$AAPL

AAPL

Apple Inc. · Apple Inc.
窗口 08-18 → 08-25 · 回看 7 天(美东)

AAPL 最近 7 天共 2 条观点条目。其中 0 条方向发生变化。数据截至 8 月 25 日。

本窗口内的全部观点与内容

名单内的来源在这个窗口里谈到这只股票的每一条视频,各一条。每一条转述都能回到英文原文与时间码。

排列
$AAPLMeet Kevin发布 2026-08-24
Nancy Pelosi Reveals MASSIVE 7-figure AI Stock Purchase
苹果公司被高估约40%,鉴于其稳定的9%增长和当前3.7的市盈率相对增长比率,市场已计入对AI和新产品的预期。
看跌

那么,为什么全年毛利率达到34%很重要呢?嗯,因为这与苹果非常相似,这有点令人兴奋,因为你知道,苹果是一家利润率相当高的企业。我们知道他们的东西并不便宜。但如果你查看苹果的任何财务报表,你会发现他们的产品毛利率也在37%左右。

现在,苹果与Bloom Energy不同的地方在于,苹果以约70%至75%的毛利率销售服务,而Bloom Energy没有。所以,苹果产品以约37%的毛利率销售,所以你知道,你卖出100美元的东西,37美元进入企业,他们可以用于研发、管理费用或广告等。

然后他们缴税,然后得到净利润,对吧?他们从100美元中剩下37美元。这很棒,因为它不仅给你37美元,还让更多人注册iCloud订阅,或者你知道,他们为音乐或其他产品提供的任何软件订阅,或者只是包含在内。

这对苹果来说是一个巨大的胜利,因为它的利润率非常高。

Now, why does 34% on gross margin matter for the full year? Well, because that's really similar to Apple, which is kind of exciting because, you know, Apple's a pretty high margin business. We know their stuff isn't exactly the cheap for a pretty penny. But if you go to any Apple financial statements, you'll see that their products also sell for about a 37% gross margin. Now, the thing that's different about Apple that gives Apple a big premium is they sell services at about a 70 to 75% gross margin that Bloom Energy doesn't. So, the Apple products that are selling for about 37% margin, so you know, you sell $100 worth of stuff, $37 goes into the business that they can then spend on research and G&A or advertising or whatever. Then they pay taxes on it, then they get their net, right? They got $37 $37 out of a hundred left. That is great because it doesn't just give you the $37. It leads more people to sign up for subscriptions to iCloud or, you know, whatever the the life software that they have for music or the subscriptions for any of their other products. Or just included. That's a big W for Apple because it's really high margin.

你看,苹果的增长并不高,但很稳定。苹果的增长大约是9%,很稳定。这意味着他们目前的市盈率约为3.7倍。在我看来,苹果目前实际上被高估了约40%,因为我喜欢将35倍的市盈率除以增长率,然后想,我不想为这种增长支付那么多。

现在,有希望CEO能帮助公司转型,带来更多产品和AI收入,但很多这种希望已经被定价了,对吧?

See, Apple's growth isn't that high, but it's stable. Apple's growth is like 9% stable. And that means they're trading for about a 3.7 PEG right now. In my opinion, Apple's actually about 40% overvalued right now because I like to combine, you know, a 35 PE ratio divided by the growth and go I don't want to pay that much for that growth. Now, there's hope that the CEO is going to help transition the company to more products and more AI revenues, but a lot of that hope is already priced in, all right?

所以,苹果非常有趣,因为在我查看股票AI标签之前,我计算了,嗯,我认为苹果值多少钱?我以我认为合理的市盈率来运行他们的PEG,比如2422左右。我认为苹果被高估了40%,这是我得出的估计。

我的股票AI工具和makeevin.com显示苹果有45%的下行空间。所以,这里并不太兴奋,只是因为太多的希望已经被定价了。也许增长率会飙升,如果苹果的增长率因新产品和折叠手机而飙升,那么你可以为这家公司证明更高的公允价值,更高的终值。

但是,我们真的依赖增长,而且我们并没有以折扣价买入苹果来证明,你知道,现在对冲这种增长是合理的。

So, Apple is very interesting because I calculated before I looked before I looked at the stock AI tab, I calculated um how much do I think Apple is worth? And I run their PEG at what I think a reasonable PEG is, like a 2422, somewhere in there. And I think Apple is overvalued to the tune of 40% was the estimate I came up with. My stock AI tool, and makeevin.com, shows me at a 45% downside for Apple. So, not really excited here just because so much hope is priced in. Maybe that growth rate will skyrocket, though. And if the growth rate for Apple skyrockets on new products and foldable phone, then you could justify a higher fair value, a higher terminal fair value for this company. But, we're really relying on growth and we're already we're not getting Apple for a discount to justify uh you know, hedging against that growth right now.

