$BE

Bloom Energy是关键的AI硬件投资标的,增长强劲且利润率改善,但客户高度集中于Oracle以及利润率上行空间有限,使其更像短期动量交易而非基本面买入;公允价值在90至178美元之间,股票AI目标价为124美元。

他说的是几个月内
Memory Stock Crash, Bessent Bailout, Iran, Stocks & Real Estate
Meet Kevin发布 2026-08-24 · 30 段内容
01:34/ 打开原视频

完整内容

30 段内容

这条视频里关于 $BE 说的每一段,按说话顺序排列。点任意一段,上面的视频跳到那里。

14:32每一格是一段原话 · 点一下跳到视频的那个位置388:17

人们也对Bloom Energy感到非常非常兴奋。这家公司确实已经回落了很多,而且他们有非常大的涡轮机。我开玩笑的。他们没有涡轮机。呃,他们是一家燃料电池公司,而且他们在那些燃料电池上有相当不错的定价权,因为你可以在大约三到四个月内安装好它们,比安装天然气涡轮机快得多。而且我并不完全理解它是如何工作的,但我认为你可以基本上通过化学方式将天然气转化为能源,而不只是点燃它,这非常吸引人。呃,这看起来有点酷。总之,那一直是数据中心的一个重要组成部分,因为嘿,我可以更快地建立数据中心。你知道,建造你自己的天然气设施需要数年时间,更不用说获得许可了。这太疯狂了。所以,呃,我们拭目以待。

People have also been very very excited about Bloom Energy. This one has really been retracing down a lot and they have very large turbines. I'm just kidding. They don't have turbines. Uh they're a um they're actually a fuel cell play and they they have pretty good pricing power on those fuel cells because you can set them up in like three to four months substantially faster than you can set up natural gas turbines. And I don't really understand fully how it works, but I think it's very fascinating that you could basically chemically turn natural gas into energy uh without just lighting it on fire. Uh which is that's seems kind of cool. Anyway, that's uh that's been a big uh data center uh component because hey, I could stand up a data center way faster. You know, it takes years to build uh like a you know, your your very own natural gas facility, let alone to get the the permitting for it. It's crazy. So, uh we'll see.

好的,所以公司的收入增长了一倍多,对吧?所以跳到这里。这是我们的上涨除以401。我们的收入上涨了2.65倍。收入成本是7097除以294,2.4倍。所以那里有一些定价权,对吧?比如收入增长更快,但不是快很多。产品成本实际上上升了,那实际上是负的PP。哦,产品成本上涨了2.99倍。所以实际上服务稳定了,安装上涨了除以38.2。哦不,安装只上涨了33%到38%。服务也上涨了一小部分,14%。呃,所以基本上这里发生的是他们能够以更高的价格出售,但成本也更高。所以他们能够以更高的价格出售,但成本以比价格上涨更高的速度上涨。呃,而且安装/服务增长没有那么快,使得毛利率看起来在改善,因为你知道显然安装那些的成本没有飙升。劳动力保持相当相似。GNA,我的意思是这没问题。173除以110,更多的营销,一切都没问题。这里的57%也表明有定价权。所以那相当不错。是的。呃,让我们看看他们的估值预测,看看那些西装革履的人在预测什么,然后我们实际上可以跳进去看看我们认为这家公司值多少钱。

Okay, so revenue for the company is more than doubled, right? So hop in here. This is we're up divided by 401. We're up 2.65 X on revenue. Cost of revenue is 7097 / 294 2.4x. So um some pricing power there, right? like the the revenue is accelerating faster but not much faster. Product costs went up actually that's negative PP right there. Ooh 2.99x on product costs up. So really service stabilized installation went up divided by 38.2. Oh no installation's only up 33 38%. and service is up a fraction as well, 14%. Uh, so product basically what's happening here is they're able to sell it for a higher price, but the costs are also higher. So they're able to sell for higher prices, but costs are higher at a higher rate than uh price increases. Uh and um install/service not growing as fast makes uh uh gross margin uh look like it's improving because you know obviously the cost of installing those aren't skyrocketing. The labor stays pretty similar. GNA I mean this is fine. 173 divided by 110 more marketing everything. This is fine. and 57% here uh suggest pricing power as well. So that's pretty good. Yeah. Uh let's look at the forecast on on the valuation for them just to see what the suits are forecasting and then we can actually jump in on uh what we think this company's worth.

所以,2026年底的预测每股收益是255。未来四年的增长是8475。那太惊人了。呃,加上5829加2897加253,除以4,我的意思是预测49%的增长,显然会逐渐放缓到大约25%。所以,可以说未来四年预测增长50%,逐渐放缓到25%。那么,如果我现在,嗯,让我们看看这里,毛利率,他们的毛利率仍然在35%左右。那非常好,即使他们是制造商。所以,假设你可以用,比如,我不知道,就用24吧。也许没那么高。也许用22的市盈增长比率。那可能很有趣。那么,让我们看看这个家伙值多少钱。嗯,如果我按2.55乘以2.44,呃,乘以50,我得到大约306,那相当不错,表明在2.4的市盈增长比率下有上涨空间。好的。那么,让我们看看,试着想想这个的增长预测。好的,那是24。如果我现在按25%的未来增长,在24。哎呀。嗯,25。该死。好的。2.55。嗯,我的意思是,它应该是减半。所以,那将是大约150美元乘以,呃,2.44乘以25%的增长,把它放在大约153美元。那很有趣。让我们看看。所以,这真的取决于你认为公司的增长会在哪里稳定,这也会影响到Anthropic的情况,因为你知道,如果他们能继续蓬勃发展,以及他们提供的服务,那很好。我们有的预测增长,是的,50%,那听起来是对的,因为他们是制造商。所以,有可能那太激进了,然后对收益的预测。好的。那么,让我们做这个,我们称之为激进的,你知道,更软件级别的,你知道,24的市盈增长比率,对吧,因为软件高利润率,软件高利润率,24到,到,呃,可能略高于3,对于软件,我可能有点激进,这也取决于这些利润率如何维持,因为如果利润率压缩,因为什么驱动收入,让我们找出,是定价吗?我的意思是,显然单位增长在发生,但让我们去看看收入,嗯,让我们看看,收入,收入,哦,他们与Oracle有合作,那也非常有趣。而且Oracle有选择权以113美元购买300万股。哦,他们真幸运。好的,对他们有好处。所以,他们在那些认股权证上获利颇丰。那非常好。所以,他们在那里做了一笔好买卖。AI基础设施基金有点循环。我们知道。这是他们的债务。他们的债务是0%可转换。你在开玩笑吗?哦,那太好了,伙计。看看那个。30亿美元的可转换。那是这里结束的三个月。是的。然后他们还偿还了一堆,他们实际上偿还了一堆他们的零可转换。哇。有点惊讶。但无论如何,从利息的角度来看,那很好。好的,在某个地方我应该看到更多关于他们收入的评论,但我想我错过了。我想我错过了。子,我已经在后续事件了。我的意思是,每家公司都有点不同,但资本调用。我们看到了Oracle的部分,贷款,合资企业。我们看到了。这都是资产负债表的东西。那是Oracle。哦,我真的必须错过了。他们并不真的让这些文件容易阅读。不,它肯定还在下面。股票薪酬,或有事项,所得税,后续事件,信贷额度,营业收入。在那里。哦,我刚看到它,我搞砸了。加油,Kevin。经营活动。更高水平的新存款,系统组合,较低比例的无重大前期建筑的项目。啊,有趣。所以我总是觉得那有趣。更多这些前期存款不一定好。我不喜欢太多前期存款,因为它表明大部分W已经在现金流量表上了,对吧?就像你已经定价了。哦,看看他们的现金流。但如果那些是前期存款,那就不太理想,对吧?存款,供应商付款的时间,那是为了他们的现金流。库存增加,他们的现金流收益率已经很低。交付和安装收入。哇,它一直在下面这里,他们谈论它。总收入,呃,是由更高的产品收入和服务收入的增加驱动的。是的,他们不会谈论为什么增加主要是由于对我们电力解决方案的更强需求,以满足增长市场的时间到电力需求。为更大的AI客户和通过Brookfield合资企业的多个项目的重要部署。嗯,那是循环收入部分。是的,我的意思是,但那有道理。AI项目。好的。所以,收入成本,产品成本。啊,股票薪酬在那里,因为我们看到股票薪酬被提升,但他们实际上看到了更多的制造效率。那有趣。所以,股票薪酬影响了销售成本,我想知道他们是否把它计入像销售佣金之类的。那有趣。好的。那么,如果我现在去看利润表,如果我给他们一个较低的利润率,比如让我们用,嗯,如果你用1.6的市盈增长比率,对吧?所以,就像你知道,一个脏的市盈增长比率,你知道,7%的利润率,1.6,称之为你的35%净,让我们假设,让我们按那个运行,让我们做2.55乘以2,哦,抱歉,乘以,呃,1.6的市盈增长比率乘以50%的预测增长,我在204,255乘以1.6,在只有25%的情况下,得到大约100。所以,你知道,如果我们给这个定价,上涨空间,你现在必须相当看涨才能达到300。我理解为什么有很多兴奋,但要达到300,而且它曾经在300,但要真正证明那个300,你可能必须看到更高的利润率和这种支出继续。所以,这个肯定有一些风险,尤其是现在有了Nancy Pelosi的交易。是的,人们对内幕交易非常兴奋。但那有趣。让我们去简要看看他们的财报电话会议。

