在公司债券资产类别中，我们看到的几乎是相同的情况。中期和短期债券在之前的版本中已经处于绿色跑赢前景，而长期债券是中性但前景负面，现在这已经改变了。这现在绝对是跑输者，你可以看到，如果我们往回看1 2 3 4周，你可以看到这是一个奇怪的情况。
我们讨论过这三只ETF都在右侧，而理论上它们应该包含LQD中的所有内容。嗯，显然情况并非如此，因为在这些部分中仍然有不同的债券。这是一个相当技术性的故事，但我不知道确切百分比，但可能这三只ETF组成的债券中有90%也在LQD中。
所以，这就是为什么我们让这三只ETF都处于领先象限有点奇怪，而现在这已经自行解决了，你可以看到中期和短期债券继续其相对上升趋势，进一步进入领先象限，而长期债券，长期公司债券现在已经向下解决，它们现在明显处于滞后象限，并进一步深入其中。
Pretty much the same situation we see in the corporate bond asset class. The intermediate and short-term bonds were already on a green on an outperformance outlook in the previous version, and long-term bonds were neutral with a negative outlook, and that has now changed. This is now definitely an underperformer, and you can see how that So, if we go 1 2 3 4 weeks back, you can see how this was a strange situation. We talked about it that all three of these ETFs were on the right-hand side, while theoretically they should encompass everything that's in LQD. Uh clearly, that's not the case because there is still different bonds in all these sections. It's pretty technical story, but I don't know the exact percentage, but maybe 90% of all the bonds that make up these three ETFs are also in LQD. So, that's why it was a little strange that we had all three of these ETFs inside the leading quadrant, and that has now resolved itself, and you can see that intermediate and short-term bonds continued their relative uptrend further into the leading quadrant, and you see that long-term bonds long-term corporate bonds have now resolved to the downside, and they are now clearly inside the lagging quadrant and moving further into it.