$AAPLMeet Kevin发布 2026-08-24
Memory Stock Crash, Bessent Bailout, Iran, Stocks & Real Estate
基于PEG分析,苹果估值约高估40%,但如果增长加速,则可能合理。
看跌

我的意思是,看,他们赚取很高的利润率。实际上,说实话,你几乎可以把苹果比作Bloom。但是苹果可能从记忆中降低到接近35%。所以,苹果比这些公司更有理由获得更高的市盈率。我稍后会验证这一点。

让我们看看。苹果。好的。我还在抓取一些截图。好的。我们开始。那是Oracle文档。我们看到了他们的Oracle说明。存款,预付款作为递延收入进来。人们总是在他们的现金流量表中看到这个,然后他们说,“看看所有这些现金流。”

但是,你知道,这比他们预先得到的要少,因为它们是存款。这就是重点。没关系。Bloom Energy。所以,大事是看涨的TAM。刚完成筛选这些看涨的TAM。让我们抓取这个。这是他们的指引。

这是他们的运营指引。所以,毛利率,净利率,利润率到处波动,还有关于积压订单的讨论。好的,完美。所以,让我们把所有这些放在一起,得出一些底线。苹果也越来越多地成为服务业务。而且那些利润率非常高。

I mean, see, they make great margins. Actually, honestly, you could kind of compare Apple to Bloom. Uh, but Apple probably brings down from memory closer to 35%. So, Apple justifies a higher peg than these guys do. Uh, I will verify that in just a moment. So, let's see here. Apple. Okay. Well, I'm still grabbing some of these screenies here. Okay. Let's go. That's the Oracle doc. We saw the Oracle note from them. Deposits, the upfront deposits, upfront deposits coming in as deferred revenues. People always end up seeing that in their cash flow statement and then they're like, "Look at all this cash flow." But, you know, that's less than they're going to get up front because they're deposits. That's the whole point. That's all right. Bloom Energy. So, the big thing was bullish TAM. Just finish screening these bullish TAM. Let's grab this. This was their guidance. This was their operating guidance. So, gross margin, net margin, margin swings all over the place, and the talk about backlogs. Okay, perfect. So, let's put all that together and come up with some bottom lines. And Apple's becoming more of a service business, too. And those margins are very high.

那让我们看看。让我快速拉出苹果。我认为这将是一个有用的时机。投资者关系。苹果。来吧。哦,它冻结了。来吧,苹果。加载你的SEC文件并不难。显然,它很难。愚蠢的东西冻结了。什么都做不了。

好的,没关系。重启谷歌浏览器。那真遗憾。但没关系。这就是技术。是时候买一台戴尔了。好的,让我们再试一次。苹果。我不敢相信加载苹果的投资者关系竟然导致谷歌浏览器崩溃。好的,这里。

所以,净销售额,我有毛利率。是的,看那个毛利率。54.7除以109.4,但那主要是因为软件。那是50%。所以他们的净收入是他们的净是27。所以实际上你更接近苹果了。他们的确实被服务支撑着,因为苹果的产品47.1除以78.6成本是60%。

所以我得到40%的毛利率。好的。所以,40%的毛利率对比大约35。你正在接近。你正在接近。好的。好吧。我认为这是一个公平的比较。所以,我几乎会称他为AI基础设施的苹果,除了软件部分。

所以我得重写这个。Bloom Energy BE产品的毛利率正在接近苹果。苹果上个季度的产品毛利率是40%。Bloom产品的毛利率是593除以935,63.4,36.5,产品上是36.5%。