So, EPS projected end of 2026 is 255. Forward growth four years is 8475. That's phenomenal. Uh plus 5829 plus 2897 + 253 equals divided by 4 equals I mean projecting 49% growth obviously tapering off to about 25. So call it 50% growth on four years projected tapering to 25%. So if I now uh let's see here margins gross profit their margins are still in like the 35% range. It's very good uh even though they're a manufacturer. So, let's say you could go with like a I don't know, just go with like a 24 maybe. Maybe maybe not that high. Maybe like a 22 peg. That could be interesting. So, let's see what this puppy's worth. Um, if I go with 2.55* 2.4 4 uh times 50 I get to about 306 which is pretty good suggests upside uh at 2.4 peg. Okay. So the let's see here trying to think of growth forecast for this. Okay, that's at 24. If I now run it at 25% forward growth uh at 24. Oops. Um 25. Dang it. Okay. 2.55. Well, I mean it should be half. So it'll be like 150 bucks times uh 2.4 4* 25% growth puts it at about $153. So that's interesting. Let's see here. So it really comes down to where you think growth will stabilize for the company, which that also then plays into the anthropic situation because you know if if they could keep booming and the services they're providing, great. The forecast growth we have yeah 50% that sounds right is a manufacturer. So it's possible that could be too aggressive and then forecasts on earnings. All right. So let's do this is this we'll call it an aggressive you know aggressive more software level you know 24 peg right cuz software high margin software two high margin software two four to to three uh maybe slightly above three for software I might be a little aggressive with this with and it also depends on how these margins sustain because if the margins compress because what's driving revenue let's find out is it pricing I mean obviously unit growth is happening but let's go look a little bit revenue uh let's see here revenue revenue oh they have a partnership with Oracle that's also Very interesting. And Oracle got options to buy 3 million shares at 113. Oh, lucky them. Okay, good for them. So, they're nicely up on those warrants. That's very good. So, they made a good buy there. The AI infrastructure fund is a little bit circular. We know that. Here's their debt. Their debt's a 0% convertible. Are you kidding me? Oh, that's so nice, dude. Look at that. $3 billion uh of a convertible. That's three months ended here. Yeah. And then they paid off a bunch of They actually paid off a bunch of their zero convertible. Wow. Kind of surprised by that. But anyway, that's great for an interest point of view. Okay, somewhere here I should see a little bit more on their revenue commentary, but I think I missed it. I think I missed it. Sub, I'm already at subsequent events. I mean, every company does this a little differently, but cap calls. We saw the oracle piece, the loans, the joint venture. We saw that. This is all balance sheet crap. That was Oracle. Oh, I really must have missed it. They don't exactly make these documents really easy to read. No, it must still be down there. Stock comp, contingencies, income taxes, subsequent events, credit facility, operating income. There we go. Oh, I just saw it and I screwed it up. Come on, Kevin. Operating activities. uh higher level of new deposits mix of system lower proportion of projects without significant upfront building buildings. Ah interesting. So I always think that's interesting. The more of these upfront deposits that's not necessarily good. I dislike too many upfront deposits because it suggests most of the W is already on the cash flow statement, right? like you're already pricing in. Oh, look at their cash flow. But if those were upfront deposits, that's less ideal, right? Deposits, the timing of vendor payments, that's for their cash flow. Inventory increased and their cash flow yields already very low. Delivery and installations revenue. Wow, it's all the way down here is where they talk about it. total revenue uh was driven by higher product revenue and an increase in services revenue. Yeah, they're not going to talk about why increase was primarily to a stronger demand for our power solutions to meet the time to power needs of the growing market. Significant deployment for larger AI customer and multiple projects through join venture with Brookfield. Well, that's the circular revenue part. Yeah, I mean but that that makes sense. AI projects Okay. So, cost cost of revenue, cost of product. Ah, the stock comp was in there because we saw that stock comp get boosted, but they're actually seeing more manufacturing efficiency. That's interesting. So, stock comp hit the cogs as well as I wonder if they build that into like com sales commissions, right? That is interesting. Okay. So, if I now go to the income statement and if I give them a lower margin like let's go with um if you go with a a 1.6 peg ratio, right? So like you know one peg dirty you know 7% margins 1.6 call that your 35% net let's say let's run it at that let's go 2.55 * 2 oh sorry times uh 1.6 peg times 50% forecast growth I'm at 204 255 time 1.6 at just 25% get to about 100. So, you know, if if we price this the upside here, you have to get pretty bullish now to get to 300. I get why there's a lot of excitement, but to and it was at 300, but to really justify that 300, you'd probably have to see higher margins and and this spend just continue. So, there's definitely some risk baked into this one, especially now with the Nancy Pelosi trade. Yeah, people get really excited about uh you know, the insider trades. But that's interesting. Let's go look at their earnings call briefly.

是的,Bloom Energy 的社交媒体讨论量翻了两番。是的,因为大家都在谈论 Nancy Pelosi。这太搞笑了。Nancy。好的,让我们把它传过来。好的,Bloom Energy 财报电话会议。我也记下来了。我觉得这有点好笑。X 的交易量。然后让我快速过一遍。好的。股票 bloom。那么,让我看看。好的,没问题。稍等。好的,抱歉。好的,很好。完成了。那么,现在让我们看看那次财报电话会议,看看里面有什么料。我真的很想看到订单预测之类的。因为我想看到增长率。我要输入 forecast。不。用 growth 这个词怎么样?好的,我们确实有 growth 这个词。快速增长的 TAM 和市场份额增加的顺风。那真的很好,对吧?所以,看涨 TAM。然后我有:因此,我们对 2026 年及以后的增长轨迹有可见性和信心。你控制模型 T 的成本等等。考虑到这一点,我们来看一些数字,等等。利润率扩张,这应该会继续推动利润率扩张。是的,这是关键。他们已经给出了指引。这就是你真正需要推动股价或估值走高的东西。但这仍然非常好。这可能只是证明作为制造商,接近 167 的市盈率是合理的。营业利润率 21%。这是什么?这是毛利率。营业利润率接近 21% 作为我们的指引。嗯,等等。我们这边有什么?损益表。我有毛利润。是的,有那个 30。嗯,那有点,355 除以 1065 是 33。所以毛利率是 33.3,指引是 35% 左右。好的。然后净利润方面,他们带来大约 198 除以 1065,即 18.5% 的净利率。啊,是的,是的,你知道,这就是为什么预测的市盈率不可能这么高。嗯,所以它甚至可能更低,对吧?因为他们实际上接近 20%。20%,你知道,可能更接近 14。让我快速算一下。我很好奇。255 * 1.4 * 50 是 178,178.2,然后 255 14 什么?是的。一半是 89。所以这真的取决于你给它的倍数。嗯,你想给它什么市盈率?是的。18% 的净利率。他们指引 21%。好的,那是增长。让我们看看 8 年前。21% 负 21。是的。是的。看,他们实际上也经常谈论利润率波动。他们也知道这一点。所以你现在正处于上升期,这就是为什么股票表现这么好。让我们看看 AI 计算几个月的积压订单等等。好的。传统积压订单直到 2029 年,对吧?这就是为什么我们需要更多的 Bloom Energy 积压订单。客户可以通过我们的技术比燃烧替代品更快地获得空气许可证。是的,因为你谈论的是几个月而不是几年。有弹性的供应链,等等。好的。我们这里有什么?那是每股收益增长指引组合。好的。不,不。我们见过这个。不在乎。那很无聊。好的。所以,那里没有什么特别令人兴奋的。显然,很多交易关注将集中在 Nancy Pelosi 的披露上。

