NVDA 因具备持久的竞争优势,且合理价值 338 美元较当前 224 美元有显著上行空间,是比 MU 更受青睐的买入标的。
逐段跳播
Nvidia 和 Micron 是从数据中心建设支出大幅增长中受益最多的两家公司。Micron 在最近一个已结束季度的营收较去年同期增长超过 4 倍,而 Nvidia 的营收已飙升至接近 3030 亿美元。
Nvidia and Micron are two of the companies benefiting most from the huge increase in spending on creating data centers. Micron's revenue increased by more than 4 x in its most recently completed quarter from the same time last year, while Nvidia's revenues have soared to approach $303 billion.
但在当前市场价格下,这两家中哪一家是更值得买入的股票?这正是我想在本视频中通过将两者正面对比来回答的问题。自 2023 年以来,Nvidia 的业务蒸蒸日上,而 Micron 则是更近期才开始业务繁荣。
你可以看到 Nvidia 的销售在 2023 年爆发式增长,营收超过了 Micron。2022 年两家公司的营收相近,事实上在 2022 年之前的十年中大部分时间里,Micron 的营收都高于 Nvidia。
But which one of these two is the better stock to buy at current market prices? That's the question I want to answer in this video by comparing the two head to head. Since 2023 business is booming for Nvidia and for more recently business is booming for Micron.
You can see Nvidia's sales boom in 2023, soaring, surpassing Micron in revenues. Their revenues were close in 2022 and in fact for the better part of the previous decade before 2022, Micron generated more revenue than Nvidia.
但近年来你可以看到,自 2023 年以来,Nvidia 的营收大幅飙升,如今已是 Micron 的三倍以上。
But in recent years you can see since 2023, Nvidia's revenues have soared and it's now more than triple that of Micron.
Micron 的营收在更近期实现增长,受益于内存价格飙升,因为智能体 AI 的普及使内存和存储变得重要得多。Micron 在最近一个滚动 12 个月期间的营收增至超过 900 亿美元,而 Nvidia 的营收正接近 3030 亿美元。
Micron's revenue has increased more recently benefiting from soaring prices for memory as the proliferation of agentic AI has made memory and storage that much more important. Micron's revenues increased to over $90 billion in the most recent trailing 12-month period, while Nvidia's are approaching $303 billion.
展望未来,预计 Micron 和 Nvidia 至少在未来几年、很可能至少未来三年都将实现显著的营收增长。这些公司签署的合同已延伸至未来几年之后,因为对这些技术的采购使得提前锁定供应以满足自身需求变得更加紧迫。
因此,Nvidia 和 Micron 对其销售前景有了更高的可见度,不仅是 2026 年,还包括 2027 年和 2028 年,Micron 还告知投资者,其签署的战略客户协议一直延伸至 2030 年。这是一个新的进展。
Looking forward, Micron and Nvidia are expected to generate significant revenue growth for at least a couple of more years, probably three more years at the least. The contracts that these companies have signed have extended beyond these next couple of years as the purchases of these technologies have made it more urgent to secure supply ahead of their needs.
And so, Nvidia and Micron have more visibility into what their sales look like, not just for 2026, but also for 2027 and 2028, with Micron informing investors that it signed strategic customer agreements that are spanning all the way out until 2030. This is a new development.
通常情况下,Nvidia 和 Micron 在产品推出的当年就将其售出,相关协议与技术的买方联系较为松散。但由于出现了严重的短缺,且 Nvidia 和 Micron 的产品已经售罄数年,技术的买方正在提前规划,为 Micron 和 Nvidia 锁定未来许多年的协议。
这对 Nvidia 和 Micron 来说是好消息。这让它们的业务更易于管理。如果它们知道客户明年和后年想要什么,就能相应地做规划。它们可以与供应商合作,与供应链合作,确保有足够的产品来满足需求。
这降低了研发的风险。它们知道该研发什么样的产品,因为它们与最大的客户有沟通,客户会告诉它们未来会寻找什么。这一切对 Nvidia 和 Micron 都非常有利。
Typically, Nvidia and Micron sell their products in the year they're launched with agreements loosely connected to the buyers of the technology. But, since there's been significant shortages, and Nvidia's and Micron's products have been sold out for a couple of years now, buyers of the technology are planning ahead, securing agreements for Micron and Nvidia for many years into the future.
That's good news for Nvidia and Micron. It makes their business more manageable. If they know what their customers want next year and the year after that, they can plan accordingly.
They can work with their suppliers. They can work with their supply chain and make sure that they have enough product to meet that demand. It lowers the risk for research and development.
They know what kind of products to research and development because they have conversations with their biggest customers, and their customers inform them what they'll be looking for. That's all been great for Nvidia and Micron.
