TSLA短期看空,因事件令人失望;长期看多,取决于更快的边缘映射执行。
逐段跳播
在昨天的活动之后,特斯拉会有一些回吐。你知道,虽然长期来看,我认为有一些理由可以乐观。
you are going to get some give back on Tesla after the um event yesterday. Uh you know although long-term I think uh uh it's uh you know there's some reasons to be optimistic.
所以,好吧,我2030年的估计并不真正包括机器人出租车。我把它视为一个额外的好处。但是,我要说的是,说“忘掉它”太激进了。这是我的锦上添花的论点。好吧,所以我称机器人出租车为锦上添花。
我在承销特斯拉时假设机器人出租车根本不起作用。这是一款很棒的消费级汽车,人们购买它并配备全自动驾驶,他们非常喜欢它,我们只是回到销售更多特斯拉的状态。
So okay, my 2030 estimates don't really include robo taxi. I see it as a bonus. Um, but I will say it's way too aggressive to say forget about it. This is my icing on the cake thesis. Okay, so I call robo taxis icing on the cake. I underwrite Tesla as if robo taxis just don't work. That this is a great consumer car that people buy and they get full self-driving with and they freaking love it and we just get back to selling more Teslas.
我要说的是,Cyber Cab unboxed的潜力更大。所以我认为在2030年将其承销为零太激进了。我认为你不能为机器人出租车承销大量收入,但我愿意,也许以20%的利润率,给他们Uber所做的一小部分。
Um, I will say the Cyber Cab unboxed has more potential than that. And so I do think it's too aggressive to underwrite it for 2030 at zero. I don't think you can underwrite a lot of revenue for robo taxis, but I will at you know maybe a 20% margin uh give them a fraction of uh what Uber does.
所以,我对特斯拉的预测,如果我达到225的市盈率,那就是250或555美元,假设我们能交付400万辆汽车,并且Optimus也有50亿。
So, my forecast on Tesla, if I get to a 225 peg, uh, is 250 or $555 assuming we can get four million vehicles delivered and we have Optimus at five billion as well.
是的。是的,那很合理。四年内销售20万台特斯拉机器人。是的。是的,我可以接受。
Yeah. Yeah, that's reasonable. 200,000 sales of the Tesla bot in four years. Yeah. Yeah, I I could go with that.
半挂卡车的营业收入。这可能也有点激进。公平地说,这可能非常高。半挂卡车失败可能会抵消所有机器人和机器人出租车的收入,对吧?我不认为它会失败,但值得关注FSD订阅的增长。
Semi-truck operating income. That might be a little aggressive too. In fairness, this might be very high. semi-truck failing uh could offset all bot and um robo rev, right? I don't think it's going to fail, but it's it's worth paying attention to that growth in FSD subscriptions.
这使我们的估值上调了约50美元。这使我对特斯拉的估值上调了约50美元。如果我现在进去砍掉半挂卡车业务,我就会再次失去那50美元。所以,你需要那种执行力。但这让你大致了解数字可能如何受到影响。我认为这是一个合理的观点。
That brings us up about 50 bucks. That brings my estimates up about 50 bucks for Tesla. again. If I if I now go in here and I kill the semi-truck, right, I go kill the semi-truck, I lose that 50 bucks again. So, you need that execution. But that gives you an idea of of roughly how the numbers could be affected. I think that's a reasonable point of view.
特斯拉目前下跌约5%。这实际上只是回吐了昨日的涨幅。在像昨天那样的7%或9%的涨幅之后,我们预计会有一些回吐。非常正常。这正是我们今天早上在alpha报告中说的。人们认为这很疯狂,因为昨天表现很好。
但并非总是完美的。他们甚至不在乎那个,但一些回吐是完全预期的,尤其是在特斯拉,因为特斯拉的活动在短期内让股市失望,但我实际上认为长期来看,你可以承保以前无法承保的积极因素。
So uh Tesla's down about 5% at the moment. It's really just giving back yesterday's move. We expect some give back after you have a seven or 9% day like you did yesterday on Palunteer. Super normal. It's exactly what we said in the alpha report this morning. And people think this is crazy because yesterday was great. It's not always perfect. They don't even fair about that, you know, but like some give back is totally expected, especially on Tesla because the Tesla event was a disappointment for the stock market in the short term, but I actually think longer term you can underwrite positivity that you couldn't underwrite
尤其是在特斯拉,因为特斯拉的活动在短期内让股市失望,但我实际上认为长期来看,你可以承保以前无法承保的积极因素。
especially on Tesla because the Tesla event was a disappointment for the stock market in the short term, but I actually think longer term you can underwrite positivity that you couldn't underwrite before.
我确实担心其中一些数字可能仍然过于乐观,而且我认为我的数字已经非常保守了。
I do worry that some of those numbers could be just too optimistic still and I think my numbers are very reserved already.
这不是软件日。显然,这是硬件日,当然,特斯拉除外。
It's not a software day. It's a hardware day, apparently, with the exception, of course, of Tesla.
好的,让我们快速记一下特斯拉,把这些想法整理在一起。我们也有一些来自埃隆的笔记。所以,让我们也拉取那些,因为埃隆补充了一点。
Okay, let's do that quick note on Tesla and put these thoughts together here. And we also have some notes out of Elon now. So, let's pull those as well because Elon added a little bit.