Yeah, Bloom Energy social media volume quadruples. Yeah, cuz everybody's talking about Nancy Pelosi. That's hilarious. Nancy. Okay, let's get that beamed over. Okay, Bloom Energy earnings call. I write that down, too. I think that's kind of funny. Volume for X. And then let me run this through really quick. Okay. Stock bloom. So, let me see here. Okay, that's fine. One sec. All right, sorry. Okay, good. That's done. So, now let's look at that earnings call and see what juice we have in here. I really want to see like order forecasts. So, cuz I want to see that growth rate. I'm going to type in forecast. No. How about the word growth? Okay, we do have the word growth. Tailwinds of rapid TAM growth and increasing market share. That's really good, right? So, bullish TAM. Then I've got consequently we have visibility and conviction of the growth trajectory into 2026 and beyond. You control the cost of the model T blah blah blah. With that in mind, go through some of the numbers, whatever. Margin expansion, which should continue to drive margin expansion. Yeah, that's the key. They're already guiding that. That's what you need to really push this higher or or the valuation higher. But that's still very good. It just probably justifies closer to a 167 peg as a manufacturer. Operating margin of 21%. What is this? That's gross margin. Operating margin closer to 21% as our guidance. Well, hold on a sec. What do we got over here? Income statement. I've got gross profit. Yeah, there's that 30. Well, that's a little what 355 divided by 1065. That's 33 on the gross. So 33.3 gross guiding 35%ish. Okay. And then on the net they're bringing about 198 divided by 1065 18.5% net. Ah yeah yeah that's you know that that's why the forecast peg it just can't be this high. Uh, so it might even be lower, right? Cuz they're actually closer to 20%. 20%, you know, might be closer to call it 14. Let me just run that math really quick. I'm curious about that. 255 * 1.4 * 50 178 178.2 two and then 255 14 what? Yeah. Half 89. So it it really depends on the multiple you give this. Uh what peg do you want to give it? Yeah. 18% net. They're guiding 21%. Okay, that's growth. Let's look at 8 years ago. 21% negative 21. Yeah. Yeah. See, like they literally talk talk about margin swings a lot too. They know it as well. And so you're on you're on an upswing right now and that's why the stock is performing so well. Let's look at the uh bookmarks months of AI compute blah blah blah. Okay. Legacy backlogs are until 2029, right? This is why we need more Bloom Energy backlogs. Customers can get air permits with our technology faster than they can with combustion alternatives. Yeah, cuz you're talking about months instead of years. Okay. Resilient supply chain, whatever. Okay. What do we got here? That's the EPS growth guidance mix. Okay. No, no. We've seen this. Don't care. That's just pretty boring. Okay. So, nothing ridiculously exciting there. Obviously, a lot of trade attention is going to come into Nancy Pelos's disclosure.

嗯,Bloom Energy 直到最近才在净利润率上转正。这是真的。我的意思是,他们亏钱了。21 22 23 24 25。哇。好的。让我看看我还能在这里得到什么。我只是在看一些历史数据。共识估计的净利润率确实到 2028 年将他们带到大约 22%。那差不多是你达到顶点的位置。好的。让我们记下来。所以收入我们自 2021 年到 2025 年一直有负利润率,刚刚转正,到 2028 年达到 22% 的顶峰。所以这里有一个限制。这些燃料电池制造成本高。所以实际上有点难,就像你不会变成软件风格的利润率,对吧?你是制造商。事情就是这样。

Uh, Bloom Energy has only recently been positive on net margin. That's true. I mean, they lost money. 21 22 23 24 25. Wow. Okay. Let me see what else I can get here. I'm just looking at some historical data. Consensus estimates for net margin do take them up to about 22% by 2028. That's kind of where you top out. Okay. Let's write that down. So income we've had negative margins negative margins since you know 2021 to 2025 just went positive top out at 22% in 2028. So there's a limit here. These are pricey to manufacture fuel cells. So it's it's kind of hard to actually it's like you're not you're never going to turn into like a software style margins, right? You're a manufacturer. That's just the way it is.

好的。那么,Bloom,Bloom Energy,把他们的数据放进来,我们可以真正分解一下。好的。砰。全部发过去。好的。那么,Bloom,我认为这是一个真正关键的硬件投资,来自负利润率,对吧?所以关键的 AI 硬件投资,来自净负利润率。嗯,由于高制造成本,利润率的上行空间有限。我们在损益表中已经看到了一些。因此,这证明了比苹果更低的市盈率是合理的。

Okay. So, Bloom, Bloom Energy, drop their data in here and we can really break this down a little bit. All right. Boom. Send all that through. Okay. So, Bloom, I would argue that it's a really critical hardware play coming out of negative margins, right? So critical AI hardware play uh coming out of net negative margins. Uh the upside to margin is limited due to high uh manufacturing costs. We see some of that in the income statement already. Therefore, uh justifies a lower peg than say an apple.

Bloom,我认为这是一个真正关键的硬件投资,来自负利润率,对吧?所以关键的 AI 硬件投资,来自净负利润率。嗯,由于高制造成本,利润率的上行空间有限。我们在损益表中已经看到了一些。因此,这证明了比苹果更低的市盈率是合理的。

Bloom, I would argue that it's a really critical hardware play coming out of negative margins, right? So critical AI hardware play uh coming out of net negative margins. Uh the upside to margin is limited due to high uh manufacturing costs. We see some of that in the income statement already. Therefore, uh justifies a lower peg than say an apple.

所以,40% 的毛利率对比大约 35%。你正在接近。你正在接近。好的。好吧。我认为这是一个公平的比较。所以,我几乎会称他为某种程度上的 AI 基础设施的苹果,减去软件部分。所以我得重写这个。嗯 Bloom Energy BE 产品的毛利率正在接近苹果。苹果上个季度产品的毛利率是 40%。Bloom 产品的毛利率是 593 除以 935 是 63.4 36.5 36.5% 的产品。所以实际上类似于苹果,嗯,对苹果有利,嗯,所以称之为市盈率助推器的是苹果拥有的额外服务收入,而 Bloom Energy 实际上没有。所以你知道苹果会得到那个额外的 ARR,而 Bloom 不会。

So, 40% gross margin versus like 35. You're getting there. You're getting there. Okay. All right. I think that's a fair comparison. So, I would almost call him like the Apple of AI infrastructure to some extent minus the the software part. So I got to rewrite this. Uh Bloom Energy BE uh gross margins on products are approaching Apple. Apple last Q gross margins are uh 40%. on products. Bloom uh gross margins are on products 593 divided by 935 63.4 36.5 36.5% on a product. So it's actually similar to Apple uh benefit for Apple uh so call it a PEG booster is the extra services revenue that Apple has which Bloom Energy really doesn't. So you know Apple's going to get that extra ARR that Bloom just won't.

所以目前,嗯,目前它的交易价格是多少?我们目前交易在什么价位?我们交易在大约 205 或什么的。看看当前的估值能源。是的。205。好的。205 除以预测的 255 收益。目前交易在 ADX 收益,50% 的平均 4 年增长,在那四年结束时逐渐减少 25%。所以我通常做数学的方式是现在它交易在 80 除以 50。交易在大约 1.6 的市盈率。那是,你知道,没有大的服务组件,那是公平的。你知道,上行空间有限。上行空间在动量之外有限,对吧?所以,我会说定价权。嗯,是的,虽然。嗯,所以我称之为绿色,绿色的股票比较提升,有点影响定价权,可能在销售激励上,对吧?好的。资产负债表动量,然后公司的估值是黄色的,你知道,还算公平。好的。周线图上的动量是中档,所以称之为黄色。然后资产负债表,他们刚刚还清了一堆债务,这非常有用。所以,它在变绿,你知道,变绿。嗯,他们刚刚还清了 2030 年可转换债券的一部分债务。好的。所以,是的,我的意思是,正在发生的事情是公平的。我不认为这是我会跳进去的东西,因为我认为这是非常动量驱动的短期上涨,很大程度上是由于 Nancy Pelosi 7 月 24 日披露的 15K 股加期权。那天股票交易在 184 到 215 之间,我想。你知道我们今天看到它跌到 185。

So currently um currently it's trading for what are we currently trading for? We're trading at like call it what 205 or something like that. See the current valuation energy. Yeah. 205. Okay. 205 divided by forecast of 255 in earnings. Currently trading for ADX earnings with 50% average 4-year growth 25% tapered at end of that four years. So the way I would usually do the math is that right now it's trading for 80 divided by 50. trading for about a 1.6 peg. That's, you know, without without a big services component, that's fair. You know, the the upside is limited. Upside uh is limited outside momentum, right? So, I'd go pricing power. Uh yes, though. Um, so I call it greenish greenish uh stock comp boost somewhat hit pricing power the potentially on sales incentives, right? Okay. the balance sheet momentum and then the valuation valuation for the company is yellow you know fairish. Okay. Momentum on the week chart is mid-range so call it yellow. And then the balance sheet, they just paid off a bunch of debt, which was very useful. So, it's greening, you know, greening. Uh they just paid off uh chunk of debt, their 2030 convertibles. Okay. So, yeah, I mean, it's it's fair what's happening. I I don't think it would be something that I would jump into just because I think it is very m momentum driven uh short-term pop uh heavily due to Nancy Pelosi 15K share plus options uh disclosure July 24. That day the stock traded uh between 184 to 215 I think it was. You know we saw it get down to 185 today.

好的。那么让我们把它放入 bloom,让我们确保我们也有当前的估计。Bloom Energy。嗯,只是高一点。酷。好的。那就是 Bloom。

Okay. So let's put that into bloom and let's make sure we also have the current estimates for it. Bloom Energy. Uh just a little bit higher. Cool. All right. So that's Bloom.