所以实际上和苹果相似,对苹果有利,所以称之为PEG提升器是额外的服务收入。

What about let's see here. Let me pull Apple really quick. I think that'll this would be a useful time to do that. Investor relations. Apple. Come on. Uh oh, it's frozen. Come on, Apple. It's not that hard to load your SEC filings. Apparently, it is. Stupid thing's frozen. Can't do anything on it. Okay, fine. Restart the Google Chrome. That's a bummer. But it's okay. That's technology for you. Time to time to buy a Dell. All right, let's try again. Apple. I can't believe trying to load Apple's investor relations ended up crashing Google Chrome. Okay, here. So, net sales, I've got gross margin. Yeah, see, look at that gross margin. 54.7 divided by 109.4, but that's heavily because of software. That's 50%. So their net income is their net is 27. So actually you're getting closer to Apple. Theirs is really propped up though by services because Apple's products 47.1 divided by 78.6 cost them 60%. So I got a 40% gross margin. Okay. So, 40% gross margin versus like 35. You're getting there. You're getting there. Okay. All right. I think that's a fair comparison. So, I would almost call him like the Apple of AI infrastructure to some extent minus the the software part. So I got to rewrite this. Uh Bloom Energy BE uh gross margins on products are approaching Apple. Apple last Q gross margins are uh 40%. on products. Bloom uh gross margins are on products 593 divided by 935 63.4 36.5 36.5% on a product. So it's actually similar to Apple uh benefit for Apple uh so call it a PEG booster is the extra services revenue

而且苹果也越来越多地成为服务业务。而且那些利润率非常高。

And Apple's becoming more of a service business, too. And those margins are very high.

因此,这证明了比苹果更低的市盈率是合理的。

Therefore, uh justifies a lower peg than say an apple.

所以,净销售额,我有毛利率。是的,看那个毛利率。54.7除以109.4,但那主要是因为软件。那是50%。所以他们的净收入是他们的净是27。所以实际上你更接近苹果了。他们的确实被服务支撑着,因为苹果的产品47.1除以78.6成本是60%。所以我得到40%的毛利率。

So, net sales, I've got gross margin. Yeah, see, look at that gross margin. 54.7 divided by 109.4, but that's heavily because of software. That's 50%. So their net income is their net is 27. So actually you're getting closer to Apple. Theirs is really propped up though by services because Apple's products 47.1 divided by 78.6 cost them 60%. So I got a 40% gross margin.

嗯。好的。我们可能会对此做个小总结。但我想看看苹果。看看苹果。想想苹果。我的意思是Bloom的增长是疯狂的。苹果的增长明显更慢,但这已经反映在每股收益增长水平上了,因为只是为了比较,让我们把苹果作为比较。

呃,APL,苹果估值,你知道,只是为了比较。所以,苹果的交易价格大约310,就叫它310股票。呃,远期每股收益。我切掉这个。苹果的远期每股收益是让我们找出来。看看他们的预测是什么。

让我们改成APL。好的。8美元。8.80美元。好的,所以苹果的每股收益是8.80美元。8.80美元远期增长。是的,只有大约10%。8.61 1121 8.55 9.62除以4 9.5%。

预测每股收益增长。所以那使苹果成为310美元的股票。这些是增长曲线的完全不同部分。35倍市盈率。如果我除以9.5%的增长,老兄,这是以3.7的PEG交易的,苹果在这个水平上基本上被高估了。

我的意思是,我不想这么说,但你知道,苹果可能交易得更接近。我的意思是,有了服务业务,他们的净利率基本上是多少?29 30。是的,他们带来的净收入多得多。29因为Bloom不会达到这些水平,除以109.4,服务带来27%的净利率,基本上会比Bloom带来更多的净收入。

也许那证明了你知道两个PEG之类的,对吧?那真的表明苹果被高估了。所以如果我22除以3.7,那是40%,苹果比公允价值高40%。而BE更接近公允价值,我认为其中很多可能只是CEO过渡的炒作。

所以CEO过渡的炒作也许,但你知道,你必须执行。所以,这里有点工作要做。

Huh. Okay. We might do like a little summary on that. But I want to look at Apple for a moment. How is See in Apple. Think about Apple. I mean Bloom's growth is insane. Apple's growth is significantly slower, but that's already factored into the EPS growth level because just for comparison, let's put Apple in as a comparison. Uh, APL, Apple valuation, you know, just to compare. So, Apple's trading for like 310, call it 310 stock. Uh, a Ford EPS. I'm cutting this off. Ford EPS for Apple is Let's find out. See what their forecast is. Let's change that to APL. Okay. Uh, $8. $8.80. Okay, so $8.80 for Apple's EPS. $8.80 forward growth. Yeah, it's only like 10%. 8.61 1121 8.55 9.62 / 4 9.5%. Uh projected EPS growth. So that puts Apple at a $310 stock. These are a totally different parts of the growth cur growth curve. 35x PE. And if I divide that by 9.5% growth, dude, this is trading for a 3.7 peg, Apple uh is, you know, fundamentally overvalued at this level. I mean, I hate to say it, but you know, Apple could probably be trading for closer. I mean, with the services biz, what are their net margins fundamentally? Uh 29 30. Yeah, they're bringing down a lot more to the net. 29 because Bloom's not going to get to these levels divided by 109.4 with the ser 27% net fundamentally uh going to drive more net income than Bloom uh due to services. Maybe maybe that justifies a you know two two peg something like that right that really suggests Apple is over. So if I go 22 divided by 3.7, that's 40% 40% uh over fair value at Apple. Uh where be is closer to fair and and a lot of that I think is probably just hype on the CEO transition. Uh so CEO transition hype maybe, but you know, you got to execute. So, this is a little bit of work to do there.