埃隆说,让我们看看,Cybercab不使用稀土金属,但保持相同的续航里程。极难实现。这也是看涨的。那很好,因为你试图避免这种依赖中国电动汽车的必要性。我们昨天谈到了这些。为超级计算机团队招聘。
好的。所以,在我们从活动中看到的内容之后,没有太多其他内容。我们得到的最大的事情是稀土宣传。
Elon said, let's see, Cyber Cab. Cybercab uses no rare earth metals but maintains the same range. Extremely hard to achieve. That's bullish, too. That's great because you're trying to avoid this uh how would you put it necessity of relying on China electric brakes. We talked about those yesterday. Hiring for the supercomput teams. Okay. So, nothing much else after what we saw from the event. We've got the biggest thing there was the rare earth pitch.
你知道什么会很有趣,那就是看看Waymo的爬坡,也许绘制Waymo的爬坡图。因为让我们看看。我打算尝试调出数据。我打算尝试获取Waymo的增长率,然后我想将其与特斯拉进行比较,特斯拉没有太多增长率,因为我们大多在20到40辆车之间。
我的意思是也许现在我们在60辆车左右,但我们仍然低于100辆。有点像是小数字定律,百分比看起来非常大,但显然车队规模很小,但我很好奇需要多长时间,我认为技术会加速爬坡,但我很好奇Waymo已经在这里烹饪了多少年,那会很有趣,就像车队规模一样,这是一个10年的项目吗?
You know what would be interesting would be seeing kind of Whimo's ramp and maybe charting Whimo's ramp. Uh because let's see here. Uh uh okay that I'm going to try to pull up the data on. I'm going to try to get Whimo's growth rate and then I want to try to compare that to like well Tesla's there's not much of a growth rate because we've mostly been at you know somewhere between 20 to 40 cars. I mean maybe now we're at like 60 cars but we're still under a hundred. kind of have like the law of small numbers thing going on where percentage-wise those gains look really really big but obviously small fleet size but I'm curious how long and I think technology will accelerate the ramp but I'm curious how long Whimo you know how many years have they really been cooking here that would be interesting like just fleet size like is this been a 10-year project
但是,所以,Waymo的车队规模数字,他们实际上真的开始推动,虽然不稳定。2024年7月,他们有700辆车。2025年12月,他们达到2500辆车。现在他们在5月大约有3791辆车。
而且他们正在从那里扩张。所以,如果我据此制作一个快速增长图表,我不会感到惊讶如果埃隆能比他们更快。但是,让我们把它画出来,特别是因为你能够更便宜地扩展这些。
But uh so okay, so the numbers for Whimo for fleet size, they actually really started pushing ah it's lumpy though. July of 2024, they had 700 vehicles. December of 2025, they got to 2500 vehicles. and now they're at about 3791 vehicles in May. Uh, and they're, you know, they're expanding from there. So, if I make a quick growth chart out of that, I I wouldn't be surprised if Elon can move faster than them. Uh, but let's cheat it out, especially since you're able to to ramp these much uh more inexpensively.
12月25日,然后我们得到2026年5月。好的。所以,既然我有数据,我们就要制作这个图表。700、2500、3791的爬坡。所以,这是Waymo的爬坡表。Waymo与特斯拉的爬坡对比。
你知道,我们可以争论我们可能,你知道,我们怎么说?我们可能在2025年夏天,你知道,称之为20,然后我就称之为7月25日,你知道,随便。然后也许在这里我们在2025年9月,我们可能在2026年,你知道,车队规模被授权要大得多,但如果我们加上40辆Cybercab,你知道,我们可能会称之为正负100现在。
所以再次,小数字定律在这种情况下会使这有点误导。但让我们尝试在相同的时间框架内绘制这个。看看那是什么样子。两条线。那没用,是吗?所以这是特斯拉。哦,因为它是正确的,因为它们不是相对的。
你不能把20和3000放在一起绘制。当然,那没问题。所以,这实际上是Waymo的轨迹。希望我们有更多数据点回到2024年7月。它确实应该,但它实际上没有显示全部。愚蠢的东西。应该真的给我,你知道吗?
让我们假设我们要在这里插值。我们会填补那个。好了。我们需要填一个数字来完成图表。所以,我们填补1500。然后,让我们继续在这里填补。我们就到40和60,类似那样,对吧?所以,我们将这些斜体数字称为插值图表。
哦,大词。大词,凯文。是的,你知道,这种曲棍球棒曲线将是经典的埃隆,我认为他将能够更快地制造。
December 25 and then we get May of 26. Okay. So, we're just gonna make this graph now that I have the data. 700 2500 3791 ramp. Uh, so this is the ramp sheet for Whimo. Whimo versus, you know, Tesla ramp. You know, we could argue that we're probably, you know, what would what would we say here? We're probably, you know, summer 2025, you know, call it 20 and then I'll just call it like July 25, you know, whatever. And then maybe over here we are at you know September 2025 we're maybe at sorry 2026 you know fleet size is authorized to be a lot larger but if we add the 40 cyber cabs you know we'll probably call it plus or minus 100 right now. So again, the law of small numbers in this case will make this a little bit more misleading. But let's try to chart this just over the same time frame here. See what that looks like. Two lines. That's not useful, is it? So this is Tesla. Oh, because it's right because they're not relative to each other. You can't chart 20 next to 3,000. Of course, that's fine. So, this is really Whimo, Whimo's trajectory. Wish we had more data points here going back to July of 2024. It really should, but it doesn't actually show it all the way. Stupid thing. Should really give me, you know what? Let's just assume we're going to interpolate here. We'll fill that in. There we go. We need to fill in a number to actually complete the graph. So, we're filling in 1500. Then, let's go ahead and fill in here. And we'll just go to like 40 and 60, something like that, right? And so, we'll call these italicized numbers the interpolated graph. Oo, big words. Big words, Kevin. Uh, yeah, it's, you know, this hockey sticking is is going to be classic Elon, and I think he'll be able to manufacture a lot faster.