嗯。好的。我们可能会对此做一个小总结。但我想看看苹果一会儿。苹果怎么样。想想苹果。我的意思是 Bloom 的增长是疯狂的。苹果的增长明显较慢,但这已经计入每股收益增长水平,因为只是为了比较,让我们把苹果作为比较。

Huh. Okay. We might do like a little summary on that. But I want to look at Apple for a moment. How is See in Apple. Think about Apple. I mean Bloom's growth is insane. Apple's growth is significantly slower, but that's already factored into the EPS growth level because just for comparison, let's put Apple in as a comparison.

嗯,BE 更接近公平,我认为其中很多可能只是关于 CEO 过渡的炒作。

Uh where be is closer to fair and and a lot of that I think is probably just hype on the CEO transition.

好的。那么,毛利率,让我们看看。是的,苹果我知道是好的。那大约是服务 75% 的毛利率。那是 Bloom 没有的东西,因为苹果卖出的产品越多,那就越成为服务的销售宣传。所以,你真的更集中在制造方面,这创造了一些风险,这可能就是为什么苹果的定价强得多。嗯,对吧。所以苹果的定价反映了产品带来的 ARR,在我看来。

Okay. So, gross margin, let's see. Yeah, se Apple I know is okay. That's about a 75% gross margin on the services. And that's the thing that Bloom doesn't have because the more products Apple sells, the more that becomes a sales pitch for the services. So, you're really much more concentrated on the manufacturing side that creates some risk and that's probably why Apple is pricing so much stronger. Uh, right. So Apple's pricing uh reflects that ARR the products enable you know in my opinion.

所以,他们与甲骨文的交易占了第二季度收入的绝大部分。这真的很有趣。甲骨文的交易可能是最大的风险之一。那么,他们有没有提到集中度、地理、客户风险?在这里。是的。是的。是的。看那个。在这三个月期间,来自两个客户的收入,其中第二个是关联方,附注11,占我们收入的44%和21%。哇。在之前的六个月期间,来自一个客户的收入占我们收入的73%。哦,这对他们的AI基金和甲骨文来说真的很重。这几乎是甲骨文醉酒的债务的供应商。这让我更加看空。嗯,我要记下来。这是个大问题。所以,可能最可怕的一句话。好的。所以这是过去六个月收入的73%,一个客户甲骨文,而第一季度甲骨文占44%。抱歉,那是第二季度。所以甲骨文在醉酒消费,而Bloom接住了。你知道,他们在接住这些钱。

So the Oracle deal they have is the vast majority of their Q2 revenue. That's really interesting. The Oracle deal is probably one of the biggest risks. So, did they say that uh concentration uh geographic customer risk? Here we go. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Look at that. During the three months, revenue from two customers, the second of which is a related party, note 11, accounted for 44% and 21% of our revenue. Wow. During the prior six months, revenue from one customer accounted for 73% of our revenue. Oo, that's really heavy on their AI fund and uh Oracle. This is almost a supplier to Oracles drunken debt. That makes me more bearish. Uh, I'm going to write that down. That's that's a big point. So, probably probably the scariest line. Okay. So this is 73% of rev in last 6 months one customer Oracle and um 44% of Q1 was Oracle. Sorry that was Q2. So Oracle is drunk spending and Bloom picks it up. You know, they're picking up the dollars.

在这里。Nancy Pelosi 的定期交易报告,这是一种花哨的说法,说她逢低买入,可能是她丈夫,但这不重要,因为天哪,他们刚刚花了数百万美元购买 Bloom Energy 和 Intel。在这篇文章中,我们将分解你需要了解的关于 Bloom Energy 的一切,但值得注意的是,他们花了数百万美元。我看到至少价值 15,000 美元的股票购买。我看到购买的看涨期权执行价为 100 美元。所以对于一年期来说,这是深度实值。他们在 7 月 24 日进行了这些购买。所以像往常一样,已经过了 2 个月。哦,实际上不,正好过了 30 天。自交易以来正好过了 30 天。所以当然,我们晚些时候才得到消息。如果你记住一个月前发生了什么,你会记得那正是 Leo 被折叠的时候。谁知道 Nancy Pelosi 有什么内幕信息,但这没关系,因为在 24 日,股票交易价格在 183 美元到最高 218 美元之间。这正好在 Bloom Energy 现在交易价格 25 美元的执行价范围内。那么,这是一笔好交易吗?你应该买这只股票吗?他们到底是做什么的?好的,让我们保持非常简单,因为显然它远低于 351 美元的高点。这比该公司的峰值下跌了 61%。那么是什么推动了这种基本面势头?答案是两者兼而有之。所以关于 Bloom Energy 的事情是这样的。Bloom Energy 是一家燃料电池供应商,以天然气为燃料,然后通过化学方式将其转化为能源。所以,这有点像点燃它,比如燃气发动机,但有点不同。但关于 Bloom Energy 的迷人之处在于,他们过去的利润率非常差,而由于数据中心繁荣,他们的利润率正在飙升,当你查看他们的损益表时,现在真的很好。过去不是这样的。他们在 21、22、23、24、25 年都有负利润率。你懂的。但现在看看这个。他们的收入增长了 2.65 倍,超过 10 亿。他们的毛利润大约在 33% 到 35% 左右。他们的产品毛利率实际上在 37% 左右。然后当然你还有安装和其他一些低利润率的东西。他们现在给底线带来约 18.5% 的利润,在财报电话会议上,他们指引约 21% 的底线利润和约 34% 的顶线利润。那么为什么全年毛利率 34% 很重要呢?嗯,因为那真的和苹果很相似,这有点令人兴奋,因为你知道苹果是一个利润率很高的企业。我们知道他们的东西不便宜,但如果你去看苹果的财务报表,你会看到他们的产品毛利率也在 37% 左右。现在,事情是

Here it is. Nancy Pelos's periodic transaction report, which is a fancy way of saying she bought the dip and it was probably her husband, but it doesn't matter because dang, they just spent millions of dollars buying Bloom Energy and Intel. In this, we're going to break down everything that you need to know about Bloom Energy, but it's worth noting they spent millions of dollars. I see at least $15,000 worth of share uh purchases. I see call options uh that were purchased with a strike price of $100. So well in the money for a year out. Uh they made these purchases on July 24th. So as usual, it's been 2 months. Oh, actually no, it's been exactly 30 days. It's been exactly 30 days since the transaction. So of course, we get the news late. If you keep in mind what was going on a month ago, you'll remember that that was exactly when Leo pulled was getting Leo folded. Who knows what kind of insider information info Nancy Pelosi had, but that's okay because on the 24th, the stock traded between $183 and a high of $218. That's literally in the strike range for where Bloom Energy is trading now at $25. So, is it a good deal? And should you buy the stock, what even the heck do they do? Okay, let's keep this really simple because obviously it is well down from its high of $351. That is a fall of 61% from peak in the value of this company. So what drove that fundamentals momentum? The answer is both. So here's the thing about Bloom Energy. Bloom Energy is a fuel cell provider that gets fueled with natural gas and then chemically converts it to energy. So, it's a little bit different than just like lighting it on fire like a you know a gas engine for example. Uh but what's fascinating about Bloom Energy is they've had really bad margins and because of this data center boom their margins are blowing up and when you look at their income statement it's really good right now. Now it didn't used to be. They had negative margins in 21, 22, 23, 24, 25. You get the idea. But now look at this. Their revenue has 2.65xed to over a billion. Their gross profit is sitting at about 33 to 35ish%. They're they've literally got gross margins on their product that are like 37ish%. And then of course you've got like install and some of these other lower margin things. uh they bring about 18.5% to the bottom line now and in their earnings call they're guiding about 21% that they can bring to the bottom line and about 34% that they can bring to the top. Now why does 34% on gross margin matter for the full year? Well, because that's really similar to Apple, which is kind of exciting because you know Apple's a pretty high margin business. We know their stuff isn't exactly the cheap for a pretty penny, but if you go to the Apple financial statements, you'll see that their products also sell for about a 37% gross margin. Now, the thing

所以,这实际上不仅仅是一个数据中心赌注。这就像是对甲骨文的赌注。

So, this is actually more than just a data center bet. It's all It's like a bet on Oracle.