现在,更令人印象深刻的是,这些公司在销售火爆的同时利润率也火爆。事实上,Micron 在最近一个已结束季度的营业利润率超过了 80%。这是我在过去十年跟踪过的任何其他公司身上都未曾见过的。这是我第一次见到营业利润率超过 80%。
Now, to make matters more impressive, these companies have been generating booming sales with booming profit margins. In fact, Micron's operating profit margin in the most recently completed quarter exceeded 80%.
It's something I haven't seen with any other company that I've been following in the previous decade. It's the first time I've ever seen an operating profit margin above 80%.
从滚动 12 个月来看,Micron 的营业利润率以 65.75% 略高于 Nvidia。
Looking at it on a trailing 12-month basis, Micron's operating profit margin ticked above Nvidia at 65.75%
Nvidia 为 65.2%。这些都是极佳的营业利润率,直到最近,Visa 一直是营业利润率最高的公司,处于 60% 多的区间,而 Nvidia、Micron 以及其他几家公司如今在半导体需求旺盛的推动下正接近这样的盈利水平。
Nvidia at 65.2%. These are excellent operating profit margins and until recently Visa had been the company with the highest operating profit margin in the 60% range and Nvidia, Micron, and a few other companies are now approaching these levels of profitability given booming demand for semiconductors.
现在,就 Nvidia 而言,我认为其处于 60% 多区间的营业利润率比 Micron 更具可持续性。不过,短期内,我认为 Micron 的营业利润率很可能会超过 Nvidia,大概是在未来 12 个月。
Now, for Nvidia I think it's operating profit margin in the 60% range is more sustainable than Micron. However, in the short run, I believe Micron's operating profit margin will likely exceed Nvidia's probably for the next 12 months.
然而,从更长期来看,与 Nvidia 相比,Micron 在实现更高平均售价方面的灵活性较低,而 Nvidia 拥有更强的竞争优势和更强的议价能力,相对而言能将其价格维持在当前水平。
因此,对 Micron 来说,存在一种风险:也许在 2 年后或 3 年后,当存储和内存市场的供需格局改善时,Micron 的单位价格将会下跌。
However, looking longer term, Micron has less flexibility to generate those higher average selling prices compared to Nvidia, which has more competitive advantage, more negotiating power to sustain its prices at where they're at, relatively speaking.
So, with Micron, there's a risk that maybe 2 years from now or 3 years from now when the supply demand dynamics improve in the storage and memory markets, that Micron's price per unit will drop.
因此,这两家公司的利润率很可能至少在接下来 12 个月保持高位,很可能是接下来 24 个月,之后我们就会开始听到关于未来 36 个月和 48 个月前景如何的消息。
So, profit margins are likely to stay elevated for at least the next 12 months for these two, probably the next 24 months, and then we'll start to hear about what the prospects look like 36 and 48 months into the future.
正如我之前提到的,这就是这些公司的下一个大事件。我们对这些公司的需求和供应有了越来越多的可见度。我们现在展望未来两三年,因为我们知道它们未来 12 个月已经售罄。我们知道它们很可能未来 24 个月也已售罄。
所以现在我们考虑的是未来三年、未来四年、未来五年。
And that's been the next big thing with these companies as I mentioned earlier. We're getting more and more visibility into demand and supply for these companies. We're now looking two or three years into the future because we know that they're sold out for the next 12 months.
We know that they're probably sold out for the next 24 months. So now we're thinking about three years into the future, four years into the future, five years into the future.
这两家公司的情况将会怎样?对许多投资者来说,这方面有很多担忧,因为眼下正在建设的所有这些数据中心,人们担心存在过度建设。而在某个时点,这些数据中心产能的使用者将不再需要所有这些过剩的需求。
What's the situation going to look like for these two? And for many investors, there's a lot of concern about that because all of these data centers that are being built right now, there's concern that there's overbuilding.
And at a certain point, those consumers of the capacity in these data centers will no longer need all of that excess demand.
因此,投资者会担心需求将出现大幅下滑。不是今年,也不是明年,因为那些协议大体上已经落实,但也许在三年后,也许在四年后,Nvidia 和 Micron 会经历销售的大幅下滑吗?这确实是一种风险。
And so there will be investors are concerned that there will be a big drop-off in demand. Not this year, not next year, because those agreements are largely in place, but maybe three years from now, maybe four years from now, will Nvidia and Micron experience a big drop-off in sales? And that's a risk, to be sure.
但投资者可以感到宽慰的一点是,这些从 2023 年开始建设的数据中心,其组件将需要更换和升级,对吧?当我们展望未来两年时,我们看的是 2028 年、2029 年。所以那些 2022 年和 2023 年就在数据中心里的组件,将会变得过时,需要更换。
这样 Nvidia 和 Micron 就能从更换周期中获得营收。因此,每一年都会有对需要更换的过时产品的需求。
But one thing investors can take comfort in is these data centers that were built starting in 2023, those components will need to be replaced and upgraded, right? When we look two years into the future, we're going to be looking into 2028, 2029.