所以,问题不在于制造,问题在于扩展,我所说的映射,我不认为它一定是映射本身。我认为对特斯拉来说,这是一个让我们把所有边缘情况都解决掉的问题。所以,我将称之为边缘情况映射将是拖慢特斯拉最多的部分。
从制造的角度来看,Giga Texas每年可以生产125,000辆这些。如果你全力生产未来两年,你将拥有Waymo 20倍的车,快得感觉就像一夜之间。但限制不是制造,而是边缘情况映射。
所以,我们需要看到他们在圣彼得堡、达拉斯、犹他州等地进行的测试,或者我就说内华达州,因为我们看到内华达州更多,对吧?这些地区需要展示这些Cybercab的初步成功爬坡,然后你可以折现边缘映射风险。
好的,那很快就会变得非常看涨。所以我们有点像处于我们知道他们可以做到的地步,对吧?所以执行风险已经被消除。执行风险消失了。真正的风险现在是边缘映射的速度是下一个风险,可以通过观察这些不同地区的Cybercab来跟踪。
So what and and once the the issue is not manufacturing though the issue is uh scaling the what what I argue the mapping and I don't think it necessarily has to be mapping itself. Uh I think what it is for Tesla is a um let's get every edge case out of this. So, I'm going to call this uh edge case mapping is going to be the part that slows Tesla down the most. On a manufacturing uh point of view, uh Giga Texas can do 125,000 per year of these. Uh if you produced these full steam ahead for the next 2 years, you'd have 20x the cars Whimo does so fast it'll feel like it's overnight. But the limit isn't manufacturing, it's the uh edge case mapping. Uh, so we need to see those, you know, what the the tests they're doing in like St. Pete, Dallas, Utah, or or I I'll just put Nevada because we're seeing Nevada more, right? These areas uh need to show an initial successful ramp of these cyber cabs and uh then you can discount the uh edge mapping risk. Okay, that becomes really bullish fast. So we're kind of like at the point where we know they could pull it off, right? So there's execution risk has been removed. Execution risk is gone. The real risk now is uh speed of edge mapping is the next risk and that can be tracked by looking at these cyber caps in different areas.
对吧?不,没有基于工资增长的工资价格螺旋。工资价格螺旋来自工资增长。我们没有看到爆炸性的工资增长。嗯,所以,是的,那很有趣。嗯,我实际上发现这对特斯拉来说令人兴奋。再次,短期看跌,因为你刚刚经历了一个令人失望的活动,对吧?
Right? No, there's no wage price spiral based on uh uh the wage growth. Wage price spiral comes from wage growth. we're not seeing like explosive wage growth. Um, so yeah, that's that is interesting. Uh, I find that actually exciting for Tesla. Again, short-term bearish though because you're coming off of a disappointing event, right?
该死,今天上涨8%。是的,今天硬件在爆发。好的。嗯。试着想想,你知道,因为他们昨天在活动中确实说了,没有映射。让我调出我昨天的笔记,因为他们说了没有映射。Cybercab crew。
嗯,好的。我们会做的。让我调出这些笔记。我在想是否还有其他内容。有缩短50%的制造线。他们认为他们可以做得更快。他们确实设定了热情。
Damn, Ser 8% today. Uh yeah, you're getting hardware popping off today. Okay. Huh. Trying to think, you know, because they did say at the event yesterday, no mapping. Let me pull up my notes yesterday because they said no mapping. Uh cyber cab crew. Um, okay. We will do. Let me pull up these notes. I'm trying to think if there was anything else. There was the 50% shorter manufacturing line. They think they could do it faster. They did set up enthusiasm.
Cyber Cavs 目前正在运营。我试图找到那个……因为有人说在圣彼得堡看到了他。让我们看看能否在 X 上找到,例如,Cybercab 目击 Cybercab 圣彼得堡,或者我就写佛罗里达。
是的。看这里有人写道,我想我今天在佛罗里达看到了一辆 Cybercab。是的,>> 我想是的。>> 但那辆有方向盘。啊,该死。所以,他们这是验证过程。啊,看看他们是否能把 Cybercab 投放到佛罗里达,而你已经在处理边缘案例测试,或者解决这个问题,因为他们是无人驾驶的。
那太好了。但他们没有。看,这就是我说的边缘案例训练。该死。啊,这就是风险因素,即放缓。所以,无论你在哪里看到它们,这是南佛罗里达。让我们看看这辆是否也有方向盘。兄弟,追上它。别让它跑了。
我们开始吧。那是一个方向盘。那里就是一个方向盘。看那个。啊,所以他们正在招聘。这就是他们如何训练、如何获取数据的方式。所以他们用训练轮来处理边缘场景。是的。有人说工程车辆。是的。
这就是他们正在做的训练。我住在达拉斯,我一直看到它们带着方向盘。是的。这就是训练部分。这就是我所说的边缘案例训练,仅在奥斯汀就花了一年时间。那只是奥斯汀。它劳动密集且耗时一年。
Cyber Cavs are currently operating. We've got I'm trying to find where the because somebody said they saw him in St. Pete. Let's see if we could find just on X, for example. Cybercap spotting cybercab uh St. Pete or I'll just put Florida. Yeah. See here somebody wrote think I saw a cyber cab in Florida today. Yeah, >> I think it is. >> But that one has a steering wheel. Ah. Ah, damn it. Ah. So, they're this is the validating process. Ah, see if they if they could just drop the cyber cabs in Florida and you're uh you know you're already dealing with that edge case testing uh or or resolving that because they're driving driverless. That'd be great. But they're not. See, this is this is the edge case training I'm talking about. Damn it. Ah, that's that's the that's the risk factor is that slowdown. So, wherever you see them, this is South Florida. Let's see if this one has a wheel, too. Bro, catch up to it. Don't let it get away. Here we go. That's a steering wheel. That's a steering wheel right there. Look at that. Ah, so they're hiring. This is how they're training, how they're getting the data. So they deal with the edge scenarios with the training wheel. Yeah. Somebody says engineering vehicles. Yeah. This is this is the training they're doing them. I live in Dallas and I've been seeing them with steering wheels. Yeah. It's that so that's the training part. This is what I call the edge case training and that took a year in Austin alone. That was only Austin. was labor intensive and it took a year.