关于Bloom Energy,但值得注意的是他们花费了数百万美元。我看到至少有价值15,000美元的股票购买。我看到购买了行权价为100美元的看涨期权。所以对于一年期来说,这些期权是深度实值的。他们在7月24日进行了这些购买。所以像往常一样,已经过去了2个月。哦,实际上不是,正好过去了30天。自交易以来正好过去了30天。所以我们当然会晚些时候得到消息。如果你记得一个月前发生了什么,你会记得那正是Leo被折叠的时候。谁知道Nancy Pelosi掌握了什么样的内幕信息,但没关系,因为在24日,该股交易价格在183美元到218美元的高点之间。这正好在Bloom Energy目前交易价格25美元的行权范围内。所以,这是一笔好交易吗?你应该买入这只股票吗?他们到底是做什么的?好吧,让我们保持简单,因为很明显它远低于351美元的高点。这意味着公司价值从峰值下跌了61%。那么是什么推动了基本面动能?答案是两者兼有。关于Bloom Energy,事情是这样的。Bloom Energy是一家燃料电池供应商,使用天然气作为燃料,然后通过化学方式将其转化为能源。所以,这有点像点燃它,比如燃气发动机,但有点不同。但关于Bloom Energy的迷人之处在于,他们过去的利润率非常差,而由于数据中心的繁荣,他们的利润率正在飙升,当你查看他们的利润表时,现在确实很好。以前不是这样的。他们在21、22、23、24、25年都有负利润率。你懂的。但现在看看这个。他们的收入增长了2.65倍,超过10亿美元。他们的毛利润大约在33%到35%左右。他们的产品毛利率实际上大约在37%左右。然后当然还有安装和其他一些低利润率的东西。他们现在给底线带来约18.5%的利润,在他们的财报电话会议中,他们指导说可以给底线带来约21%,给顶线带来约34%。那么为什么全年34%的毛利率很重要呢?因为这与苹果非常相似,这有点令人兴奋,因为你知道苹果是一个高利润率业务。我们知道他们的东西并不便宜,但如果你看苹果的财务报表,你会发现他们的产品也以大约37%的毛利率销售。现在,苹果与Bloom Energy的不同之处在于,苹果以约70%到75%的毛利率销售服务,而Bloom Energy没有。所以苹果产品以约37%的利润率销售。所以你知道,你卖出100美元的东西,37美元进入企业,他们可以用于研发、GNA或广告等。然后他们缴税。然后他们得到净利润。他们从100中剩下370亿美元。这很好,因为它不仅给你37美元。它还会让更多人注册iCloud订阅,或者你知道,他们为音乐或任何其他产品(包括存储)提供的任何生活软件订阅。这对苹果来说是一个巨大的胜利,因为它的利润率非常高。另一方面,Bloom Energy,你必须认为它主要是高毛利率的制造方面。这很重要的原因是它限制了他们的净利润。我们真的不期望Bloom的净利润会超过25%。因为他们没有服务方面。他们仍然在制造成本高昂的东西。这些燃料电池很棒,因为你可以在3到4个月内建立起来,而数据中心的天然气设施可能需要大约3到4年才能建立起来。所以,出现了巨大的繁荣,让我们用燃料电池来建立数据中心,这样我们可以快速启动并缩短数据中心的上线时间,这非常重要,因为猜猜Bloom Energy最大的风险是什么,他们的主要客户。所以,这是客户集中风险,我认为这是一个非常大的红旗。这并不是说我看空这家公司。我们稍后会讨论目标价,但他们有严重的收入集中。他们上个季度收入的44%来自Oracle。在过去的6个月里,73%来自Oracle。Oracle是那种肮脏的数据中心股票,其信用违约互换继续飙升,因为人们认为他们承担了太多债务。违约风险很高。Oracle的股票也没有给他们带来什么好处。如果你看Oracle股票从峰值到现在,143除以351,这几乎与Bloom Energy在350年代中期的高点相同。这下跌了近60%。这主要是因为他们的债务。那么谁在承担这些债务呢?是Bloom Energy,现在因为Nancy Pelosi的披露而获得了巨大的动能。盘中,由于Nancy Pelosi的披露,它上涨了约11%,正好在我的206线,这是一个斐波那契回撤线。也许我们能够维持并突破。但你可以看到,自6月Google和SpaceX事件以来,该股一直在下跌。为什么?可能是增长可见性。这就是这些公司的真正重要之处,我们试图预测增长。看,苹果的增长不是很高,但很稳定。苹果的增长大约是9%稳定。这意味着他们现在的市盈率大约是3.7。在我看来,苹果现在实际上被高估了约40%,因为我喜欢将35倍市盈率除以增长,然后想,我不想为这种增长支付那么多。现在,有希望CEO能帮助公司转型为更多产品和更多AI收入,但很多希望现在已经计入价格了,对吧?另一方面,Bloom Energy,让我们看看Bloom Energy的预测。所以,如果我想在上涨方面非常激进,我给他们一个非常高的,接近软件级别的市盈率增长水平,我可以拿他们预测的每股收益2.55美元,给它一个2.4倍乘以50%增长的倍数,我得到306的目标价。但问题是,增长上升到50%将会逐渐减弱,特别是随着Oracle长期购买减少,预计在四年内,三到四年内会逐渐下降到25%。所以,如果我以25%的增长乘以24倍乘以他们今天的每股收益,我今天的公允价值实际上是153。所以在205,你知道,我们更接近这个,但我的上行空间是什么,对吧?我的上行空间是期望这能永远持续繁荣和增长,但我真的依赖Oracle。所以这意味着我需要扩展到不同的客户。我需要向Oracle销售更多。我不想押注Oracle。或者我需要我的利润率上升。利润率不错,但我们已经看到一些压力,对吧?收入增长了2.6倍,产品成本增长了2.9倍。所以成本增长高于收入。他们说部分原因是他们不得不增加基于股票的薪酬支付给销售,这在我看来表明他们的销售人员非常努力地争取这些销售和合同签署。如果我必须支付更多,而我无法提高价格或收入,那么这让我质疑这种收入的可持续性有多久。所以,我不是说这是一笔坏交易。我是说有集中风险。有很多动能,公司正在增长利润率。我必须承认这一点。他们确实承认利润率波动很大。他们在这里说。嘿,我们一直是负的。我们八年前上市。在那段时间里,我们从负到正。有很多变化,但我们对自己的总可寻址市场非常乐观。我们认为有巨大的顺风。我们将能够增加市场份额,获得更多客户。你知道,也许Oracle只是开始。他们还有一个关联方购买他们自己的产品。这是一个他们基本上与Brookfield Asset Management合作运营的基金。所以,在他们的一些集中风险中,你实际上会看到,嘿,我们的一些销售去了一个关联方实体。那是他们的AI基金。他们的AI基金自然购买Bloom Energy产品。但同样,上个季度这占他们收入的21%。所以他们自己的循环融资占收入的21%。上个季度Oracle占44%。前一个季度Oracle更多。对吧?所以如果你失去循环部分或失去Oracle,你就会失去我们看到的很多增长动能。现在希望你能获得新客户。但这就是你在利润表上下的赌注。现在现金流看起来不错。但现金流收益率有点低。好的。我们有大约1%的现金流收益率,不到1%。Palantir也大约是1%的现金流收益率。这与软件股票非常不同,软件股票的交易价格大约是10%的现金流收益率。一个例子可能是Salesforce。Salesforce是我们发送的买入提醒之一,价格约为每股163美元。记住,你总是可以通过meet Kevin会员参与其中。你得到所有课程、每个交易提醒、每个私人直播、所有alpha、基本面分析、技术分析。所以像这样的东西每天都在我们的课程会员直播中。加入我们。使用优惠券代码J-Hole。税务专业人士说这也可以作为税收减免。并在8月27日到期前使用该优惠券代码。所以让我们继续,看看他们的资产负债表。他们的资产负债表不错。我们有26亿美元现金,有8亿美元的账单要付。所以,我的资产负债表相当不错。但我有2.4的长期债务,不过我要说这些长期债务主要是2030年的可转换负债,票息为0%。所以,当他们有0%的贷款时,他们并没有垂死或淹没在债务中。基本上,这相当不错。所以,关于Bloom Energy有很多令人兴奋的地方。我理解,我理解这种动能。我认为这项技术很出色。我认为它非常非常聪明。但我确实认为有一些风险因素,所以我们的股票AI工具,基本上试图使用我的大脑和调整算法与人工智能相结合,给你几个预测。我们将看看苹果和Bloom Energy。所以,苹果非常有趣,因为我在看股票AI标签之前计算了,我认为苹果值多少钱,我以我认为合理的市盈率增长比率运行,比如2.4、22左右,我认为苹果被高估了40%,这是我得出的估计。我在mekevin.com的股票AI工具显示苹果有45%的下行空间。所以,这里不太兴奋,只是因为太多的希望已经计入价格。也许增长率会飙升。如果苹果的增长率因新产品和可折叠手机而飙升,那么你可以为这家公司证明更高的公允价值,更高的终值。但我们真的依赖增长,而且我们并没有以折扣价获得苹果来证明对冲这种增长是合理的。如果我看Bloom Energy,我在stocki上的目标价是124。为什么?我们之所以更低,是因为我在利润表上给出的例子是更激进的市盈率增长。我认为306到153需要更高的净利润率,这家公司无法实现。所以,更现实的是,你可能在90美元到178美元之间,取决于你使用的增长比率,这意味着对我来说,这更像是一个短期交易,而不是一个基本面的对冲买入。可能是一个动能游戏,但这就是我对Bloom和苹果的看法。一定要加入我们在mekevin.com。

