那么,为什么全年毛利率达到34%很重要呢?嗯,因为这与苹果非常相似,这有点令人兴奋,因为你知道,苹果是一家利润率相当高的企业。我们知道他们的东西并不便宜。但如果你查看苹果的任何财务报表,你会发现他们的产品毛利率也在37%左右。
现在,苹果与Bloom Energy不同的地方在于,苹果以约70%至75%的毛利率销售服务,而Bloom Energy没有。所以,苹果产品以约37%的毛利率销售,所以你知道,你卖出100美元的东西,37美元进入企业,他们可以用于研发、管理费用或广告等。
然后他们缴税,然后得到净利润,对吧?他们从100美元中剩下37美元。这很棒,因为它不仅给你37美元,还让更多人注册iCloud订阅,或者你知道,他们为音乐或其他产品提供的任何软件订阅,或者只是包含在内。
这对苹果来说是一个巨大的胜利,因为它的利润率非常高。
Now, why does 34% on gross margin matter for the full year? Well, because that's really similar to Apple, which is kind of exciting because, you know, Apple's a pretty high margin business. We know their stuff isn't exactly the cheap for a pretty penny. But if you go to any Apple financial statements, you'll see that their products also sell for about a 37% gross margin. Now, the thing that's different about Apple that gives Apple a big premium is they sell services at about a 70 to 75% gross margin that Bloom Energy doesn't. So, the Apple products that are selling for about 37% margin, so you know, you sell $100 worth of stuff, $37 goes into the business that they can then spend on research and G&A or advertising or whatever. Then they pay taxes on it, then they get their net, right? They got $37 $37 out of a hundred left. That is great because it doesn't just give you the $37. It leads more people to sign up for subscriptions to iCloud or, you know, whatever the the life software that they have for music or the subscriptions for any of their other products. Or just included. That's a big W for Apple because it's really high margin.
你看,苹果的增长并不高,但很稳定。苹果的增长大约是9%,很稳定。这意味着他们目前的市盈率约为3.7倍。在我看来,苹果目前实际上被高估了约40%,因为我喜欢将35倍的市盈率除以增长率,然后想,我不想为这种增长支付那么多。
现在,有希望CEO能帮助公司转型,带来更多产品和AI收入,但很多这种希望已经被定价了,对吧?
See, Apple's growth isn't that high, but it's stable. Apple's growth is like 9% stable. And that means they're trading for about a 3.7 PEG right now. In my opinion, Apple's actually about 40% overvalued right now because I like to combine, you know, a 35 PE ratio divided by the growth and go I don't want to pay that much for that growth. Now, there's hope that the CEO is going to help transition the company to more products and more AI revenues, but a lot of that hope is already priced in, all right?
所以,苹果非常有趣,因为在我查看股票AI标签之前,我计算了,嗯,我认为苹果值多少钱?我以我认为合理的市盈率来运行他们的PEG,比如2422左右。我认为苹果被高估了40%,这是我得出的估计。
我的股票AI工具和makeevin.com显示苹果有45%的下行空间。所以,这里并不太兴奋,只是因为太多的希望已经被定价了。也许增长率会飙升,如果苹果的增长率因新产品和折叠手机而飙升,那么你可以为这家公司证明更高的公允价值,更高的终值。
但是,我们真的依赖增长,而且我们并没有以折扣价买入苹果来证明,你知道,现在对冲这种增长是合理的。
So, Apple is very interesting because I calculated before I looked before I looked at the stock AI tab, I calculated um how much do I think Apple is worth? And I run their PEG at what I think a reasonable PEG is, like a 2422, somewhere in there. And I think Apple is overvalued to the tune of 40% was the estimate I came up with. My stock AI tool, and makeevin.com, shows me at a 45% downside for Apple. So, not really excited here just because so much hope is priced in. Maybe that growth rate will skyrocket, though. And if the growth rate for Apple skyrockets on new products and foldable phone, then you could justify a higher fair value, a higher terminal fair value for this company. But, we're really relying on growth and we're already we're not getting Apple for a discount to justify uh you know, hedging against that growth right now.