还有另一个……为什么你必须在里面放音乐?为什么你必须那样做?Penllis 县。我想我现在可以在 Penllis 叫一辆特斯拉 Cybercab。不,你不能。佛罗里达州奥兰多。
好吧。好的。热情比希望少一点。有人说,“呃,在驾驶员需要独立于车辆的保险的州,这如何运作?”我认为他们只是不会去那些有监管问题的州。他们暂时会避开并远离那些地区。那是我的猜测。
And there's another why why do you have to put music in it? Why do you have to do that? Penllis County. I guess I can hail a Tesla cyber cab in Penllis right now. No, you can't. Orlando, Florida. All right. Okay. Enthusiasm a little less than hope though. H somebody says, "Uh, how does it work in states with driver needing insurance separate to the vehicle?" I think they're just not going to go to states where you have, you know, the regulatory concerns. They're just going to stay away and avoid those areas for now. That'd be my guess.
好的。你觉得牛奶还好吗?不管怎样。好的。我们说到哪了?我们将讨论 Teslur,我们将看看边缘映射和特斯拉的预测。呃,我确实认为要解释这一点,我们应该在小白板上画一下,因为我不确定仅仅说边缘映射是否非常容易理解,因为那听起来像映射,对吧?
边缘验证也许是这个词。我称之为边缘映射。我对此没问题。好的。所以如果我们现在画出来,我们会怎么画?我们会说有完整地图,你知道,可能是你的 Whimo。所以我们放 Whimo。呃,然后我们去特斯拉。
然后当然我们有 LAR 和完整地图加上视觉。好的。还有雷达。这些非常非常昂贵。特斯拉是极其便宜的纯视觉。我们知道这一点。但风险因素是边缘映射边缘地图,它极其极其昂贵,而且时间是个问题。好的。
All right. Do you think the milk's still okay? Anyway. All right. So, where were we? We are going to yap about Teslur and we're going to look at uh edge mapping and the forecast for Tesla. Uh, I do think that to explain that we should touch on uh do a little whiteboard on that because I I I don't know that that's super understandable to just say edge mapping because that sounds like mapping, right? Edge validating maybe is the word. I call it edge mapping. I'm okay with that. Okay. So if we now draw this out, how would we draw that? We would say there's full map, you know, probably your your Whimo. So we'll put Whimo. Uh and then we'll go Tesla. And then of course we have LAR and full map uh plus vision. Okay. And then radar as well. And these are pricey pricey pricey. The Tesla is dirt cheap vision only. We know that. But the risk factor is uh the edge mapping edge map which is mega mega pricey and time that's the question. Okay.
好的。好吧,我们开始吧。这是埃隆·马斯克没有出席的 Cybercab 活动之后的早晨,对于特斯拉和 Cybercab,我们必须评估一些看涨和看跌的事情。最重要的是我称之为边缘映射的过程,我认为这将是特斯拉未来前进的关键组成部分。
所以我一直在考虑这个,关于我们昨天听到的活动,听了多次。一个突出的关键是 Cybercab 团队重申他们不进行地图绘制,他们使用纯视觉策略。所以这就是我引入一个概念的地方,或者……
我相信他们在做什么。所以我这样称呼它。我不知道这是否是它的名字,但我认为这正是他们在做的。我认为他们正在做的是基于视觉的边缘映射。这里有一些与 Whimo 的比较,我们必须知道,因为它将影响我们对特斯拉未来目标价和股票的看法,我们稍后也会讨论。
Okay. All right, let's do it. It's the morning after the Cyber Cab event that Elon Musk did not show up to and there are some bullish and some bearish things that we have to evaluate for Tesla and the Cyber Cap. most importantly this process that I call edge mapping and I think that's going to be the critical component going forward for Tesla. So I was thinking about this a little bit with the event we heard yesterday listened to yesterday listened to it multiple times. A key that stood out to me was the reiteration by the cyber cab crew that they do not map that they use a vision-basedonly strategy. And so this is where I'm introducing a concept or or uh what what I believe what they're doing. So I'm calling it this. I don't know if this is what it's called but I think this is exactly what they're doing. I think what they're doing is their vision-based edge mapping. And there are some comparisons to Whimo here that we have to know because it's going to factor into what we think about a Tesla future price target and the stock, which we'll also talk about in just a moment.
所以,让我们想想这个。Whimo 被认为在车辆上要贵得多,这是埃隆·马斯克的公平评估。我们认为特斯拉 Cybercab 的 unbox 过程,坦率地说,它是一辆没有装饰的车,没有玻璃车顶,没有后座,没有手套箱,它是一个显示器,平坦的仪表板,像警车后部那样的塑料外壳,你可以用水冲洗。
非常适合车队。就像,你知道,相当没有装饰。所以,就直接这么说吧。而 unboxed 制造过程据称将整体装配线长度减少 50%,然后使其更快。我们不知道快多少。我们知道安装产能约为每年 125,000 辆来制造 Cybercab。
那是特斯拉给我们的估计,这很好,稍后这将很重要。所以,我们确实预计 Cybercab 会便宜得多。所以,我放了 1 美元符号。所以,这有点像,你知道,便宜的快餐与,你知道,三美元的套餐,或者甚至四美元的套餐,对吧?