好的。所以,毛利率,让我们看看。是的,看苹果我知道是好的。那大约是服务75%的毛利率。那是Bloom没有的,因为苹果卖的产品越多,那就越成为服务的销售宣传。所以,你确实更集中在制造方面,这带来一些风险,这可能就是为什么苹果的定价如此强劲。

呃,对。所以苹果的定价反映了产品带来的ARR,在我看来。

Okay. So, gross margin, let's see. Yeah, se Apple I know is okay. That's about a 75% gross margin on the services. And that's the thing that Bloom doesn't have because the more products Apple sells, the more that becomes a sales pitch for the services. So, you're really much more concentrated on the manufacturing side that creates some risk and that's probably why Apple is pricing so much stronger. Uh, right. So Apple's pricing uh reflects that ARR the products enable you know in my opinion.

现在为什么全年34%的毛利率很重要?嗯,因为那真的和苹果相似,这有点令人兴奋,因为你知道苹果是一个利润率很高的业务。我们知道他们的东西不便宜,但如果你去看苹果的财务报表,你会看到他们的产品也以大约37%的毛利率销售。现在,事情

Now why does 34% on gross margin matter for the full year? Well, because that's really similar to Apple, which is kind of exciting because you know Apple's a pretty high margin business. We know their stuff isn't exactly the cheap for a pretty penny, but if you go to the Apple financial statements, you'll see that their products also sell for about a 37% gross margin. Now, the thing

看,苹果的增长不是很高,但很稳定。苹果的增长大约是9%,稳定。那意味着他们现在以大约3.7的PEG交易。在我看来,苹果现在实际上被高估了大约40%,因为我喜欢把35倍市盈率除以增长,然后想,我不想为那个增长付那么多钱。

现在,有希望CEO能帮助公司转型到更多产品和更多AI收入,但很多希望现在已经计入价格了,对吧?

See, Apple's growth isn't that high, but it's stable. Apple's growth is like 9% stable. And that means they're trading for about a 3.7 peg right now. In my opinion, Apple's actually about 40% overvalued right now because I like to combine, you know, 35 PE ratio divided by the growth and go, I don't want to pay that much for that growth. Now, there's hope that the CEO is going to help transition the company to more products and more AI revenues, but a lot of that hope is already priced in now, right?

所以,苹果非常有趣,因为在我查看股票AI标签之前,我计算了一下我认为苹果值多少钱,我以我认为合理的市盈率(比如2、4、22左右)来运行它的PEG,我认为苹果被高估了约40%,这是我得出的估计。

我在mekevin.com的股票AI工具显示苹果有45%的下行空间。所以,这里并不令人兴奋,只是因为定价中包含了太多希望。不过,也许增长率会飙升。如果苹果的增长率因新产品和折叠手机而飙升,那么你可以为这家公司证明更高的公允价值,更高的最终公允价值。

但我们确实依赖增长,而且我们并没有以折扣价买入苹果来证明对冲这种增长是合理的。

So, Apple is very interesting because I calculated before I looked before I looked at the stock AI tab, I calculated um how much do I think Apple is worth and I run their peg at what I think a reasonable peg is like a 2 4 22 somewhere in there and I think Apple is overvalued to the tune of 40% was the estimate I came up with. My stock AI tool at mekevin.com shows me at a 45% downside for Apple. So, not really excited here just because so much hope is priced in. Maybe that growth rate will skyrocket though. And if the growth rate for Apple skyrockets on new products and foldable phone, then you could justify a higher fair value, a higher terminal fair value for this company. But we're really relying on growth and we're already we're not getting Apple for a discount to justify uh you know hedging against that growth right now.

KOL的观察点

名单内的来源在这个窗口里没有说他们在等什么。
研究辅助,非投资建议