2 条判断,这里只列相邻的几条。

2026-09-17看跌本条
我们会给你举一个非常好的例子,它是有史以来最漂亮的商业模式之一,那就是 Apple。Apple 在过去 20 到 25 年里是一家出色的成长型公司,这一点没有争议。
2026-09-02
苹果在这里被高估了,特斯拉被严重高估了,对吧?所以,这两只股票因估值而被淘汰了,对吧?
原话 29:17 ›
看完整历史 ›
美股听风