呃,显然,Whimo 使用一整套传感器,LAR、视觉、雷达,以及对其运营区域的完整地图。另一方面,特斯拉不使用那种策略。他们使用纯视觉策略,但这给特斯拉带来了一个大问题,那就是昂贵的 3 美元符号昂贵,不是车贵,而是昂贵的人工边缘映射。
So, uh, let's let's think about this. Whimo is deemed to be way more expensive for the vehicle, which is a fair assessment by Elon Musk. We think the unbox process for the Tesla Cyber Cabin, frankly, it's a no frrills car, no glass roof on the inside, no back seat, no glove box, it's a monitor, flat dash panel, plastic like back of cop car kind of shell in the back you could hose off. Great for fleet. Like this is, you know, pretty no frrills. So, just put it straight that way. And the unboxed uh manufacturing process is supposedly going to reduce the overall assembly line length by 50% and then make it faster. We don't know how much faster. We know installed capacity is about 125,000 per year to manufacture cyber cabs. That's the estimate Tesla's giving us, which is great and that'll be important in just a moment. So, we do expect that cyber cabs are much less expensive. So, I put $1 sign. So, it's kind of like, you know, cheap fast food versus, you know, a three dollar signed meal or maybe even a four dollar signed meal, right? Uh, obviously, Whimo uses a whole suite of sensors, LAR, vision, radar, and full mapping of the areas that they are operating in. Tesla on the other hand uh doesn't utilize that strategy. They utilize a vision only strategy, but it introduces the big concern for Tesla, which is uh expensive $3 sign expensive, not on the car, but expensive human edge mapping.
边缘映射基本上是你有一个监督驾驶员。他们认为这正是他们也更新了特斯拉车辆中 FSD 软件的原因。如果你不熟悉,现在每次你脱离 FSD,他们都会有一个持续的弹窗,这意味着它不会消失,直到你投票。
他们想要的是每次你脱离 FSD,你按,哦,我脱离 FSD 是因为我在停车。特斯拉对此不太在意。这对停车有一点帮助,但不太重要。呃,其他,他们也不太在意。安全、你的关键警报或导航警报,那是他们在意的。
所以你可以点击关键。他们想要修复所有这些边缘案例场景。导航也有用。所有这些都有各自的用处。公平地说,停车有用。导航有用。但仅靠特斯拉员工来消除所有那些需要关键干预的 FSD 边缘案例场景,真的非常昂贵。
所以他们基本上征用了每一个特斯拉驾驶员来处理那些边缘案例场景。
Edge mapping is basically where you have a supervising driver. And they think this is exactly why they've also updated the FSD software in Tesla vehicles. uh if you're not familiar with it, every time you disengage FSD now, they have a persistent popup, which means it doesn't go away until you vote. And what they want is every time you disengage FSD, you press, oh, I'm disengaging FSD because I'm parking. Tesla don't really care about that that much. It helps a little bit for parking, but less important. Uh other, they don't really care about that much either. Safety, your critical alerts or navigation alerts, that's what they care about. And so you could hit critical. They want to fix all of those edge case scenarios. And navigation useful as well. All of these are useful in their own right. In fairness, parking is useful. Navigation's useful. But killing all of those edge case scenarios with critical interventions of FSD is really, really expensive to do with only Tesla employees. So they've basically enlisted every single Tesla driver to deal with those edge case scenarios.
我在评论区看到很多人说:“嘿,我在休斯顿看到了赛博出租车。我在德克萨斯看到了。我在拉斯维加斯看到了。”很好。问题在于,在这些尚未完成边缘地图绘制的其他州,特斯拉实际上是在手动进行边缘地图绘制。
你可以在佛罗里达的这张照片中看到,车辆里有一个清晰的方向盘。所以我认为他们要做的是,部署大约20辆由特斯拉人类驾驶员驾驶的车辆,基本上利用赛博出租车自行对他们想要扩展的区域进行边缘地图绘制。
这是佛罗里达的一个例子。这是另一个南佛罗里达的例子。我想最后一个是奥兰多。在这个例子中,你也可以看到方向盘。所以我认为这并不意外。我认为他们没有隐瞒这一点,把音乐关掉。我不认为这一定是坏事,但问题是这很慢。
我真的认为雇佣20个人驾驶这些带有方向盘的车辆很贵吗?不。问题是时间。这可能是我们目前在边缘地图绘制中面临的最大问题。我认为制造方面我们没问题。我认为技术方面我们也没问题,但只有在耗时的边缘地图绘制完成后才行。
我认为特斯拉投资者现在最应该关注的是,奥斯汀花了12个月才基本上实现完全自动驾驶的机器人出租车,而且是去掉方向盘和踏板的车辆。那是奥斯汀。你现在真正需要看到的是,这些点被压缩到大约三个月的城市验证周期。
那将是理想的,因为我认为我们将以曲棍球棒式的增长超越Whimo的机器人出租车制造。
And so a lot of people I see in comments, they're saying, "Hey, I see cyber cabs in Houston. I see them in Texas. I see them in Vegas." Great. The problem with these vehicles in these other states where edge mapping has not been completed yet is Tesla is actually manually edge mapping. You could see in this Florida shot here, a clear steering wheel in the vehicle. And so I think what they're doing is they'll deploy, you know, maybe 20 of these with human Tesla drivers and they'll basically use the cybercap to go edge mapap themselves the areas they want to expand to. That's an example of a uh Florida one. There are here's another uh South Florida example. I think the last one was Orlando. And in this example as well, you could see a steering wheel here. So I don't think it's a surprise. I don't think they're hiding uh this and kill that music there. I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, but what it is is it's slow and that's the issue. Do I really think it's that expensive to hire 20 people to drive these vehicles with these, you know, steering wheels here? No. The problem is time. And that's probably the biggest issue that we face right now in edge mapping. I think manufacturing we're good. I think on the technology were good but only once the timeconsuming edge mapping has been completed. And the part that uh I really think a Tesla investor should pay most attention to right now is that it took Austin 12 months to get to basically full self-driving robo cabs right on a steering wheel and pedalless vehicle. That's Austin. What you really need to see now is you need to see those dots compressed to like three month validation cycles for cities. That would be ideal because I think we're going to hockey stick past Whimo's robo taxi manufacturing.