So those components that are in data centers from 2022 and 2023, those will be getting outdated and they'll need to be replaced. So then Nvidia and Micron can generate revenue from the replacement cycle.
So each and every year there's going to be demand from those outdated products that need to be replaced.
但这足以将营收维持在这些水平吗?这是个大问号,还有利润率能否维持在这些水平。
But will that be enough to sustain revenues at these levels? That's the big question mark and profit margins at these levels.
所以,正如它们的营业利润率一样,它们的投入资本回报率正在大幅提升,而且我会说这种提升是不可持续的。Nvidia 的投入资本回报率已经连续一年半以上高于 100%。事实上,目前达到 109%。
在我跟踪的所有公司中,这是最顶尖之列中极为出色的投入资本回报率。一个通用的经验法则是,如果一家公司的投入资本回报率高于其加权平均资本成本,那么它就在为股东创造价值。因此,高于 1:1 的比率,我认为是稳健的比率,而高于这一水平就开始变得更好。
Nvidia 的 109% 相对于其加权平均资本成本大约是 7 或 8:1。非常出色,不可持续,但非常出色。不过,未来 12 到 24 个月,它很可能会维持在这些水平。尤其是因为 Nvidia 是相对轻资产的商业模式。
它主要做技术的研发,并把制造外包给 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company。因此,这减轻了公司投入资本回报率上的压力,因为它不需要投入那么多资本。
So, just like their operating profit margins, their returns on invested capital are improving dramatically and I would say unsustainably. Nvidia's return on invested capital has been above 100% for over a year and a half now.
In fact, it's at 109%. This is a remarkable return on invested capital among the best of the best of any company I'm following. A general rule of thumb is if a company's return on invested capital is above its weighted average cost of capital, then it's adding shareholder value.
So, a ratio above 1:1, I view as a solid ratio and anything above that starts to become even better. Nvidia at 109% is about 7 or 8:1 comparing to its weighted average cost of capital.
Remarkable, unsustainable, but remarkable. However, the next 12 to 24 months, it'll probably remain at these levels. Especially because Nvidia is a relatively asset-light business model.
It does mostly researching and developing the technology and outsourcing the manufacturing to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. So, that relieves the pressure on the company's return on invested capital because it doesn't need to invest as much capital.
好,我们看了业绩表现、营收、盈利能力、投入资本回报率。对 Micron 和 Nvidia 来说,都是优秀、优秀、优秀。正如我提到的,它们正从数据中心以及进入这些数据中心的组件需求的蓬勃增长中显著受益。
All right, so we looked at performance, revenue, profitability, returns on invested capital. Excellent, excellent, and excellent for Micron and Nvidia. As I mentioned, they're benefiting significantly from the booming demand for data centers and the components that are going into those data centers.
Nvidia 目前的远期市盈率为 14.5。这是一个相对便宜的估值。正如我早些时候提到的,投资者担心 Nvidia 和 Micron 的营收和利润会断崖式下跌。不是今年,不是明年,而是从 2028 年开始,也许是 2029 年。
投资者群体中存在一种明显的担忧,即营收和利润会断崖式下跌。因此,Nvidia 和 Micron 的估值已经反映了这一风险。Nvidia 目前的远期市盈率仅为 14.5。
Nvidia is trading at a forward price to earnings of 14.5. This is a relatively cheap valuation. As I mentioned earlier, investors are concerned that revenue and profits are going to fall off a cliff for Nvidia and Micron.
Not this year, not next year, but starting 2028, maybe 2029. There is a palatable concern from the investor community that revenue and profits are going to fall off a cliff. And so, valuations for Nvidia and Micron are accounting for that risk.
Nvidia is selling at a forward price to earnings of just 14.5.
这相对于标普 500 中普通股票的估值是折价,后者市盈率更接近 25、26。Walmart 的远期市盈率约为 30。所以,Walmart 的远期市盈率是 Nvidia 的两倍多。
This is at a discount to the average stock in the S&P 500, which is selling at closer to 25, 26. Walmart is selling at a forward price to earnings of around 30. So, Walmart is selling at a forward PE that's more than double Nvidia.
Costco 的远期市盈率几乎是 Nvidia 的三倍,也许是 Micron 的六到七倍,对吧?而这些公司的增长速度远不及 Nvidia 和 Micron 的增长速度,或者利润率也远达不到这些水平。
Costco is selling at a forward PE that's almost triple Nvidia, and maybe six or seven times Micron, right? And these These companies that are not growing anywhere near the rates that Nvidia and Micron are growing or generating profit margins anywhere near these levels.
所以,这正好说明了 Nvidia 和 Micron 身上的恐惧因素,以及这种恐惧已经在多大程度上反映在估值中。这不是投资者对此掉以轻心的事情,对吧?
