$AMZN

Amazon在资本成本和基础设施方面的结构性优势,使其成为长期赢家,也是高增长AI股之外波动更低的替代选择。

看涨他说的是几年内
《What If NVIDIA Isn't the Future? 4 AI Stocks to Own Now》
The Motley Fool发布 2026-09-15 · 5 段内容
05:57/ 打开原视频

逐段跳播

5 段内容

好,我们要谈的第三只股票是另一家这样的巨头。这是一个主题,这些公司中有很多都是世界上最大的公司之一,但 Amazon 不仅是 Nvidia 最大的客户之一,而且也是一家试图摆脱 Jensen Huang 掌控的公司。

All right, number three stock that we want to talk about is another one of these huge players. This is This is a theme that a lot of these companies are some of the biggest companies in the world, but Amazon, not [snorts] only one of Nvidia's biggest customers, but again, another one that's trying to get out from under Jensen Huang's thumb.

Tranium 是他们拥有的芯片,所以这有点类似于 Alphabet 的 TPU。而 Tranium 是那种——它稍微落后一些。他们不像 Alphabet 那样已经研发了十年。

但最近关于它的数据显示,他们一直在极其快速地改进。我认为对于 Amazon 需要考虑的一点是,其激励因素非常不同。所以,他们不需要像 Alphabet 那样在构建自己的模型方面成为领导者。

他们可以更像一个商品供应商。而如果这最终真的成为一个商品化业务,那么问题就在于谁拥有成本最低的基础设施?所以,你把 Nvidia 芯片的毛利率拿掉。如果你使用自己内部开发的芯片,那笔开支你就不会有了。

他们也非常高效。他们做这件事已经很久了,所以他们有非常低的资本成本。他们有这个庞大的零售业务,恰好有点像是一个飞轮,他们也可以依靠。但这就是 AWS 的力量以及他们构建产品和基础设施的方式,我认为这将成为他们的巨大优势。

而且,顺便说一句,他们已经拥有大量数据,来自全世界数百万家公司。所以,把所有这些加起来,我认为 Nvidia 想成为 GPU 业务中的垄断者。但是,当你有像 Alphabet 和 Amazon 这样的大公司作为客户时,他们会试图将自己的供应商商品化。

而我认为这是那些一次又一次做到这一点的公司之一。我想我们会在这里看到同样的事情。

Tranium is the chip that they have, so that's going to be kind of analogous to the TPUs at Alphabet. And Tranium is one of those It's a little bit behind. They have not been building it for a decade like Alphabet has.

But, the data on it more recently has been that they have been improving extremely quickly. And I think the thing to think about with Amazon is that the incentives are very different.

So, they don't need to be a leader like Alphabet does in building their own models. They can be more of a commodity supplier. And if this ultimately does become a commodity business, then the question is going to be who has the lowest cost infrastructure?

So, you take Nvidia's gross margins from their chips. That's an expense that you're not going to have if you're going to be using your own internally developed chips. Uh they've also been extremely efficient.

They've been doing this for a very long time, so they they have low very low cost of capital. They have this huge retail business that just, you know, happens to be sort of a flywheel that they can also kind of lean on.

But, that's where this power of AWS and the way that they built the the the product and the infrastructure, I think is going to be a huge advantage for them. And oh, by the way, they've already got a ton of data for, you know, millions of companies all around the world.

So, you add all of that up, and I think that Nvidia would like to be the monopoly player in the GPU business. But, when you have huge company a huge companies like Alphabet and Amazon as your customers, they're trying to, you know, kind of commoditize their suppliers.

And I think this is one of the companies that has done it over and over again. I think we'll see the same thing here.