所以我们有一些估计,我们放在了电子表格上。据报道,Whimo在2024年7月有700辆机器人出租车上路。到2025年12月有2500辆上路,到2026年5月有3700辆上路。我只是插值并在这里加入1500,以便我能得到一个图表。
但这给了你Whimo的爬坡曲线图。特斯拉的赛博出租车大约从20上升到100。这些实际上是无人驾驶车辆。所以,这里的曲线有点曲棍球棒式的弯曲。这并不是特别有用,因为这些是
And so what we have is we have some estimates that we've put on a spreadsheet. So Whimo reportedly had 700 uh robo taxis on the road July 2024. 2500 on the road by December 25 and 3,700 on the road by May of 26. I'm just interpolating and throwing in a 1500 here so I can actually get a chart. But this gives you the the Whimo ramp graph, if you will. The Tesla Cyber Cab has, you know, really moved up like 20 to 100 roughly. Uh, and these are like actually driverless vehicles. So, you have a little bit more of a hockey stick bend here. Not that this is really particularly useful because these are
我相信特斯拉的情况是,我们现在正处于一个关键拐点,关乎我们边缘案例地图绘制的速度。特斯拉正处于边缘阶段。我们真正期待的是他们加速边缘处理的能力。所以,从边缘处理到完成。这对特斯拉来说至关重要。
I believe that the situation for Tesla is we are now at a critical inflection point on how fast we can edge case map. Tesla is in the edging phase. And what we're really looking forward to is their ability to accelerate edging. So, getting from edging to completion. That's what's critical here for Tesla.
在奥斯汀,花了12个月。也许在南佛罗里达,会缩短到八个月。这些爬坡越快越好。所以基本上从我们刚开始在拉斯维加斯测试,刚开始在休斯顿测试,到我们现在推出完全自动驾驶的机器人出租车或赛博出租车的时间。那是特斯拉的拐点。
In Austin, it took 12 months. Maybe in South Florida, it'll get down to eight months. the faster those ramps go. So basically time to you know time from we just started testing in Vegas and we just started testing in uh you know Houston or whatever to we are now launching fully selfdriving robo cababs or cyber cabs. That's your inflection point for Tesla.
那时事情会变得非常乐观。为什么?因为他们实际上可以比Whimo制造得快得多。
That's when things get really bullish. Why? Because they can actually manufacture a whole lot faster than Whimo.
特斯拉有可能达到10万辆。
You could potentially get to 100,000 at Tesla.
但这个拐点完全取决于他们能以多快的速度完成边缘阶段。一旦我们知道这一点,那时你才能真正更清晰地评估特斯拉的股票,在我看来。
But this inflection point is entirely dependent on how fast they could get through the edging phase. Once we know that, that's when you could really underwrite Tesla stock uh in my opinion more cleanly.
所以,如果我看我的特斯拉股票分析,我实际上认为,我之前已经将赛博出租车移除,仅仅作为安全网。在我看来,在昨天的事件之后,你可以把它加回来。
So, if I go to my Tesla stock analysis, I actually think, you know, I've I've previously removed Cyber Cab as as just a safety net. You can, in my opinion, add it back in after yesterday's event.
昨天的事件是一个短期的负面催化剂,因为人们会将其视为“买谣言,卖新闻”,因为老实说,他们搞砸了,比如埃隆本应该在那里。
Yesterday's event is a shortterm negative catalyst because people are going to see it as buy the rumor, sell the news because honestly, they dropped the ball on the like Elon should have been there.
如果埃隆只是做一个该死的演示,穿上裤子,走上舞台,说:“看,我们不绘制地图。我们只做纯视觉。我们在德克萨斯州奥斯汀花了12个月完成。我们认为在休斯顿可以在八个月内完成。我们认为在奥兰多可以在四个月内完成。”
你猜那意味着什么?那意味着我们进入的每一个后续城市,拉斯维加斯、丹佛、犹他州,等等等等,这里有一个地图在背景上,在图表上,我们现在可以这些从边缘到完成在三个月内。如果他上去说了那些,然后说:“这意味着到2027年底,我们可能有10万辆车上路,因为我们现在已经压缩了边缘处理的时间,我们准备好了。”这只股票今天会上涨20%。
If Elon just had a damn presentation, put his pants on, got up on stage, and said, "Look, we don't map. We do vision only. It took us 12 months to do it in Texas, in Austin. We think we could do it in eight months in Houston. We think we could do it in four months in Orlando." And guess what that means? That means every subsequent city we go into, Vegas, Denver, Utah, this that boom boom boom here's a map on on the background on the charter whatever we can now get these things from edging to done in three months. If he went up there and said that and then said, "This means by the end of 2027, we could have a 100,000 vehicles on the road because we have now compressed the time it takes to edge and we're good to go." This stock would be up 20% today.