So, that just puts into context the fear factor with Nvidia and Micron and how much it's baked into the valuation already. It's not something that investors are complacent about, right?
在 Nvidia 和 Micron 身上,我看不到太多这种情况。相对于市场中的普通股票,相对于这些公司正在创造的利润、盈利和利润率,它们的估值相对便宜。
I don't see very much of that with Nvidia and Micron. The valuations are relatively cheap compared to the average stock in the market, compared to the profits and earnings and profit margins that these companies are generating.
相比之下,Micron 的售价不到 Nvidia 的一半。我认为这是合理的。正如我早些时候提到的,我认为 Nvidia 的竞争优势比 Micron 更持久。Micron 的存储和内存产品与 SK Hynix 和 Samsung 等竞争对手并没有太大差异化。
事实上,Micron 在 HBM 上落后于 SK Hynix。
Comparatively, Micron is selling at less than half the price of Nvidia. And I think that's justified. I as I mentioned earlier, I think Nvidia's competitive advantages are more durable than Micron.
Micron's memory and storage products are not all that differentiated from competitors like SK Hynix and Samsung. In fact, Micron in HBM is trailing SK Hynix.
而 Nvidia 在加速计算领域是绝对的领导者,它向客户交付的 AI 工厂包含软件以及硬件。所以,我觉得 Nvidia 的竞争优势更持久,其售价更可持续,而 Micron 则是在短期内受益于供需状况。
一旦这一状况得到修正,估计显示 2028 年将是我们开始看到内存和存储市场更加平衡的一年。2026 年、2027 年可能仍有利于 Micron,但 2028 年或许会达到更好的均衡。
Whereas Nvidia is the absolute leader in accelerated computing, in the AI factory that it delivers to its customers with the software along with the hardware. So, I feel Nvidia's competitive advantages are more durable, its selling price more sustainable, whereas Micron is benefiting in the short term from the supply demand situation.
Which as soon as that corrects, estimates suggest that 2028 will be the year where we'll start to see a more balanced memory and storage market. 2026, 2027 likely still benefiting Micron, but 2028 perhaps a better equilibrium.
但对 Nvidia 来说,它并非仅仅受益于供需动态。它受益是因为其产品,其整体产品组合,至少领先竞争对手一步。有些人会认为至少领先竞争对手两步。所以我觉得它更持久,因此在按远期市盈率衡量时,它相对于 Micron 理应获得更高的估值溢价。
But for Nvidia, it's not benefiting from only the supply-demand dynamics. It's benefiting because its product its holistic product offering is at least one step ahead of the competition.
And some would argue at least two steps ahead of the competition. And so I feel it's more durable and so it deserves a more premium valuation compared to Micron when measuring on a forward PE basis.
对于 Nvidia,我计算出的公允价值为 338 美元。当前市场价格为 224 美元,这意味着 Nvidia 有超过 50% 的上涨空间。所以,按 DCF 衡量,Nvidia 股票看起来比 Micron 股票更被低估。
此外,按远期市盈率衡量,我觉得 Nvidia 的估值溢价因其更持久的竞争优势而是合理的。
For Nvidia, I calculated a fair value of $338. A current market price at $224 leaves over 50% upside for Nvidia. So when measuring on a DCF basis, Nvidia stock looks more undervalued than Micron stock.
Additionally, on a forward PE basis, I feel Nvidia's premium valuation is justified by the more durable competitive advantage.
所以,如果我必须在这两者之间,Micron 或 Nvidia,选择在当前市场价格下更值得买入的股票,我会选择 Nvidia。在当前这些市场价格下,对我来说这会是一个相对容易的决定。
事实上,我的投资组合中持有 Nvidia 股票。根据当天的价格走势,它会在 Nvidia 和 Netflix 之间波动,成为我投资组合中的头号持仓。所以,我可能有点偏见,但我有偏见是因为我的研究把我引向了这个方向,让我选择了 Nvidia 而非 Micron。
它们两者都很优秀。我把它们都列为买入机会,但如果我必须只选一个,我会选择 Nvidia。
So, if I had to pick between these two, Micron or Nvidia as the better stock to buy at current market prices, I would pick Nvidia. And it would be a relatively easy decision for me compared at these market prices.
In fact, I own Nvidia stock in my portfolio. It fluctuates between Nvidia and Netflix as my top position in my portfolio depending on the price action in the day. So, I might be a little biased, but I'm biased because my research has pointed me in that direction where I've chosen Nvidia over Micron.
They're both excellent. I have them both ranked as buying opportunities, but if I had to pick only one, I would pick Nvidia.
这个频道对 $NVDA 的历次判断
Parkev Tatevosian, CFA 在这只股票上共 11 条判断,这里只列相邻的几条。