而且对于像 Amazon 这样的公司,我认为也有太多的可选性,而这一切真的都归结为每个 token 的成本是多少,我认为这可能是找到代理指标的最佳方式。所以,如果你只是把它们与像 CoreWeave 这样的公司比较,例如,最大的 Neo Cloud 之一,Amazon 就是会有更低的资本成本。

所以,CoreWeave 可能签下一个大客户,那个项目可能是盈利的,但如果他们的资本成本是,比如说,债务 12%,股权将是 15 到 20%,因为投资者会想要在此基础上获得溢价。

Amazon 的资本成本要低得多,低得多,可以说是其一半,即使他们在举债。我确实想指出,这是一家随着他们建设大量 AI 基础设施而正在增加债务负担的公司,但我认为这种成本优势是那些较新、较小的公司根本无法与之竞争的。

再加上他们已经拥有的、他们在业务中已经拥有的势头,以及在此基础上还有 Tranium,我只是认为这将是我在过去 6 个月到一年里一直有点忽视的公司之一,而随着这只股票变得可能更有吸引力一些,我只是认为它将在未来很长、很长一段时间内成为一个巨无霸。

And with a company like Amazon, too, I think there's just so much optionality and it all really comes back to what is the cost per token, you know, I I think that's probably the best way to kind of find a proxy.

So, if you just look at them versus a company like CoreWeave, for example, one of the biggest Neo Clouds, Amazon's just simply going to have a lower cost of capital. So, CoreWeave may sign a big customer and it you know, they may have that may that project may be profitable, but if their cost of capital is, you know, 12% for debt, equity is going to be, you know, 15 to 20%, you know, because you're going to investors are going to want a premium on top of that.

Amazon's cost of capital is much, much lower, half that, if you will, even if they're even if they're taking out debt. I do want to point out that this is a company that is increasing their debt load as they build out a lot of this AI infrastructure, but I think that cost advantage is something that these newer, smaller companies are just not going to be able to compete with.

You add to that the the that they already have, the momentum that they already have in the business, and T uh Tranium on top of it, I I just think this is going to be one of the companies that I've kind of overlooked even over the past, you know, 6 months to a year, and as the stock has gotten maybe a little bit more attractive, I just think that it's going to be a juggernaut for a very, very long time to come.

好,我想以一点估值方面的内容来结束,因为你看我们谈到的那些较大的公司,Alphabet 的市盈率约为远期盈利预期的 25 倍,Amazon 约为远期预期的 27 倍,AMD 和 Marvell 则处于非常不同的境地。

AMD 约为远期预期的 47 倍,Marvell 约为 43 倍。

All right, I want to end with a little bit on valuation because you look at the bigger companies that we talked about, Alphabet, trading for about 25 times forward earnings estimates, Amazon trading for about 27 times forward estimates, AMD and Marvell in a very different boat.

Uh AMD trading for about 47 times forward estimates and Marvell at about 43.

也许我应该这样回答。我的意思是,我认为你应该预期 AMD 和 Marvell 相比 Amazon 和 Alphabet 会有更高的 beta 或更高的波动性。所以,如果你今天想进行单笔投资,也许你想要 Amazon 和 Alphabet 这些 beta 较低的股票,而且你不太担心大幅回调,因为这些都是庞大而强大的公司。

如果你更担心波动性,也许 Marvell 和 AMD 是你可以定投买入的,同时明白它们很可能在某个时点会大幅走低,也会大幅走高。你不知道顶部和底部在哪里。所以,你只是对一个头寸进行定投。

Well, maybe I should answer it like this. I mean, I think that you should expect higher beta or higher volatility with AMD and Marvell compared to Amazon and Alphabet. So, if you are looking to make a single investment today, maybe you want the lower beta stocks in Amazon and Alphabet and you're not too worried about a huge pullback because these are huge powerful companies.

If you're more concerned about the volatility, maybe Marvell and AMD are ones that you dollar cost average in, understanding that chances are they will be significantly lower at some point and also significantly higher.

You don't know where the top and the bottom is. So, you're just going to dollar cost average a position.

这个频道对 $AMZN 的历次判断

The Motley Fool 在这只股票上只有这一条判断。

2026-09-15看涨本条
好,我们要谈的第三只股票是另一家这样的巨头。这是一个主题,这些公司中有很多都是世界上最大的公司之一,但 Amazon 不仅是 Nvidia 最大的客户之一,而且也是一家试图摆脱 Jensen Huang 掌控的公司。
看完整历史 ›
美股听风