about Bloom Energy, but it's worth noting they spent millions of dollars. I see at least $15,000 worth of share uh purchases. I see call options uh that were purchased with a strike price of $100. So well in the money for a year out. Uh they made these purchases on July 24th. So as usual, it's been 2 months. Oh, actually no, it's been exactly 30 days. It's been exactly 30 days since the transaction. So of course, we get the news late. If you keep in mind what was going on a month ago, you'll remember that that was exactly when Leo pulled was getting Leo folded. Who knows what kind of insider information info Nancy Pelosi had, but that's okay because on the 24th, the stock traded between $183 and a high of $218. That's literally in the strike range for where Bloom Energy is trading now at $25. So, is it a good deal? And should you buy the stock, what even the heck do they do? Okay, let's keep this really simple because obviously it is well down from its high of $351. That is a fall of 61% from peak in the value of this company. So what drove that fundamentals momentum? The answer is both. So here's the thing about Bloom Energy. Bloom Energy is a fuel cell provider that gets fueled with natural gas and then chemically converts it to energy. So, it's a little bit different than just like lighting it on fire like a you know a gas engine for example. Uh but what's fascinating about Bloom Energy is they've had really bad margins and because of this data center boom their margins are blowing up and when you look at their income statement it's really good right now. Now it didn't used to be. They had negative margins in 21, 22, 23, 24, 25. You get the idea. But now look at this. Their revenue has 2.65xed to over a billion. Their gross profit is sitting at about 33 to 35ish%. They're they've literally got gross margins on their product that are like 37ish%. And then of course you've got like install and some of these other lower margin things. uh they bring about 18.5% to the bottom line now and in their earnings call they're guiding about 21% that they can bring to the bottom line and about 34% that they can bring to the top. Now why does 34% on gross margin matter for the full year? Well, because that's really similar to Apple, which is kind of exciting because you know Apple's a pretty high margin business. We know their stuff isn't exactly the cheap for a pretty penny, but if you go to the Apple financial statements, you'll see that their products also sell for about a 37% gross margin. Now, the thing that's different about Apple that gives Apple a big premium is they sell services at about a 70 to 75% gross margin that Bloom Energy doesn't. So the Apple products that are selling for about 37% margin. So you know you sell $100 worth of stuff, $37 goes into the business that they can then spend on research and GNA or advertising or whatever. Then they pay taxes on it. Then they get their net right. They got $37 billion $37 out of 100 left. That is great because it doesn't just give you the $37. It leads more people to sign up for subscriptions to iCloud or, you know, whatever the the life software that they have for music or the subscriptions for any of their other products, storage included. That's a big W for Apple because it's really high margin. Bloom, on the other hand, you have to think of it as just mostly the vast majority of it being the higher gross margin manufacturing side. The reason that's important is because it caps their net. We're really not expecting to see the net income for Bloom to really ever go beyond 25%. Because they don't have that service aside. They're still making things that cost a lot of money. And these fuel cells are great because you could stand them up in 3 to 4 months whereas, you know, a natural gas facility at a data center might take you somewhere around 3 to four years to stand up. So, there's been this huge boom in let's just use fuel cells to stand up our data centers so we could get up and running and lower our time to revenue on data centers, which is really important because guess the biggest risk for Bloom Energy, their main customer. So, this is customer concentration risk, which uh I think is a really big red flag. That's not to say I'm bearish on the company. We'll talk about a price target in just a moment, but they have got serious revenue concentration. 44% of their Q1 or their last quarter's revenue came from Oracle. And in the last 6 months, 73% came from Oracle. Oracle is, you know, the dirty sort of data center play whose credit default swaps continue to skyrocket because people think they're taking on so much debt. There's a high risk of default. Oracle stock has not exactly been doing them any favors either. If you look at Oracle stock peak to where it is now at 143 divided by 351, which is eerily the same almost the same top that you had um in in the mid 350s range over here for Bloom Energy. That's down nearly 60%. Uh and it's mostly because of the debt they're taking on. Well, who's picking up that debt? It's Bloom Energy, which is now getting a big momentum boost because of Nancy Pelosi. Intraday. It's up like 11% just intraday on this Nancy Pelosi disclosure riding right here at my 206 line which is a fib uh retracement line. Uh and maybe we'll be able to sustain that and break back up. But you could see since uh June after the Google and SpaceX suckening the stock has been falling. Why? It could be visibility into growth. And that's always what's really important about these companies is we try to forecast growth. See, Apple's growth isn't that high, but it's stable. Apple's growth is like 9% stable. And that means they're trading for about a 3.7 peg right now. In my opinion, Apple's actually about 40% overvalued right now because I like to combine, you know, 35 PE ratio divided by the growth and go, I don't want to pay that much for that growth. Now, there's hope that the CEO is going to help transition the company to more products and more AI revenues, but a lot of that hope is already priced in now, right? Bloom Energy, on the other hand, let's look at the forecast for Bloom Energy. So, if I want to go really aggressive on the upside and I give them a really juicy like closer to software level price to earnings growth level, I could take their forecast earnings per share of $2.55, give it a multiple of 2.4 4 times 50% growth, I get a 306 price target. But the problem is the growth that's going up to 50% is going to taper off, especially as Oracle buys fewer of these in the longer term, it's expected in four years, three and four years to taper down to 25%. And so if I run this at just 25% growth times a 24 multiple times their earnings per share today, my fair value today is actually 153. So at 205, you know, we're we're we're closer to this, but like what's my upside, right? My upside is expecting that this can keep booming and growing forever, but I'm really reliant on Oracle. So what that means is I need to expand to different customers. I need to sell to Oracle more. I don't want to bet on Oracle. Uh or I need my margins to go up. Margins, they're good, but we're already seeing some of the pressure here, right? revenue is up 2.6 times and product costs are up 2.9x. So costs are up higher than revenue. And they say part of that is because they had to pay an increase in stockbased compensation on their sales, which to me suggests that like their salespeople are grinding really hard to get those sales and contracts signed. And if I got to pay more than I'm able to increase the prices or revenue, then it just sort of makes me question like how long and sustainable is that revenue? So, I'm not saying this is a bad deal. I'm saying there's concentration risk. Uh there's a lot of momentum in it and the company is growing margins. I got to give them that. They do acknowledge that margin swings a lot. They say it over here. Hey, we've been negative. We went public eight years ago. In between that time, we've swung from negative to positive. There's so much going on uh in terms of changing, but we're really bullish on our total addressable market. We think there are massive tailwinds. we're going to be able to increase market share, get more customers. You know, maybe Oracle is just the start. They also have a related party that buys their own products. This is a fund that they basically operate in partnership with Brookfield Asset Management. And so, in some of their concentration risks, you'll actually see, hey, some of our sales went to a related party entity. That's their AI fund. And their AI fund naturally buys Bloom Energy products. But again in the last quarter that represented 21% of their revenue. So their own sort of circular financing was 21% of their revenue. Oracle was 44% in the last quarter. The quarter before that Oracle was even more. Right? So if you lose the circular part or you lose Oracle you lose a lot of that growth momentum that we're seeing. Now hopefully you could just land new customers. But that's the bet that you're making on this income statement. Now cash flow looks good. Cash flow yield a little low though. Okay. We've got about a 1% less than 1% cash flow yield. Uh you've got Palunteer is also about a 1% cash flow yield. Very different from a software stock that is going to be trading at uh you know like a 10% cash flow yield. An example of which might be like Salesforce. Salesforce was one of the buy alerts that we sent at about $163 per share. Remember you could always be part of that over at the meet Kevin membership. You get all the courses, every trade alert, every private liveream, all the alpha, the fundamental analysis, the technical analysis we do. So stuff like this on a daily basis in our course member liveream. Join us. Use coupon code J-Hole. Tax professional say this could be a tax write off as well. And uh use that coupon code before it expires on August uh 27th. So uh let's just continue and uh look at a little bit of their balance sheet. So their balance sheet is decent. We've got $2.6 billion in cash and I've got $800 million in bills to pay. So, I'm pretty decent on the balance sheet. I do have 2.4 in long-term, though, I will say those long-terms are mostly uh convertible liabilities for 2030 that have a 0% coupon. So, it's not like they're dying or drowning in debt here when they got a 0% loan. Basically, it's pretty good. So, there's a lot to be excited about when it comes to Bloom Energy. And I get it. I get the momentum. I think the technology is brilliant. I think it's really, really smart. uh but I do think there are some risk factors and so our stock AI tool uh which basically tries to use my brain and tune algorithms in combination with artificial intelligence gives you a couple forecasts. We'll look at both Apple and we'll look at Bloom Energy. So, Apple is very interesting because I calculated before I looked before I looked at the stock AI tab, I calculated um how much do I think Apple is worth and I run their peg at what I think a reasonable peg is like a 2 4 22 somewhere in there and I think Apple is overvalued to the tune of 40% was the estimate I came up with. My stock AI tool at mekevin.com shows me at a 45% downside for Apple. So, not really excited here just because so much hope is priced in. Maybe that growth rate will skyrocket though. And if the growth rate for Apple skyrockets on new products and foldable phone, then you could justify a higher fair value, a higher terminal fair value for this company. But we're really relying on growth and we're already we're not getting Apple for a discount to justify uh you know hedging against that growth right now. If I look at Bloom Energy, I sit at 124 with this target on stocki. Why? The reason we sit lower there is because the examples I gave you on the income statement were the more aggressive style pegs. I think 306 to 153 requires a higher net margin that this company is not going to achieve. So, more realistically, you're probably somewhere between, depending on what growth ratio you use, between 90 bucks to 178, which means for me, this is more of a short-term trade than it is a fundamental hedged buy at this point. Could be a momentum play, but that's my take on Bloom and Apple. Make sure to join us over at mekevin.com.