现在,赛博出租车的收入实际上是什么样的?如果你将其视为从Uber那里夺取10%的市场份额,Uber显然拥有全球业务,利润率为20%。嘿,它可能增加约12亿美元的营业收入。这很好。
对于2030年的估值,它可能为股票增加约50美元。
Now what does uh you know cyber cab revenue actually look like? If you underwrite this as maybe taking 10% market share from Uber which has you know obviously a global operation at a 20% margin. Hey, it adds maybe $1.2 billion of operating income. It's that's good. It adds maybe $50 to the stock for a 2030 valuation.
这实际上不是我认为大部分钱来自的地方。拆箱过程。我实际上认为出售赛博出租车,然后让车队运营商来做,对特斯拉来说是最有利可图的。
It's not actually where most of the money I think comes from. uh the unboxing process. I actually think selling the cyber cabs and then letting fleet operators do it is the most profitable thing for Tesla.
我认为特斯拉应该验证技术并出售它。我不认为他们应该经营这些出租车。让别人承担折旧。卖掉这些。提前拿钱。卖给他们完全自动驾驶。让他们订阅完全自动驾驶,并真正制造高利润的赛博出租车。
出售高利润的FSD。不要经营载客的烂事。只需验证并卖掉那该死的车。我认为这就是未来。
I think Tesla should validate the technology and sell it. I don't think they should be in the business of operating these cabs. Let other people take the depreciation. Sell these. Take the money upfront. Sell them the full self-driving. Put them on a full self-driving subscription and literally manufacture high margin cyber caps. Sell high margin FSD. Don't operate the bull crap of driving people around. Just validate it and sell the damn car. I think that's the future.
现在,我已经在承销400万辆汽车销售。所以,我认为特斯拉2030年65美元的目标价已经包含了很多。它需要半挂卡车爬坡到35亿美元的营业收入。FSD订阅的营业收入大约翻倍。特斯拉机器人,我想看到20万台机器人的销售。
我认为到2030年这实际上是保守的。而且我想看到拆箱或赛博出租车机器人出租车的收入大约10亿美元。
Now, I'm already underwriting, you know, 4 million vehicle sales over here. So, I think there's a lot built into this $65 price target for Tesla for 2030. It requires uh the semi-truck to ramp to operating income of 3.5 billion. FSD subscriptions to roughly double on operating income. Tesla bot, I want to see 200,000 bot sales. I think I it's actually conservative by 2030. Uh and I want to see the unboxed uh or or cyber cap robo taxi revenues of about a billion bucks.
如果我们只是把这些卖给其他人,并且我们真的达到了那个拐点,那可能会更高。但我实际上认为,如果他们做了我刚刚说的,股票会表现得非常好。
That could end up being higher if we just sell these to others and we actually get that inflection point. But I actually think the stock would have done really well if they did what I just said.
比如,如果你在南佛罗里达,如果你在奥兰多,如果你在休斯顿,你看到完全自动驾驶的赛博出租车真的在那里部署,你应该跟踪他们何时开始,何时部署。一旦从一年压缩到三个月,那就是我们达到机器人出租车逃逸速度的时候。
Like if you're in South Florida, if you're in Orlando, if you're in Houston and you're like and you're seeing full self-driving cyber cabs actually get deployed there, you should be tracking when did they start, when did they deploy. As soon as that compresses from one year down to three months, that's when we get to escape velocity for robo taxis.
在那之前,要梳理出所有边缘场景是一个非常耗时的过程。我认为他们刚刚在奥斯汀经历的就是这个过程。而这是对特斯拉股票最大的考验。这是特斯拉股票未来最重要的事情。
Until then, it's a very time consuming process to map out all of the edge scenarios. And I think that's what they just went through with Austin. And that is the biggest test for Tesla stock. That's the most important thing for Tesla stock going forward.
特斯拉现在下跌了6%。所以基本上完全回吐了昨天的涨幅。看看那个。全部回吐了。
Tesla now down six. So really essentially unwinding all of yesterday's surge. Look at that. All of it.
我们提到了特斯拉的上涨。之前谈过这个。
We've got the edging on Tesla. Talked about that.
在得克萨斯州,那是一场为特斯拉影响者举办的活动,那些在社交媒体上同意签署保密协议的人,特斯拉没有直播该活动。基本上归结为这一点。他们提议,他们将开始提供Cybercab的商业载客服务,作为机器人出租车网络的一部分。
具体有多少辆,车费是多少等等,特斯拉目前尚未明确说明。车队数量也不清楚。会是几辆吗?会是十几辆吗?会是二十几辆吗?目前没人确定。而且,正如我提到的,联邦政府正在进行审计,以查明特斯拉为何认为它已经完成了确保这些车辆安全运行所需的流程。
In Texas, it was an event that was held for Tesla influencers, those on social media who agreed to sign non-disclosure agreements and Tesla did not stream the event. And it basically comes down to this. They offering they will start offering commercial rides in cyber cabs as part of the robo taxi network. Exactly how many, what the fairs will be, etc. That has not been clearly extated by Tesla at this point. And the fleet number is unclear. Is it going to be a couple? Is it going to be a dozen? Is it going to be two dozen? Nobody's sure right now. And as I mentioned, the federal government is doing an audit into exactly why Tesla believes it has gone through the processes necessary to ensure the safe operation of these vehicles.