另一方面,Bloom Energy,我们来看看对Bloom Energy的预测。所以,如果我想在上涨方面非常激进,给他们一个非常高的、接近软件水平的市盈率增长倍数,我可以拿他们预测的每股收益2.55美元,乘以2.4倍(即24倍)的50%增长,得到306的目标价。但问题是,高达50%的增长将会逐渐放缓,尤其是随着Oracle长期购买减少,预计在四年内,第三和第四年将放缓至25%。所以,如果我仅以25%的增长乘以24倍再乘以他们当前的每股收益,我今天的公允价值实际上是153。所以在205,你知道,我们更接近这个,但我的上行空间是什么,对吧?我的上行空间是期望这能永远繁荣增长,但我真的很依赖Oracle。所以这意味着我需要扩展到不同的客户。我需要向Oracle销售更多。我不想押注Oracle。或者我需要提高利润率。利润率不错,但我们已经看到一些压力,对吧?收入增长了2.6倍,产品成本增长了2.9倍。所以成本增长高于收入。他们说部分原因是他们不得不增加销售人员的股票薪酬,这在我看来表明他们的销售人员非常努力地争取这些销售和合同签署。如果我必须支付超过我提高价格或收入的能力,那么这让我质疑这种收入的可持续性有多久。所以,我不是说这是一笔糟糕的交易。我是说存在集中风险。有很多动能,公司正在增长利润率。我必须承认这一点。他们确实承认利润率波动很大。他们在这里说。嘿,我们一直是负的。我们八年前上市。在那段时间里,我们从负到正波动。有很多变化,但我们非常看好我们的总可寻址市场。我们认为有巨大的顺风。我们将能够增加市场份额,获得更多客户。你知道,也许Oracle只是开始。他们还有一个关联方购买他们自己的产品。这是一个他们基本上与Brookfield Asset Management合作运营的基金。所以,在他们的一些集中风险中,你实际上会看到,嘿,我们的一些销售去了一个关联方实体。那是他们的人工智能基金。他们的人工智能基金自然购买Bloom Energy的产品。但同样,上个季度这占他们收入的21%。所以他们自己的循环融资占收入的21%。上个季度Oracle占44%。再上个季度Oracle更多,对吧?所以如果你失去循环部分或失去Oracle,你就会失去我们看到的大量增长动能。现在希望你能获得新客户。但这就是你在损益表上下的赌注。现在现金流看起来不错。但现金流收益率有点低。好的。我们大约有1%,不到1%的现金流收益率。Palantir也大约是1%的现金流收益率。这与软件股非常不同,软件股将以10%的现金流收益率交易。一个例子可能是Salesforce。Salesforce是我们发送的买入提醒之一,价格约为每股163美元。记住,你可以在meet Kevin会员中参与。你获得所有课程、每笔交易提醒、每场私人直播、所有alpha、基本面分析、技术分析。所以像这样的东西每天在我们的课程会员直播中。加入我们。使用优惠券代码J-Hole。税务专业人士说这也可能是税收减免。并在8月27日到期前使用该优惠券代码。所以让我们继续看看他们的资产负债表。他们的资产负债表不错。我们有26亿美元现金,我有8亿美元的账单要付。所以,资产负债表相当不错。我确实有2.4的长期债务,但我要说这些长期债务主要是2030年的可转换负债,票息为0%。所以,当他们获得0%贷款时,并不是说他们濒临死亡或债务缠身。基本上,相当不错。所以,关于Bloom Energy有很多令人兴奋的地方。我理解。我理解这种动能。我认为技术很出色。我认为它非常非常聪明。但我确实认为存在一些风险因素,所以我们的股票AI工具,基本上试图结合我的大脑和调整算法与人工智能,给你几个预测。我们将看看Apple和Bloom Energy。所以,Apple非常有趣,因为我在看股票AI标签之前计算了,我认为Apple值多少,我以我认为合理的市盈率增长倍数运行,比如2.4倍22倍左右,我认为Apple被高估了40%,这是我得出的估计。我的股票AI工具在mekevin.com显示Apple有45%的下行空间。所以,不太兴奋,只是因为定价了太多希望。也许增长率会飙升。如果Apple的增长率因新产品和折叠手机而飙升,那么你可以证明更高的公允价值,更高的终值公允价值。但我们真的很依赖增长,而且我们并没有以折扣价获得Apple来证明对冲这种增长是合理的。如果我看Bloom Energy,我在stocki上以124的目标价。为什么我们更低?因为我在损益表上给出的例子是更激进的市盈率增长倍数。我认为306到153需要更高的净利率,这家公司无法实现。所以,更现实的是,你可能在两者之间,取决于你使用的增长比率,在90美元到178美元之间,这意味着对我来说,这更像是一个短期交易,而不是一个基本面对冲买入。可能是一个动能交易,但这是我对Bloom和Apple的看法。确保加入我们在mekevin.com。

Bloom Energy, on the other hand, let's look at the forecast for Bloom Energy. So, if I want to go really aggressive on the upside and I give them a really juicy like closer to software level price to earnings growth level, I could take their forecast earnings per share of $2.55, give it a multiple of 2.4 4 times 50% growth, I get a 306 price target. But the problem is the growth that's going up to 50% is going to taper off, especially as Oracle buys fewer of these in the longer term, it's expected in four years, three and four years to taper down to 25%. And so if I run this at just 25% growth times a 24 multiple times their earnings per share today, my fair value today is actually 153. So at 205, you know, we're we're we're closer to this, but like what's my upside, right? My upside is expecting that this can keep booming and growing forever, but I'm really reliant on Oracle. So what that means is I need to expand to different customers. I need to sell to Oracle more. I don't want to bet on Oracle. Uh or I need my margins to go up. Margins, they're good, but we're already seeing some of the pressure here, right? revenue is up 2.6 times and product costs are up 2.9x. So costs are up higher than revenue. And they say part of that is because they had to pay an increase in stockbased compensation on their sales, which to me suggests that like their salespeople are grinding really hard to get those sales and contracts signed. And if I got to pay more than I'm able to increase the prices or revenue, then it just sort of makes me question like how long and sustainable is that revenue? So, I'm not saying this is a bad deal. I'm saying there's concentration risk. Uh there's a lot of momentum in it and the company is growing margins. I got to give them that. They do acknowledge that margin swings a lot. They say it over here. Hey, we've been negative. We went public eight years ago. In between that time, we've swung from negative to positive. There's so much going on uh in terms of changing, but we're really bullish on our total addressable market. We think there are massive tailwinds. we're going to be able to increase market share, get more customers. You know, maybe Oracle is just the start. They also have a related party that buys their own products. This is a fund that they basically operate in partnership with Brookfield Asset Management. And so, in some of their concentration risks, you'll actually see, hey, some of our sales went to a related party entity. That's their AI fund. And their AI fund naturally buys Bloom Energy products. But again in the last quarter that represented 21% of their revenue. So their own sort of circular financing was 21% of their revenue. Oracle was 44% in the last quarter. The quarter before that Oracle was even more. Right? So if you lose the circular part or you lose Oracle you lose a lot of that growth momentum that we're seeing. Now hopefully you could just land new customers. But that's the bet that you're making on this income statement. Now cash flow looks good. Cash flow yield a little low though. Okay. We've got about a 1% less than 1% cash flow yield. Uh you've got Palunteer is also about a 1% cash flow yield. Very different from a software stock that is going to be trading at uh you know like a 10% cash flow yield. An example of which might be like Salesforce. Salesforce was one of the buy alerts that we sent at about $163 per share. Remember you could always be part of that over at the meet Kevin membership. You get all the courses, every trade alert, every private liveream, all the alpha, the fundamental analysis, the technical analysis we do. So stuff like this on a daily basis in our course member liveream. Join us. Use coupon code J-Hole. Tax professional say this could be a tax write off as well. And uh use that coupon code before it expires on August uh 27th. So uh let's just continue and uh look at a little bit of their balance sheet. So their balance sheet is decent. We've got $2.6 billion in cash and I've got $800 million in bills to pay. So, I'm pretty decent on the balance sheet. I do have 2.4 in long-term, though, I will say those long-terms are mostly uh convertible liabilities for 2030 that have a 0% coupon. So, it's not like they're dying or drowning in debt here when they got a 0% loan. Basically, it's pretty good. So, there's a lot to be excited about when it comes to Bloom Energy. And I get it. I get the momentum. I think the technology is brilliant. I think it's really, really smart. uh but I do think there are some risk factors and so our stock AI tool uh which basically tries to use my brain and tune algorithms in combination with artificial intelligence gives you a couple forecasts. We'll look at both Apple and we'll look at Bloom Energy. So, Apple is very interesting because I calculated before I looked before I looked at the stock AI tab, I calculated um how much do I think Apple is worth and I run their peg at what I think a reasonable peg is like a 2 4 22 somewhere in there and I think Apple is overvalued to the tune of 40% was the estimate I came up with. My stock AI tool at mekevin.com shows me at a 45% downside for Apple. So, not really excited here just because so much hope is priced in. Maybe that growth rate will skyrocket though. And if the growth rate for Apple skyrockets on new products and foldable phone, then you could justify a higher fair value, a higher terminal fair value for this company. But we're really relying on growth and we're already we're not getting Apple for a discount to justify uh you know hedging against that growth right now. If I look at Bloom Energy, I sit at 124 with this target on stocki. Why? The reason we sit lower there is because the examples I gave you on the income statement were the more aggressive style pegs. I think 306 to 153 requires a higher net margin that this company is not going to achieve. So, more realistically, you're probably somewhere between, depending on what growth ratio you use, between 90 bucks to 178, which means for me, this is more of a short-term trade than it is a fundamental hedged buy at this point. Could be a momentum play, but that's my take on Bloom and Apple. Make sure to join us over at mekevin.com.

所以他们的资产负债表不错。我们有26亿美元现金,有8亿美元的应付账款。所以,资产负债表相当不错。不过我有2.4亿美元的长期债务,但我要说这些长期债务主要是2030年到期的可转换负债,票息为0%。所以,当他们获得0%的贷款时,并不是说他们濒临死亡或深陷债务。基本上,相当不错。

So their balance sheet is decent. We've got $2.6 billion in cash and I've got $800 million in bills to pay. So, I'm pretty decent on the balance sheet. I do have 2.4 in long-term, though, I will say those long-terms are mostly uh convertible liabilities for 2030 that have a 0% coupon. So, it's not like they're dying or drowning in debt here when they got a 0% loan. Basically, it's pretty good.

如果我看Bloom Energy,我在stocki上的目标价是124。为什么?我们之所以更低,是因为我在损益表上给出的例子是更激进的市盈率与盈利增长比率。我认为306到153需要更高的净利率,而这家公司不会达到。所以,更现实的是,你可能在某个区间,取决于你使用的增长率,在90美元到178美元之间,这意味着对我来说,这更像是一个短期交易,而不是一个基本面对冲的买入。可能是一个动量游戏,但这就是我对Bloom和苹果的看法。

If I look at Bloom Energy, I sit at 124 with this target on stocki. Why? The reason we sit lower there is because the examples I gave you on the income statement were the more aggressive style pegs. I think 306 to 153 requires a higher net margin that this company is not going to achieve. So, more realistically, you're probably somewhere between, depending on what growth ratio you use, between 90 bucks to 178, which means for me, this is more of a short-term trade than it is a fundamental hedged buy at this point. Could be a momentum play, but that's my take on Bloom and Apple.

所以这并不会使Bloom Energy成为一家糟糕的公司。这是一个集中风险。但这并不意味着有集中风险的公司就是糟糕的。就像,只是交易对手是谁?所以在这种情况下,交易对手是Oracle,其信用违约互换正在飙升。

So that doesn't make Bloom Energy a bad company. It's a concentrated risk. Now that doesn't mean companies with concentrated risk are bad. Like it's just who's the counterparty? So in this case the counterparty is Oracle which credit default swaps are skyrocketing on.

我们真的希望看到扩展到其他数据中心,而不仅仅是Oracle。

We really want to see expansion to other data centers rather than just Oracle.

所以,这取决于你想把赌注押在哪里。只要你下了这个赌注并且知道这一点,那么你就可以监控事情如何演变。利润率是否在增加?客户集中度是否在下降,从而客户基础在扩大?当然,如果整个人工智能热潮继续下去,我们扩大那个平台期,那也会有帮助。这对Bloom Energy来说相当关键,也是它的一个底线。

So, it just depends on kind of where you want to place that bet. And then as long as you place that bet and know that, then you can kind of monitor how things are evolving. Is margin increasing? Uh, and is that customer concentration uh declining to where they're broadening out and then of course it would help if the entire artificial intelligence boom kind of keeps going, we expand that plateau. That's pretty critical for uh Bloom Energy and sort of a bottom line on it.

关于Bloom的底线结论,这里的大赌注是他们能否获得更多客户,以及能否更快地提高利润率?这才是Bloom的真正赌注。我的看法是,你确实希望看到客户和利润率两方面的扩张都在发生。

for a bottom line takeaway on Bloom, the big play here is can they get more customers and can they grow fast their margins faster? That's the real play on Bloom. My take uh is that you really want to see expansion not only to customers but margins both happening.

这可能不仅依赖于人工智能应用范围的扩展,无论是在医疗保健、机器人、太空,还是AGI(我不相信AGI,但无所谓)。我们真正希望看到的是那个热潮的扩展,就像我们在内存周期中讨论的那样,在最终衰退之前扩大数据中心平台期。理想情况下,你会看到更多人工智能数据中心增长的S曲线,燃料电池真正成为不仅是Oracle购买的核心产品,也是其他数据中心的核心产品。

What that's probably going to rely on is not just an expansion of what artificial intelligence is used for, whether it's in healthcare, robotics, you know, space, you know, whatever, AGI, which, you know, I don't believe in AGI, but whatever. Um, what we really want to see is an expansion of that boom, kind of like what we talked about in that memory cycle where you can expand out that data center plateau before you kind of get that eventual decline. Ideally, you get some more scurves of AI data center growth and you really get fuel cells becoming sort of a core product for not just Oracle uh that they purchase but also other data centers.

呃,快速跟进一下。我想对Bloom Energy的事情做一个快速的跟进,只是为了给出一点底线。

Uh, quick, uh, followup. I want to do a quick followup on the, uh, uh, Bloom Energy thing just to give a little bit of a of a bottom line on this.

所以,我们得到了那个。然后我想跟进并提醒一下,或者给出一个底线,因为我觉得我对Bloom没有一个很好的底线。关于Bloom的底线结论,这里的大赌注是他们能否获得更多客户,以及能否更快地提高利润率?这才是Bloom的真正赌注。我的看法是,你确实希望看到客户和利润率两方面的扩张都在发生。

So, we got that. And then I want to follow up and just remind uh or put like a bottom line because I feel like I didn't like have a really good bottom line on on Bloom. So, for a bottom line takeaway on Bloom, the big play here is can they get more customers and can they grow fast their margins faster? That's the real play on Bloom. My take uh is that you really want to see expansion not only to customers but margins both happening.

Bloom Energy的南希·佩洛西交易已经在消退。

Bloom Energy Nancy Pelosi trade already fading.

以上 30 段为这条视频中谈及 $BE 的全部内容。逐字对不上字幕的段落不会收录。

他说在等什么

他自己说在等的东西,一段话一条记录。同一件事说过几次就出现几次,我们不合并,也不判断它有没有兑现。

customer concentration and margin trends
暂无中文转述,仅英文原句可核对。
他没有说用什么来检验

这个频道对 $BE 的历次判断

Meet Kevin 在这只股票上共 2 条判断,这里只列相邻的几条。

2026-08-24
南希·佩洛西的定期交易报告,这是一种花哨的说法,说她逢低买入,可能是她丈夫,但这不重要,因为他们刚刚花费了数百万美元购买Bloom Energy和Intel。
原话 00:07 ›
2026-08-24本条
人们也对Bloom Energy感到非常非常兴奋。这家公司确实已经回落了很多,而且他们有非常大的涡轮机。我开玩笑的。他们没有涡轮机。呃,他们是一家燃料电池公司,而且他们在那些燃料电池上有相当不错的定价权,因为你可以在大约三到四个月内安装好它们,比安装天然气涡轮机快得多。而且我并不完全理解它是如何工作的,但我认为你可以基本上通过化学方式将天然气转化为能源,而不只是点燃它,这非常吸引人。呃,这看起来有点酷。总之,那一直是数据中心的一个重要组成部分,因为嘿,我可以更快地建立数据中心。你知道,建造你自己的天然气设施需要数年时间,更不用说获得许可了。这太疯狂了。
看完整历史 ›
这一页只记录说话人自己说过的话,不做判断、不下结论。研究辅助,非投资建议。
TICKERRECEIPTS