华尔街对昨晚的Cybercab活动或非活动有何看法?巴克莱的Dan Levy表示,在没有关于增长和规模化目标的新增信息的情况下,我们认为该事件可能不会像一些投资者预期的那样成为重要的催化剂。
与此同时,Baird的Ben Callow表示,该事件对特斯拉来说是一个重要的里程碑。是的,如果他们被允许用Cybercab进行商业载客,那确实是一个里程碑。他们现在正在这样做。
一旦联邦政府进行调查,这种情况会继续吗?他们有可能回来说:“好吧,你们所说的将要发生的事情符合标准,但最终决定权在我们手中。”这就是Nitsa在这里所说的。
What does Wall Street think about the cyber cab event or non-event last night? Dan Levy at Barkley says without any new incrementals on growth scaling targets, we believe the event could prove to be less significant a catalyst than some investors had expected. Meanwhile, Ben Callow at Baird says the event is an important milestone for Tesla. And yes, it is a milestone if they are allowed to do commercial rides with the cyber cab. They're doing that right now. Will that continue once the federal government does its investigation here? It's possible they could come back and say, "Okay, what you said is going to be happening is meets up to it's up to par, but we have the final say is what Nitsa is saying here."
看看特斯拉的股价,今天的抛售并不令人意外,考虑到自7月28日以来的走势。它一直在稳步上涨。有三件事推动它:Cybercab、Optimus机器人的热情,以及显然人们谈论未来可能与SpaceX合并或SpaceX收购特斯拉的可能性。
As you take a look at shares of Tesla, bit of a sell-off today is not surprising, guys, given what we've seen since July 28th. It's just been on a a steady move higher. Three things driving it. Cybercab, Optimus robot enthusiasm and obviously people talking about the potential for a merger with SpaceX or SpaceX taking out Tesla at some point in the future.
我们的Philau今天在关注特斯拉。
our Philau watching Tesla today.
特斯拉下跌了6%。那也在今早的alpha报告中。
Tesla's down six. That was also in the alpha report this morning.
昨天我们提到特斯拉上涨,软件股像Palunteer一样上涨。
yesterday we called Tesla running up uh and software running like Palunteer.
我不能把Sprinter插到特斯拉充电器上。也许有一天。我仍然认为他们需要一辆特斯拉Sprinter货车,但这永远不会发生。真遗憾。这不会发生的。就是不会发生。真遗憾。
And I can't plug the Sprinter into the Tesla charger. Maybe one day. I I still think they need a Tesla Sprinter van, but it's just never going to happen. It's sad. It ain't going to happen. It just ain't going to happen. It's sad.
接下来,特斯拉股价下跌6%,有望创下自7月23日以来最糟糕的一天,此前备受期待的Cybercab在奥斯汀的首次亮相令人意外地平淡。
Coming up, Tesla shares are down 6% on pace for their worst day since July 23 after the surprisingly kind of lackluster Han debut of the long- aaited Cyber Cab in Austin.
所以,这是最后一件事。我想知道是否有人提到过这个。让我看看。让我们听一下,我要看看是否有人谈论过特朗普社交 >> 以及这个方程式中的人性方面。这是否解释了你引进的一些人?为什么你求助于像前奥巴马政府校友这样的政界人士?
>> 嗯,首先,当你能够拥有那些经历过非常困难情况、在最高权力层管理过的人时,这总是一个令人难以置信的情况。呃,不仅 >> 接下来 >> 我完全不知道。他们的工程师确实回答了一些问题,并与受邀参加这次活动的那些影响者交谈。
最终,这是一个温和的推动,说:“好吧,现在我们把它推出用于商业载客,至少在奥斯汀市场,我们可能也会在达拉斯和休斯顿看到。”嗯,再次,另一个问题变成了,联邦政府对此怎么说?因为Zuks,它也有一辆没有方向盘的车辆,它获得了联邦政府的豁免,可以开始商业载客。
特斯拉还没有发生这种情况。那么,这在未来几周和几个月会如何发展?观察起来会很有趣。
So, that's the last thing. I wonder if anybody's touched on that. Let me see here. Let's listen in here for a moment and I'm going to see if anybody's talked about the Trump social >> and the kind of uh human side of this equation, if you will. Does that explain some of the people you've brought on board here? Why is it that you turn to politicos like former Obama administration alumni for this effort? >> Well, first it's it's always an incredible situation when you can be able to have people who have been in really difficult situations that have managed, you know, at the highest levels of power. Uh not only >> next >> I I I have no idea. they did have their engineers uh addressing some questions and talking with those influencers who were invited to this event. Um and at the end of the day, it was it was a soft push in terms of saying, "Okay, now we're putting this out there for commercial rides, at least in the Austin market, and we might see it in Dallas and in Houston as well." Um and again, the the other question becomes here, what does the federal government say about this? Because Zuks, which also has a vehicle that does not have a steering wheel, it received a an exemption from the federal government to start commercial rides. That has not happened with Tesla. So, how does this play out over the weeks and months? It'll be interesting to watch.
是的,我们早些时候提到了特斯拉。我认为这不仅仅是观望。你必须关注从训练到真正实现自动驾驶所需时间的差距。这就是关键所在。
Yeah, we touched on Tesla early. I think it's more than just watch it play out. You got to you got to watch the spread between how long it takes for them to to get from training to um to actually self-driving. That's all it comes down to.
他说在等什么
这个频道对 $TSLA 的历次判断
Meet Kevin 在这只股票上共 8 条判断,这里只列相邻的几条。